{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]],"date-time":"2026-02-26T03:39:28Z","timestamp":1772077168739,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,23]],"date-time":"2019-04-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1555977600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,31]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>The objective of this study was to characterise thermoluminescent (TLDs) and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) at low X-ray energies and estimate the eye lens (DL), thyroid (DT) and mean glandular (DG) doses received during Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT). The dosimeters were characterised in mammography energies. DL, DT and DG were estimated in FFDM and DBT mode taping dosimeters on the skin of the thyroid gland and on the left eye lens of an Alderson phantom. Dosimeters were also placed on the top of a NORMI PAS phantom simulating a compressed breast. The accuracy, precision and lower limit of detection (LLD) for TLDs and OSLDs were 5 and 8%, 6 and 3%, and 38 and 11 \u03bcSv, respectively. The linearity of the kerma response had an R2 &amp;gt; 0.99 and energy dependence was lower than 40%. DT ranged from 0.40 to 2.87 \u03bcGy for FFDM and 1.27 to 5.99 \u03bcGy for DBT. DG was between 0.50 and 1.27 mGy for FFDM and 1.07 and 1.60 mGy for DBT. DL was below the LLD. Dosimeters showed good performance. DG values were lower than those found in the literature, whereas DT value agreed with references. Differences between DG and DT determined with OSLDs and TLDs were lower than 10% and 200%.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncz052","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,26]],"date-time":"2019-03-26T20:52:29Z","timestamp":1553633549000},"page":"469-478","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["CHARACTERISATION OF TLDS-200 AND OSLDS AT LOW X-RAY ENERGIES AND DETERMINATION OF EYE LENS DOSE, THYROID DOSE AND MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE DURING STANDARD MAMMOGRAPHY AND TOMOSYNTHESIS"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"186","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4414-102X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"R","family":"Pirchio","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Comisi\u00f3n Nacional de Energ\u00eda At\u00f3mica, Av. Pro Gonz\u00e1lez y Arag\u00f3n 15, B1802AYA, Ezeiza, Buenos Aires, Argentina"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Stefanic","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Comisi\u00f3n Nacional de Energ\u00eda At\u00f3mica, Av. Pro Gonz\u00e1lez y Arag\u00f3n 15, B1802AYA, Ezeiza, Buenos Aires, Argentina"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R R","family":"Rojas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centro de Diagn\u00f3stico Rojas, Laprida 1810, C1425EKP, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2443061478","article-title":"Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II Study","volume":"244","author":"Skaane","year":"2007","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C2","author":"National Institute of Health","year":"2018"},{"issue":"2","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.13554","article-title":"Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis","volume":"204","author":"Destounis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C4","year":"2018"},{"issue":"3","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1440-1673.1999.433660.x","article-title":"Investigation of thyroid dose due to mammography","volume":"43","author":"Whelan","year":"1999","journal-title":"Australas. Radiol."},{"issue":"2","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2462070256","article-title":"Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and Phantom study","volume":"246","author":"Sechopoulos","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.7225","article-title":"Mammography and the risk of thyroid cancer","volume":"198","author":"Sechopoulos","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C8","author":"Chetlen","year":"2012"},{"issue":"8","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C9","first-page":"1695","article-title":"Evaluation of radiation dose to skin overlying Thyroid during mammography X-Ray examination at a selected hospital","volume":"2","author":"Herath","year":"2016","journal-title":"Imp. J. Interdiscip. Res."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1002\/acm2.12041","article-title":"Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosemeter in the mammography energy range","volume":"18","author":"Kawaguchi","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys."},{"issue":"7","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4396","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3602456","article-title":"Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range","volume":"38","author":"Al-Senan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C12","author":"Luque","year":"2017"},{"issue":"17","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6384","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/61\/17\/6384","article-title":"Assessment of the mean glandular dose using LiF: Mg, Ti, LiF:Mg, Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu TL detectors in mammography radiation fields","volume":"61","author":"Fartaria","year":"2016","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"issue":"917","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/91138314","article-title":"Towards in vivo TLD dosimetry in mammography","volume":"77","author":"Warren-Forward","year":"2004","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"issue":"4\u20135","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apradiso.2010.01.002","article-title":"Response of TL materials in diagnostic radiology X radiation beam","volume":"68","author":"Maia","year":"2010","journal-title":"Appl. Radiat. Isot."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nima.2007.05.218","article-title":"GEANT4 simulation of the angular dependence of TLD-based monitor response","volume":"580","author":"Guimaraes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A"},{"issue":"3","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082136","article-title":"Investigation of a new TL individual dosemeter for measuring personal dose equivalente Hp(d) on different phantoms","volume":"51","author":"Hua","year":"1994","journal-title":"Radiat. Prot. Dosim."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.13182\/NT11-135","article-title":"Initial MCNP6 release overview","volume":"180","author":"Goorley","year":"2012","journal-title":"Nucl. Technol."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C19","author":"Cristy","year":"1987"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4897","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/49\/21\/004","article-title":"Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography using MCNP4C","volume":"49","author":"Ay","year":"2004","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1919","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/57\/7\/1919","article-title":"Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations","volume":"57","author":"Cunha","year":"2012","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C22","author":"FujiFilm Digital Mammography System","year":"2018"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C23","year":"2018"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C24","year":"2018"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C25","first-page":"83","author":"Perry","year":"2006","edition":"fourth edn"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C26","year":"2018"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C27","author":"Aguerre","year":"2006"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C28","author":"International Atomic Energy Agency","year":"2007"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C29","author":"International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements","year":"1988"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3225","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/45\/11\/308","article-title":"Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol","volume":"45","author":"Dance","year":"2000","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C31","author":"van Engen","year":"2018"},{"issue":"1","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10100570","article-title":"Radiation doses and cancer risk from breast imaging studies","volume":"257","author":"Hendrik","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10100655","article-title":"Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening","volume":"258","author":"Yaffe","year":"2011","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C34","author":"National Health Service","year":"2013"},{"key":"2020040515251698200_ncz052C35","author":"National Health Service","year":"2018"}],"container-title":["Radiation Protection Dosimetry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/rpd\/article-pdf\/186\/4\/469\/32994035\/ncz052.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/rpd\/article-pdf\/186\/4\/469\/32994035\/ncz052.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,5]],"date-time":"2020-04-05T19:25:50Z","timestamp":1586114750000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/rpd\/article\/186\/4\/469\/5476798"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,23]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,23]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,31]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncz052","relation":{},"ISSN":["0144-8420","1742-3406"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0144-8420","type":"print"},{"value":"1742-3406","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,23]]}}}