{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,4]],"date-time":"2026-08-04T14:52:32Z","timestamp":1785855152305,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,6]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/01.aco.0000169229.75938.c8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,11]],"date-time":"2005-05-11T04:02:53Z","timestamp":1115784173000},"page":"247-251","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Recent advances in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labour"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Stephen","family":"Halpern","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03028158","article-title":"The routine use of lumbar epidural anaesthesia in obstetrics: a clinical review of 9,532 cases","volume":"7","author":"Eisen","year":"1960","journal-title":"Can Anaesth Soc J"},{"key":"R2-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03010618","article-title":"A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour","volume":"35","author":"Gambling","year":"1988","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R3-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(02)70189-0","article-title":"Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review","volume":"186","author":"Hodnett","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R4-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/S0959-289X(96)80078-1","article-title":"Epidural infusions in labour should be abandoned in favour of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (opposer)","volume":"5","author":"Bogod","year":"1996","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"R5-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/89.3.459","article-title":"Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis","volume":"89","author":"van der Vyver","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R6-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1085","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1399-6576.2003.00207.x","article-title":"PCEA compared to continuous epidural infusion in an ultra-low-dose regimen for labor pain relief: a randomized study","volume":"47","author":"Ledin-Eriksson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R7-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"968","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200404000-00030","article-title":"Background infusion is not beneficial during labor patient-controlled analgesia with 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 microg\/ml sufentanil","volume":"100","author":"Boselli","year":"2004","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R8-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199407000-00015","article-title":"The role of continuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery","volume":"79","author":"Ferrante","year":"1994","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R9-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X9202000103","article-title":"Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour \u2013 is a continuous infusion a benefit?","volume":"20","author":"Paech","year":"1992","journal-title":"Anaesth Intens Care"},{"key":"R10-3-20210129","first-page":"163","article-title":"Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1\/800,000 for labor analgesia: is a background infusion beneficial?","volume":"51","author":"Petry","year":"2000","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Belg"},{"key":"R11-3-20210129","first-page":"A1210","article-title":"RCT comparing the efficacy of PCEA alone vs PCEA + CIEA for ambulatory labor analgesia","volume":"101","author":"Campbell","year":"2004","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R12-3-20210129","first-page":"A1204","article-title":"RCT comparing the effect of PCEA vies PCEA + CIEA on labor outcome","volume":"101","author":"Campbell","year":"2004","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R13-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200309000-00015","article-title":"New techniques for labor analgesia: PCEA and CSE","volume":"46","author":"D'Angelo","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R14-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/S0959-289X(03)00092-X","article-title":"Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor pain: effect on labor, delivery and neonatal outcome of 0.125% bupivacaine vs 0.2% ropivacaine","volume":"13","author":"Evron","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"R15-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1097\/00003643-200401000-00007","article-title":"A multicentre trial comparing different concentrations of ropivacaine plus sufentanil with bupivacaine plus sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour","volume":"21","author":"Gogarten","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R16-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1431","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200306000-00020","article-title":"A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing bupivacaine with ropivacaine for labor analgesia","volume":"98","author":"Halpern","year":"2003","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R17-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2004.03582.x","article-title":"Comparison of patient-controlled epidural bolus administration of 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.1% levobupivacaine, both with 0.0002% fentanyl, for analgesia during labour","volume":"59","author":"Purdie","year":"2004","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R18-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000054168.36798.4A","article-title":"Ropivacaine 0.15% plus sufentanil 0.5 microg\/mL and ropivacaine 0.10% plus sufentanil 0.5 microg\/mL are equivalent for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor","volume":"96","author":"Boselli","year":"2003","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R19-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1800","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000090149.42478.B5","article-title":"Ropivacaine and fentanyl concentrations in patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a volume-range study","volume":"97","author":"Bernard","year":"2003","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1097\/01.aco.0000169229.75938.c8","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,4]],"date-time":"2026-08-04T14:29:26Z","timestamp":1785853766000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00001503-200506000-00003"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,6]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.aco.0000169229.75938.c8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0952-7907"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0952-7907","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,6]]}}}