{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,12]],"date-time":"2026-06-12T14:52:58Z","timestamp":1781275978241,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000000082","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,8]],"date-time":"2014-01-08T09:09:19Z","timestamp":1389172159000},"page":"304-308","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Safety of Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in Grandmultiparous Women"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"123","author":[{"given":"Hila","family":"Hochler","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Haim","family":"Yaffe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Philippe","family":"Schwed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Mankuta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R2-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.","volume":"118","author":"Barber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R3-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R4-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R5-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.04.002","article-title":". Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study.","volume":"193","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R6-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","article-title":"; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"108","author":"Landon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R7-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00675-6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of the literature.","volume":"189","author":"Chauhan","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R8-12-20210126","first-page":"749","article-title":"A 10-year population-based study of uterine rupture.","volume":"100","author":"Kieser","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R9-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f","article-title":". Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes.","volume":"115","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R10-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.03.005","article-title":"Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"34","author":"Landon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"R11-12-20210126","first-page":"1148","article-title":"Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted Am J Obstet G","volume":"195","author":"Macones","year":"2006","journal-title":"ynecol"},{"key":"R12-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00833-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: trial of labor or repeat cesarean section A decision analysis.","volume":"189","author":"Mankuta","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R13-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2006-947158","article-title":"Grandmultiparas in modern obstetrics.","volume":"23","author":"Nassar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R14-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(85)90027-X","article-title":"The grand multiparais it a problem A review of 5785 cases.","volume":"23","author":"Fuchs","year":"1985","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R15-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2010.01476.x","article-title":"Impact of grandmultiparity on obstetric outcome in low resource setting.","volume":"37","author":"Agrawal","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"R16-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70511-9","article-title":"Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors.","volume":"181","author":"Babinszki","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R17-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0490-6","article-title":"The safety of a trial of labor after cesarean section in a grandmultiparous population.","volume":"277","author":"Kugler","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R18-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-002-0472-7","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section in grand multiparous women.","volume":"270","author":"Yamani Zamzami","year":"2004","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R19-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1341-8076.2002.00025.x","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcome of women para or = 5 incl 5 including one lower segment cesarean section.","volume":"28","author":"Ali","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"R20-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1997.tb00835.x","article-title":"Vaginal delivery in the grand multipara following previous lower segment cesarian section.","volume":"23","author":"Dyack","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"R21-12-20210126","first-page":"450","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 115. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.","volume":"116","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R22-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5","article-title":"National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010.","volume":"115","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R23-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1184","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109048","article-title":"Effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor.","volume":"183","author":"Zelop","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R24-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9","article-title":". Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean.","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R25-12-20210126","first-page":"465","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 342. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.","volume":"108","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R26-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery.","volume":"183","author":"Ravasia","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R27-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70319-4","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid woman with one prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"181","author":"Zelop","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R29-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2012-0103","article-title":". Induction of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: lessons from a population-based study.","volume":"41","author":"Shatz","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"R30-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117361","article-title":"Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing 4000 g.","volume":"185","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R31-12-20210126","first-page":"694","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication Obstet G","volume":"74","author":"Flamm","year":"1989","journal-title":"ynecol"},{"key":"R32-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c915da","article-title":". Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.","volume":"115","author":"Jastrow","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R33-12-20210126","first-page":"87","article-title":"Blackwell SC; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin: shoulder dystocia. Number 40, November 2002. (Replaces practice pattern number 7, October 1997).","volume":"80","author":"Sokol","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R34-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.1999.780813.x","article-title":"Labor abnormalities as a risk factor for shoulder dystocia.","volume":"78","author":"Gemer","year":"1999","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000082","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,22]],"date-time":"2024-05-22T17:39:32Z","timestamp":1716399572000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00006250-201402000-00012"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000000082","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-7844"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-7844","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]}}}