{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,5]],"date-time":"2026-11-05T01:01:33Z","timestamp":1793840493765,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]],"date-time":"2023-10-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696204800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,23]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>In the management of penile fractures, immediate surgical repair has resulted in better outcomes when compared with a conservative approach; however, there is currently no consensus on the treatment of patients presenting beyond the immediate period (&amp;gt;24\u00a0hours) following injury.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>To examine the latest literature on management strategies in penile fracture and propose an optimal algorithm for the treatment of patients with delayed presentation.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A comprehensive search was conducted following the PRISMA-P 2020 guidelines. A search was performed in several databases with the following strategy: (\u201cPenile fracture\u201d OR \u201cfracture of penis\u201d OR \u201crupture of corpora cavernosa\u201d OR \u201crupture of tunica albuginea\u201d) AND (management OR treatment OR surgery OR \u201csurgical reconstruction\u201d OR \u201csurgical repair\u201d). This resulted in 108 relevant articles. Two independent reviewers screened these articles according to the inclusion criteria. Full-text review of 56 articles was performed, and ultimately 20 studies were selected. Measures included the use of diagnostic imaging, timing of surgical repair (immediate,\u2009&amp;lt;24\u00a0hours after injury; delayed,\u2009&amp;gt;24\u00a0hours), surgical approach, and long-term complications (ie, erectile dysfunction and penile curvature).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The review highlighted the benefits of immediate surgical repair in penile fractures, demonstrating improved patient outcomes. Furthermore, it found that surgical repair should be considered even in cases with delayed presentation (&amp;gt;24\u00a0hours after injury). To better evaluate the long-term impact of delayed surgical intervention on patient outcomes, we recommend standardized postoperative follow-up, with routine assessments of erectile function and penile curvature.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Contemporary literature suggests that immediate and delayed surgical repair of penile fractures leads to adequate postoperative outcomes, and patients presenting &amp;gt;24\u00a0hours after injury should still be considered for surgery.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/sxmrev\/qead041","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,3]],"date-time":"2023-10-03T06:50:50Z","timestamp":1696315850000},"page":"100-105","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["A review of the literature and proposed algorithm for penile fracture management"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Juliet","family":"Hardesty","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Medicine, Indiana University , Indianapolis, IN 46202 , United States"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ramzy T","family":"Burns","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Indiana University , Indianapolis, IN 46202 , United States"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mary E","family":"Soyster","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Indiana University , Indianapolis, IN 46202 , United States"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew","family":"Mellon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Indiana University , Indianapolis, IN 46202 , United States"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Helen L","family":"Bernie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Indiana University , Indianapolis, IN 46202 , United States"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024010313393711100_ref1","volume-title":"Hinman\u2019s Atlas of Urologic Surgery","author":"Smith","year":"2018","edition":"4th"},{"key":"2024010313393711100_ref2","volume-title":"Smith\u2019s General Urology","author":"Tanagho","year":"2008","edition":"17th"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024010313393711100_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sxmr.2017.07.009","article-title":"Current management of penile fracture: an up-to-date systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Falcone","year":"2018","journal-title":"Sex Med Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024010313393711100_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1488","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.05.043","article-title":"Penile fracture: diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of 150 patients","volume":"76","author":"Koifman","year":"2010","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024010313393711100_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.4103\/UA.UA_27_20","article-title":"Penile fracture: institutional experience of 14 cases","volume":"13","author":"Shimpi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Urol Ann"},{"issue":"9","key":"2024010313393711100_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3226","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1743-6109.2010.01879.x","article-title":"US national statistics on penile fracture","volume":"7","author":"Aaronson","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024010313393711100_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1038\/s41443-019-0212-1","article-title":"Surgical reconstruction for penile fracture: a systematic review","volume":"32","author":"Kominsky","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1159\/000444884","article-title":"Penile fracture: a meta-analysis","volume":"96","author":"Amer","year":"2016","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024010313393711100_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)67361-2","article-title":"Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: