{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:38:04Z","timestamp":1787067484153,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To assess patterns of injury and liability associated with operating room (OR) fires, closed malpractice claims in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Database since 1985 were reviewed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>All claims related to fires in the OR were compared with nonfire-related surgical anesthesia claims. An analysis of fire-related claims was performed to identify causative factors.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      There were 103 OR fire claims (1.9% of 5,297 surgical claims). Electrocautery was the ignition source in 90% of fire claims. OR fire claims more frequently involved older outpatients compared with other surgical anesthesia claims (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.01). Payments to patients were more often made in fire claims (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.01), but payment amounts were lower (median $120,166) compared to nonfire surgical claims (median $250,000,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.01). Electrocautery-induced fires (n = 93) increased over time (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.01) to 4.4% claims between 2000 and 2009. Most (85%) electrocautery fires occurred during head, neck, or upper chest procedures (high-fire-risk procedures). Oxygen served as the oxidizer in 95% of electrocautery-induced OR fires (84% with open delivery system). Most electrocautery-induced fires (n = 75, 81%) occurred during monitored anesthesia care. Oxygen was administered via an open delivery system in all high-risk procedures during monitored anesthesia care. In contrast, alcohol-containing prep solutions and volatile compounds were present in only 15% of OR fires during monitored anesthesia care.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Electrocautery-induced fires during monitored anesthesia care were the most common cause of OR fires claims. Recognition of the fire triad (oxidizer, fuel, and ignition source), particularly the critical role of supplemental oxygen by an open delivery system during use of the electrocautery, is crucial to prevent OR fires. Continuing education and communication among OR personnel along with fire prevention protocols in high-fire-risk procedures may reduce the occurrence of OR fires.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/aln.0b013e31828afa7b","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,16]],"date-time":"2013-02-16T06:38:49Z","timestamp":1360996729000},"page":"1133-1139","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":102,"title":["Operating Room Fires"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"118","author":[{"given":"Sonya P.","family":"Mehta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Resident"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sanjay M.","family":"Bhananker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Associate Professor"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karen L.","family":"Posner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Research Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karen B.","family":"Domino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Professor, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Neurological Surgery (Adjunct), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-20241219","first-page":"141","article-title":"The hazard of fire and explosion in anesthesia: Report of clinical investigation of 230 cases.","volume":"2","year":"1941","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R2-20241219","first-page":"895","article-title":"Hazards of fire and explosion of anesthetic agents. III. In presence of diathermy.","volume":"74","year":"1942","journal-title":"Surg Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R3-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"786","DOI":"10.1097\/01.anes.0000299343.87119.a9","article-title":"Practice advisory for the prevention and management of operating room fires.","volume":"108","year":"2008","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R4-20241219","first-page":"41","article-title":"Surgical fire injuries continue to occur\u2014prevention may require more cautious use of oxygen.","volume":"26","year":"2012","journal-title":"APSF Newsletter"},{"key":"R5-20241219","first-page":"314","article-title":"New clinical guide to surgical fire prevention. Patients can catch fire\u2014here\u2019s how to keep them safer.","volume":"328","year":"2009","journal-title":"Health Devices"},{"key":"R6-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1599","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1989.03420110075027","article-title":"Standard of care and anesthesia liability.","volume":"261","year":"1989","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R7-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1103","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780090917","article-title":"Measuring interrater reliability among multiple raters: An example of methods for nominal data.","volume":"9","year":"1990","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"R8-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1177\/000348949710600313","article-title":"Prevention of flash fires during facial surgery performed under local anesthesia.","volume":"106","year":"1997","journal-title":"Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol"},{"key":"R9-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-200110000-00031","article-title":"Fire in the operating room: A case report and laboratory study.","volume":"93","year":"2001","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R10-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1097\/01.prs.0000196235.01758.f6","article-title":"Misfortune during a blepharoplasty.","volume":"117","year":"2006","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R11-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200602000-00005","article-title":"Injury and liability associated with monitored anesthesia care: A closed claims analysis.","volume":"104","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R12-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijporl.2010.11.005","article-title":"What does it take to start an oropharyngeal fire? Oxygen requirements to start fires in the operating room.","volume":"75","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"R13-20241219","first-page":"352","article-title":"Brief laboratory report: Surgical drape flammability.","volume":"74","year":"2006","journal-title":"AANA J"},{"key":"R14-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200405000-00019","article-title":"Laser ignition of surgical drape materials in air, 50% oxygen, and 95% oxygen.","volume":"100","year":"2004","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R15-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1097\/00006534-199505000-00004","article-title":"Potential dangers of oxygen supplementation during facial surgery.","volume":"95","year":"1995","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R16-20241219","first-page":"153","article-title":"Do oxygen-enriched atmospheres exist beneath surgical drapes and contribute to fire hazard potential in the operating room?","volume":"68","year":"2000","journal-title":"AANA J"},{"key":"R17-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1701","DOI":"10.1097\/01.prs.0000282729.23202.da","article-title":"Operating room fires: Optimizing safety.","volume":"120","year":"2007","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R18-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2008.05820.x","article-title":"Effect of nasal cannula oxygen administration on oxygen concentration at facial and adjacent landmarks.","volume":"64","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R19-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e31825dc14a","article-title":"Operating room fires: Part II. optimizing safety.","volume":"130","year":"2012","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R20-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1407","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000180215.50589.02","article-title":"Reducing the incidence of surgical fires: Supplying nasal cannulae with sub-100% O2 gas mixtures from anesthesia machines.","volume":"101","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R21-20241219","first-page":"702","article-title":"Electrocautery-induced airway fire during tracheostomy.","volume":"71","year":"1990","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R22-20241219","first-page":"259","article-title":"Endotracheal tube cuff ignited by electrocautery during tracheostomy.","volume":"58","year":"1990","journal-title":"AANA J"},{"key":"R23-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1177\/000348949110000105","article-title":"Electrosurgery-induced endotracheal tube ignition during tracheotomy.","volume":"100","year":"1991","journal-title":"Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol"},{"key":"R24-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1576","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199812000-00040","article-title":"Airway fire during tracheostomy: Extubation may be contraindicated.","volume":"89","year":"1998","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R25-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1969.tb02883.x","article-title":"A fire in the mouth: A hazard of the use of antistatic endotracheal tubes.","volume":"24","year":"1969","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R26-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-198607000-00012","article-title":"Endotracheal tube fire ignited by pharyngeal electrocautery.","volume":"65","year":"1986","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R27-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2005.09.032","article-title":"Electrocautery-induced fire during adenotonsillectomy: Report of two cases.","volume":"18","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R28-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjoto.2009.11.004","article-title":"Operating room fires in otolaryngology: Risk factors and prevention.","volume":"32","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Otolaryngol"},{"key":"R29-20241219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199107253250405","article-title":"Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III.","volume":"325","year":"1991","journal-title":"NEngl J Med"}],"container-title":["Anesthesiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/pubs.asahq.org\/anesthesiology\/article-pdf\/118\/5\/1133\/261716\/20130500_0-00024.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org\/article.aspx?volume=118&page=1133","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,3]],"date-time":"2025-01-03T09:46:51Z","timestamp":1735897611000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/ALN.0b013e31828afa7b"}},"subtitle":["A Closed Claims Analysis"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,5]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aln.0b013e31828afa7b","relation":{},"ISSN":["0003-3022"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0003-3022","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,5]]}}}