{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:06:57Z","timestamp":1786118817828,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Current Opinion in Ophthalmology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1994,4]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/00055735-199404000-00013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,12]],"date-time":"2007-07-12T05:11:08Z","timestamp":1184217068000},"page":"85-98","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Glaucoma drainage implants"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Paul A.","family":"Sidoti","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"George","family":"Baerveldt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","container-title":["Current Opinion in Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00055735-199404000-00013","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T16:47:02Z","timestamp":1786034822000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00055735-199404000-00013"}},"subtitle":[""],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1994,4]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00055735-199404000-00013","relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-8738"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-8738","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1994,4]]}}}