report of 172 cases","volume":"164","author":"Zargooshi","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024010313393711100_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1038\/ijir.2013.16","article-title":"Which is guilty in self-induced penile fractures: marital status, culture or geographic region? A case series and literature review","volume":"25","author":"Al Ansari","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-7796.157973","article-title":"Alteration in the etiology of penile fracture in the Middle East and Central Asia regions in the last decade; a literature review","volume":"7","author":"Majzoub","year":"2015","journal-title":"Urol Ann"},{"key":"2024010313393711100_ref12","volume-title":"EAU Guidelines on Urological Trauma","author":"Kitrey","year":"2022"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2017.03.38","article-title":"Penile fracture: role of ultrasound","volume":"6","author":"Gupta","year":"2017","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol."},{"issue":"4","key":"2024010313393711100_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.4111\/icu.2017.58.4.255","article-title":"Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of penile fracture: a controlled study","volume":"58","author":"Saglam","year":"2017","journal-title":"Investig Clin Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1111\/andr.12043","article-title":"Acute penile trauma and associated morbidity: 9-year experience at a tertiary care center","volume":"3","author":"Phillips","year":"2015","journal-title":"Andrology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024010313393711100_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.5152\/tud.2016.39129","article-title":"An update of penile fractures: long-term significance of the number of hours elapsed till surgical repair on long-term outcomes","volume":"43","author":"Kozac\u0131o\u011flu","year":"2017","journal-title":"Turk J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024010313393711100_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0b013e3182093113","article-title":"Penile fracture: long-term results of surgical and conservative management","volume":"71","author":"Gamal","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Trauma Acute Care Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"2024010313393711100_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2058","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1743-6109.2009.01296.x","article-title":"Seventeen years\u2019 experience of penile fracture: conservative vs surgical treatment","volume":"6","author":"Yapanoglu","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-013-0531-y","article-title":"Management and outcomes of penile fracture: 10 years\u2019 experience from a tertiary care center","volume":"46","author":"\u00d6zorak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024010313393711100_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000131594.99785.1c","article-title":"Long-term experience with surgical and conservative treatment of penile fracture","volume":"172","author":"Muentener","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1111\/andr.13148","article-title":"Penile fracture: tertiary care center experience and long-term complications after immediate repair","volume":"10","author":"Bulbul","year":"2022","journal-title":"Andrology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref22","article-title":"Sexual function outcomes after surgical treatment of penile fracture","volume":"9","author":"Ouanes","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sex Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024010313393711100_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.4103\/UROS.UROS_58_19","article-title":"Assessment of long-term outcomes with immediate versus delayed surgical repair of penile fractures","volume":"31","author":"Haque","year":"2020","journal-title":"Urological Science"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024010313393711100_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.4103\/UA.UA_80_18","article-title":"Importance of time in management of fracture penis: a prospective study","volume":"11","author":"Patil","year":"2019","journal-title":"Urol Ann"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024010313393711100_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.afju.2017.07.006","article-title":"Management of penile fracture: can it wait?","volume":"24","author":"Naouar","year":"2018","journal-title":"Afr J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024010313393711100_ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2016.02.012","article-title":"Delaying surgical treatment of penile fracture results in poor functional outcomes: results from a large retrospective multicenter European study","volume":"4","author":"Bozzini","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024010313393711100_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1038\/ijir.2017.31","article-title":"Effects of penile fracture and its surgical treatment on psychosocial and sexual function","volume":"29","author":"Bolat","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024010313393711100_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1080\/21681805.2017.1280532","article-title":"Functional outcomes following immediate repair of penile fracture: a tertiary referral centre experience with 76 consecutive patients","volume":"51","author":"De Luca","year":"2017","journal-title":"Scand J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024010313393711100_ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.5152\/tud.2020.20311","article-title":"Sexual function outcomes and risk factors of erectile dysfunction after surgical repair of penile fracture","volume":"47","author":"Sharma","year":"2021","journal-title":"Turk J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acuro.2021.12.004","article-title":"Consequences of penile fracture: complications and long-term