{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,22]],"date-time":"2026-01-22T01:42:33Z","timestamp":1769046153237,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,10]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/aco.0b013e3283606b71","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,22]],"date-time":"2013-03-22T22:03:37Z","timestamp":1363989817000},"page":"613-620","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Speed spinal anesthesia revisited"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Hinnerk","family":"Wulf","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Karl","family":"Hampl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thorsten","family":"Steinfeldt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aen389","article-title":"Systematic review of spinal anaesthesia using bupivacaine for ambulatory knee arthroscopy.","volume":"102","author":"Nair","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R2-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1213\/ane.0b013e3181806149","article-title":"The duration of intrathecal bupivacaine mixed with lidocaine.","volume":"107","author":"Lee","year":"2008","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R3-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1272","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0b013e31822d676f","article-title":"The addition of lidocaine to bupivacaine does not shorten the duration of spinal anesthesia: a randomized, double-blinded study of patients undergoing knee arthroscopy.","volume":"113","author":"Jacobsen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R4-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"770","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03008286","article-title":"Lidocaine 0.5 spinal anaesthesia: a hypobaric solution for short-stay perirectal surgery.","volume":"39","author":"Bodily","year":"1992","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R5-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03012666","article-title":"Hypobaric spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine (0.1) gives selective sensory block for ano-rectal surgery.","volume":"42","author":"Maroof","year":"1995","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R6-16-20210129","first-page":"113","article-title":"Hypobaric 0.15 bupivacaine versus hypobaric 0.6 lidocaine for posterior spinal anesthesia in outpatient anorectal surgery.","volume":"60","author":"Imbelloni","year":"2010","journal-title":"Rev Bras Anestesiol"},{"key":"R7-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0b013e3181e3a08e","article-title":"Focused review: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for epidural labor analgesia.","volume":"111","author":"Beilin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R8-16-20210129","first-page":"92","article-title":"Pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical use of new long acting local anesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.","volume":"79","author":"Leone","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Biomed"},{"key":"R9-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1399-6576.2003.00092.x","article-title":"Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 3mg fentanyl 10 microg for outpatient knee arthroscopy with tourniquet.","volume":"47","author":"Korhonen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R10-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-003-0350-2","article-title":"Bilateral vs. unilateral spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopies.","volume":"12","author":"Esmaoglu","year":"2004","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"key":"R11-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-200010000-00020","article-title":"Recovery profiles and costs of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.","volume":"91","author":"Song","year":"2000","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R12-16-20210129","first-page":"591","article-title":"Optimal dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 for unilateral spinal anesthesia during diagnostic knee arthroscopy.","volume":"21","author":"Atef","year":"2012","journal-title":"Middle East J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R13-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.2147\/LRA.S19979","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine.","volume":"4","author":"Imbelloni","year":"2011","journal-title":"Local Reg Anesth"},{"key":"R14-16-20210129","first-page":"992","article-title":"A comparison of spinal anesthesia with low-dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for transurethral surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","volume":"76","author":"Hakan Erbay","year":"2010","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"},{"key":"R15-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1007\/s00540-010-1089-9","article-title":"Low-dose ropivacaine or levobupivacaine walking spinal anesthesia in ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy.","volume":"25","author":"Taspinar","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Anesth"},{"key":"R16-16-20210129","first-page":"298","article-title":"Ropivacaine for unilateral spinal anesthesia; hyperbaric or hypobaric Rev Bras A","volume":"62","author":"Canturk","year":"2012","journal-title":"nestesiol"},{"key":"R17-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.101898","article-title":"Use of Articaine in loco-regional anesthesia for day care surgical procedures.","volume":"28","author":"Bajwa","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R18-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.2147\/LRA.S16682","article-title":"Articaine: a review of its use for local and regional anesthesia.","volume":"5","author":"Snoeck","year":"2012","journal-title":"Local Reg Anesth"},{"key":"R19-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aen357","article-title":"Plain articaine or prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia in day-case knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial.","volume":"102","author":"Hendriks","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R20-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/ael222","article-title":"Hyperbaric articaine for day-case spinal anaesthesia.","volume":"97","author":"Kallio","year":"2006","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R21-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aem332","article-title":"Spinal anaesthesia with articaine 5 vs bupivacaine 0.5 for day-case lower limb surgery: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.","volume":"100","author":"Dijkstra","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R22-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199803000-00012","article-title":"Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anaesthesia: a lower incidence with prilocaine and bupivacaine than with lidocaine.","volume":"88","author":"Hampl","year":"1998","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R23-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199803000-00011","article-title":"Incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after hyperbaric subarachnoid anaesthesia with 5 lidocaine and 5 prilocaine.","volume":"88","author":"Martinez-Bourio","year":"1998","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R24-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.2000.01618-4.x","article-title":"The incidence of transient neurological symptoms after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine compared to prilocaine.","volume":"55","author":"de Weert","year":"2000","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R25-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1399-6576.2000.440413.x","article-title":"A randomised study of lidocaine and prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia.","volume":"44","author":"Ostgaard","year":"2000","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R26-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2010.02325.x","article-title":"Chloroprocaine vs. articaine as spinal anaesthetics for day-case knee arthroscopy.","volume":"55","author":"Forster","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R27-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2012.02794.x","article-title":"Hyperbaric articaine with or without fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia: patient and observer blinded comparison.","volume":"57","author":"Kairaluoma","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R28-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0b013e32834a11be","article-title":"Randomised comparison of hyperbaric articaine and hyperbaric low-dose bupivacaine along with fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia for day-case inguinal herniorrhaphy.","volume":"29","author":"Bachmann","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R29-16-20210129","first-page":"5","article-title":"Is 4 articaine suitable for spinal anaesthesia Eur J A","volume":"29","author":"Malinovsky","year":"2012","journal-title":"naesthesiol"},{"key":"R30-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeq272","article-title":"Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanyl.","volume":"106","author":"Black","year":"2011","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R31-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1111\/aas.12031","article-title":"Dosage finding for low-dose spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric prilocaine in patients undergoing perianal outpatient surgery.","volume":"57","author":"Gebhardt","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R32-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2010.02371.x","article-title":"Chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia: a retrospective analysis.","volume":"55","author":"Hejtmanek","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R33-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000221441.44387.82","article-title":"Intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine for lower limb outpatient surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical evaluation.","volume":"103","author":"Casati","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R34-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"959","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000258766.73612.d8","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine or preservative free 2-chlorprocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double blind comparison.","volume":"104","author":"Casati","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R35-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2008.01639.x","article-title":"Spinal 2-Chloroprocaineeffective dose for ambulatory surgery.","volume":"52","author":"Sell","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R36-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1111\/aas.12071","article-title":"The use of 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anaesthesia.","volume":"67","author":"Goldblum","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R37-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-010-9450-x","article-title":"Comparison of bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia for outpatient surgery: a double-blind randomized trial.","volume":"58","author":"Lacasse","year":"2011","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R38-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2011.02599.x","article-title":"Selective spinal anesthesia for outpatient transurethral prostatectomy (TURP): randomized controlled comparison of chloroprocaine with lidocaine.","volume":"56","author":"Vaghadia","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R39-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2010.02325.x","article-title":"Chloroprocaine vs. articaine as spinal anaesthetics for day-case knee arthroscopy.","volume":"55","author":"Forster","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R40-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1111\/aas.12107","article-title":"Chloroprocaine 40mg produces shorter spinal block than articaine 40mg in day case knee arthroscopy patients.","volume":"57","author":"Forster","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R41-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1097\/AIA.0b013e31821bbb35","article-title":"Intrathecal chloroprocaine-not yet safe by US FDA parameters.","volume":"50","author":"Pollock","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Anesthesiol Clin"},{"key":"R42-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.2003.03153.x","article-title":"Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anaesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy.","volume":"58","author":"Kararmaz","year":"2003","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R43-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0b013e3282ff5e41","article-title":"Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section to prevent spinal-induced hypotension.","volume":"21","author":"Roofthooft","year":"2008","journal-title":"Curr Opin Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R44-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-5949.2012.00306.x","article-title":"Combination of low-dose bupivacaine and opioids provides satisfactory analgesia with less intraoperative hypotension for spinal anesthesia in caesarean section.","volume":"18","author":"Qiu","year":"2012","journal-title":"CNS Neurosci Ther"},{"key":"R45-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.08.728","article-title":"Low-dose spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl for operative hysteroscopy: a case series study.","volume":"19","author":"Florio","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"R46-16-20210129","first-page":"CD004350","article-title":"Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section.","volume":"10","author":"Afolabi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R47-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2012.0110","article-title":"Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.","volume":"22","author":"Bessa","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"R48-16-20210129","first-page":"756","article-title":"General versus spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","volume":"10","author":"Mehrabi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"key":"R49-16-20210129","first-page":"217","article-title":"General anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","volume":"60","author":"Imbelloni","year":"2010","journal-title":"Rev Bras Anestesiol"},{"key":"R50-16-20210129","first-page":"257","article-title":"New perspectives for day case spinals!","volume":"55","author":"Wulf","year":"2011","journal-title":"Old drugs for an ancient technique Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R51-16-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0b013e32834aca1b","article-title":"Revival of old local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery.","volume":"24","author":"Forster","year":"2011","journal-title":"Curr Opin Anesthesiol"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00001503-201310000-00016","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,4]],"date-time":"2022-03-04T19:07:31Z","timestamp":1646420851000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00001503-201310000-00016"}},"subtitle":["new drugs and their clinical effects"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,10]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aco.0b013e3283606b71","relation":{},"ISSN":["0952-7907"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0952-7907","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,10]]}}}