{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T02:58:35Z","timestamp":1792119515655,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Anesthesiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The optimal technique to intubate the trachea in patients presenting with a potential or documented cervical spine (C-spine) injury remains unresolved. Using continuous fluoroscopic video assessment, C-spine motion during laryngoscopy with an AirTraq Laryngoscope (King Medical Systems, Newark, DE) was compared to that with intubation using a Macintosh blade.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Twenty-four healthy surgical patients gave written consent to participate in a crossover randomized controlled trial; all patients were subjected to both Macintosh and AirTraq laryngoscopy with manual inline stabilization after induction of anesthesia. The C-spine motion was examined at four areas: the occiput-C1 junction, C1-C2 junction, C2-C5 motion segment, and C5-thoracic motion segment. The time required for laryngoscopy was also measured.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>C-spine motion using the AirTraq was less than that during Macintosh laryngoscopy, averaging 66% less (P &lt; 0.01) at three of the motion segments studied, occiput-C1, C2-C5, and C5-thoracic. There was no difference at the C1-C2 segment. There was no significant difference in the time to accomplish laryngoscopy between the two devices.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>For patients in whom C-spine movement is undesirable, use of the AirTraq Laryngoscope may be useful to limit movement without an increase in the duration of intubation.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/aln.0b013e3181a8649f","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,15]],"date-time":"2009-06-15T03:24:02Z","timestamp":1245036242000},"page":"97-101","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":81,"title":["Cervical Spine Motion"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"111","author":[{"given":"Timothy\u00a0P.","family":"Turkstra","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David\u00a0M.","family":"Pelz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Associate Professor, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Philip\u00a0M.","family":"Jones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R2-21-20251013"},{"key":"R3-21-20251013"},{"key":"R4-21-20251013"},{"key":"R5-21-20251013"},{"key":"R6-21-20251013"},{"key":"R7-21-20251013"},{"key":"R8-21-20251013"},{"key":"R9-21-20251013"},{"key":"R10-21-20251013"},{"key":"R11-21-20251013"},{"key":"R14-21-20251013"},{"key":"R15-21-20251013"},{"key":"R16-21-20251013"}],"container-title":["Anesthesiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/pubs.asahq.org\/anesthesiology\/article-pdf\/111\/1\/97\/657375\/0000542-200907000-00021.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00000542-200907000-00020","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,13]],"date-time":"2025-10-13T16:15:38Z","timestamp":1760372138000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00000542-200907000-00020"}},"subtitle":["A Fluoroscopic Comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versusthe Macintosh Laryngoscope"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,1]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aln.0b013e3181a8649f","relation":{},"ISSN":["0003-3022"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0003-3022","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,1]]}}}