functional outcomes","volume":"46","author":"Peradejordi Font","year":"2022","journal-title":"Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)"},{"key":"2024010313393711100_ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajem.2020.08.073","article-title":"Surgical results in penile fracture: our single center experience","volume":"44","author":"Yilmazel","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Emerg Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0367","article-title":"Lessons learned after 20 years\u2019 experience with penile fracture","volume":"46","author":"Barros","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024010313393711100_ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1038\/s41443-019-0159-2","article-title":"Older age and a large tunical tear may be predictors of increased erectile dysfunction rates following penile fracture surgery","volume":"32","author":"Ortac","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"key":"2024010313393711100_ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.11.047","article-title":"Impact of surgical treatment of penile fracture on sexual function","volume":"126","author":"Barros","year":"2019","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024010313393711100_ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1159\/000458448","article-title":"Fractured penis: not so rare!","volume":"99","author":"Tamhankar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"10","key":"2024010313393711100_ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e14568","DOI":"10.1111\/ijcp.14568","article-title":"The role of preoperative ultrasound in the diagnosis of penile fractures and the effect of tunica defect length on postoperative functional outcomes","volume":"75","author":"Yavuzsan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pract"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.21037\/tau-21-957","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of MRI and US in suspicion of penile fracture","volume":"11","author":"Spiesecke","year":"2022","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024010313393711100_ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-017-1550-x","article-title":"The role of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in penile fracture mapping for modified surgical repair","volume":"49","author":"Zare Mehrjardi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"552","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000000211","article-title":"The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of penile fracture in real-life emergency settings: comparative analysis with intraoperative findings","volume":"202","author":"Sokolakis","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024010313393711100_ref40","first-page":"549","article-title":"Contribution of MRI to clinically equivocal penile fracture cases","volume":"22","author":"T\u00fcrkay","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024010313393711100_ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1007\/s40477-016-0195-4","article-title":"The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of penile trauma","volume":"19","author":"Dell\u2019Atti","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Ultrasound"},{"key":"2024010313393711100_ref42","first-page":"330","article-title":"The role of imaging in penile fracture our experience","volume":"90","author":"Izzo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Ital Chir"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024010313393711100_ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1038\/ijir.2016.13","article-title":"Comparison of different approaches to the surgical treatment of penile fractures: quicker return to sexual function with longitudinal incisions","volume":"28","author":"Xu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024010313393711100_ref44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-020-01025-7","article-title":"The management of penile fracture: a review of the literature with special consideration for patients undergoing collagenase clostridium histolyticum injection therapy","volume":"22","author":"Hughes","year":"2021","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024010313393711100_ref45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2017.07.25","article-title":"Suspected penile fracture: to operate or not to operate?","volume":"6","author":"Metzler","year":"2017","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024010313393711100_ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1038\/s41443-020-00383-7","article-title":"Conservative management of suspected fractures in men undergoing collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Peyronie\u2019s disease is not associated with worsening of erectile function","volume":"34","author":"Sharma","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024010313393711100_ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsxm.2016.02.105","article-title":"Results of SMSNA survey regarding complications following intralesional injection therapy with collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Peyronie\u2019s disease","volume":"13","author":"Yafi","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Sex Med"}],"container-title":["Sexual Medicine Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/smr\/article-pdf\/12\/1\/100\/54944267\/qead041.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/smr\/article-pdf\/12\/1\/100\/54944267\/qead041.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,3]],"date-time":"2024-01-03T14:51:57Z","timestamp":1704293517000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/smr\/article\/12\/1\/100\/7287820"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,23]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/sxmrev\/qead041","relation":{},"ISSN":["2050-0513","2050-0521"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2050-0513","type":"print"},{"value":"2050-0521","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]]}}}