{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:20:55Z","timestamp":1786119655420,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,10]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0b013e3181888fd8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,30]],"date-time":"2010-11-30T07:28:28Z","timestamp":1291102108000},"page":"913-918","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":56,"title":["Mode of Delivery: Toward Responsible Inclusion of Patient Preferences"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"112","author":[{"given":"Margaret Olivia","family":"Little","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne Drapkin","family":"Lyerly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisa M.","family":"Mitchell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth M.","family":"Armstrong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisa H.","family":"Harris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rebecca","family":"Kukla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miriam","family":"Kuppermann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-25-20210126","first-page":"203","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 54. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.","volume":"104","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R2-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2007.00190.x","article-title":"Changing policies on vaginal birth after cesarean: impact on access.","volume":"34","author":"Roberts","year":"2007","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R3-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsb022734","article-title":"Elective primary cesarean delivery.","volume":"348","author":"Minkoff","year":"2003","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R4-25-20210126","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2005.","volume":"56","author":"Martin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"R5-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000260387.69720.5d","article-title":"Intrapartum management of twin gestations.","volume":"109","author":"Cruikshank","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R6-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00631.x","article-title":"Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births.","volume":"112","author":"Smith","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R7-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.64","article-title":"Cesarean delivery for twins: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"188","author":"Hogle","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R8-25-20210126","first-page":"869","article-title":"Multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 56.","volume":"104","year":"2004","journal-title":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R9-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial.","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R10-25-20210126","first-page":"1189","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 265.","volume":"98","year":"2001","journal-title":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-25-20210126","first-page":"235","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340.","volume":"108","year":"2006","journal-title":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R12-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000267199.32847.c4","article-title":"Obstetric trainees' experience in vaginal breech delivery: implications for future practice.","volume":"110","author":"Chinnock","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R13-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000249608.11864.b6","article-title":"Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetricians-gynecologists' knowledge, perception and practice.","volume":"109","author":"Bettes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R14-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1386","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200606000-00027","article-title":"National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27\u201329, 2006.","volume":"107","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R15-25-20210126","first-page":"1501","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394.","volume":"110","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists"},{"key":"R16-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.04.009","article-title":"Neonatal morbidity in second twin according to gestational age at birth and mode of delivery.","volume":"191","author":"Wen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R17-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1638","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.03.007","article-title":"Emergent (crash) cesarean delivery: indications and outcomes.","volume":"194","author":"Lagrew","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00833-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis.","volume":"189","author":"Mankuta","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R19-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"770","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2006.00105.x","article-title":"Development of the Optimality Index as a new approach to evaluating outcomes of maternity care.","volume":"35","author":"Murphy","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs"},{"key":"R20-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.324.7343.942","article-title":"Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods.","volume":"324","author":"B\u00e9hague","year":"2002","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006250-200810000-00025","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T18:45:49Z","timestamp":1786041949000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006250-200810000-00025"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,10]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0b013e3181888fd8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-7844"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-7844","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,10]]}}}