{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T02:39:48Z","timestamp":1792031988799,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,6]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0b013e3181df925f","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,19]],"date-time":"2010-05-19T03:29:39Z","timestamp":1274239779000},"page":"1267-1278","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":296,"title":["Vaginal Birth After Cesarean"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"115","author":[{"given":"Jeanne-Marie","family":"Guise","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mary Anna","family":"Denman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cathy","family":"Emeis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicole","family":"Marshall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miranda","family":"Walker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rongwei","family":"Fu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rosalind","family":"Janik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peggy","family":"Nygren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karen B.","family":"Eden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marian","family":"McDonagh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"issue":"16","key":"R3-25-20210728","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: Preliminary data for 2008.","volume":"58","author":"Hamilton","year":"2010","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"R4-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.73.8.861","article-title":"Cesarean section delivery rates: United States, 1981.","volume":"73","author":"Placek","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"R8-25-20210728","article-title":"The world factbook.","year":"2008"},{"key":"R9-25-20210728","first-page":"1","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).","author":"Guise","year":"2003","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ)"},{"key":"R10-25-20210728","first-page":"1","article-title":"Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2005.","volume":"57","author":"MacDorman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"R11-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(94)00097-A","article-title":"Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis.","volume":"48","author":"Slavin","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"R12-25-20210728","article-title":"Methods reference guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews, version 1.0.","year":"2007"},{"key":"R13-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"iii","DOI":"10.3310\/hta7270","article-title":"Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.","volume":"7","author":"Deeks","year":"2003","journal-title":"Health Tech Assess"},{"key":"R14-25-20210728","article-title":"Practical statistics for medical research.","author":"Altman","year":"1991"},{"key":"R15-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-4-38","article-title":"Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.","volume":"4","author":"Atkins","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMC Health Services Research"},{"key":"R16-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials.","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","year":"1986","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"R17-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3417","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3417::AID-SIM614>3.0.CO;2-L","article-title":"A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.","volume":"19","author":"Turner","year":"2000","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"R18-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.03.016","article-title":"The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability.","volume":"61","author":"Hamza","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"R19-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1761","article-title":"What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.","volume":"23","author":"Sweeting","year":"2004","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"R20-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1479","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7300.1479","article-title":"Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees.","volume":"322","author":"Lewis","year":"2001","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R21-25-20210728","article-title":"Methods for meta-analysis in medical research.","author":"Sutton","year":"2000"},{"key":"R22-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2693","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0258(19991030)18:20<2693::AID-SIM235>3.0.CO;2-V","article-title":"Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.","volume":"18","author":"Thompson","year":"1999","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"R23-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00416-4","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section in a population with a low overall caesarean section rate.","volume":"96","author":"Bais","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"R24-25-20210728","first-page":"3","article-title":"Outcome of a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"29","author":"Eglinton","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"R25-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999621","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity to elective repeat cesarean section.","volume":"6","author":"Eriksen","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R26-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00005","article-title":"Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study.","volume":"83","author":"Flamm","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R27-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.008","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome.","volume":"198","author":"Gregory","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R28-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668653","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.","volume":"15","author":"Loebel","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"R29-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90746-9","article-title":"Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth.","volume":"146","author":"Martin","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R30-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1998.tb00063.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results in 310 pregnancies.","volume":"24","author":"Obara","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"R31-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1510","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(87)80252-1","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean.","volume":"157","author":"Phelan","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R32-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000284622.71222.b2","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery.","volume":"110","author":"Spong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R33-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1263","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.022","article-title":"Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery.","volume":"191","author":"Wen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R34-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70319-4","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"181","author":"Zelop","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R35-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.045","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?.","volume":"195","author":"Cahill","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R36-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0","article-title":"Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries.","volume":"181","author":"Caughey","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R37-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00006","article-title":"Trial of labor following cesarean delivery.","volume":"83","author":"Cowan","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R38-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199011000-00004","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study.","volume":"76","author":"Flamm","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R39-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(88)90224-4","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: results of a multicenter study.","volume":"158","author":"Flamm","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R40-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R41-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115044","article-title":"Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity.","volume":"184","author":"Hibbard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R42-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0490-6","article-title":"The safety of a trial of labor after cesarean section in a grandmultiparous population.","volume":"277","author":"Kugler","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R43-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.116729","article-title":"Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section.","volume":"185","author":"Chauhan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R44-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001724290","article-title":"Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure.","volume":"15","author":"Durnwald","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"R45-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31","article-title":"Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery.","volume":"108","author":"Hibbard","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R47-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R48-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2003-38317","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a small rural community with a solo practice.","volume":"20","author":"Upadhyaya","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R49-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1990.tb00722.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after two or more cesarean sections: a five-year experience.","volume":"17","author":"Hansell","year":"1990","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R50-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.10.018","article-title":"Effect of gestational age at the prior cesarean delivery on maternal morbidity in subsequent VBAC attempt.","volume":"200","author":"Harper","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R51-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1994.22.1.13","article-title":"The management of labor in women with more than one uterine scar: is a repeat cesarean section really the only \u201csafe\u201d option?","volume":"22","author":"Granovsky-Grisaru","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"R52-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"108","author":"Landon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R53-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries.","volume":"107","author":"Silver","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R54-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000149150.93552.78","article-title":"Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery.","volume":"105","author":"Phipps","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R55-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30542-4","article-title":"Neonatal morbidity and decision-delivery interval in patients with uterine rupture.","volume":"27","author":"Bujold","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"R56-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.034","article-title":"The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.","volume":"192","author":"Richardson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R57-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2006.037","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: X-ray pelvimetry at term is informative.","volume":"34","author":"Sibony","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"R58-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2684","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.20.2684","article-title":"Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies.","volume":"287","author":"Smith","year":"2002","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R59-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.303.6806.818","article-title":"Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region.","volume":"303","author":"Paterson","year":"1991","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R60-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1523-536X.2003.00225.x","article-title":"Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section.","volume":"30","author":"Fisler","year":"2003","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R61-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a66d57","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery.","volume":"113","author":"Kamath","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R62-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1373","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.02.051","article-title":"Prior cesarean delivery is not associated with an increased risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy: analysis of U.S. perinatal mortality data, 1995\u20131997.","volume":"195","author":"Bahtiyar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R63-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1779","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)14896-9","article-title":"Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy.","volume":"362","author":"Smith","year":"2003","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R64-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1187","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.108890","article-title":"Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999.","volume":"183","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R65-25-20210728","first-page":"1","article-title":"Maternal mortality and related concepts.","author":"Hoyert","year":"2007","journal-title":"Vital Health Stat 3"},{"key":"R66-25-20210728","first-page":"1","article-title":"Deaths: final data for 2005.","volume":"56","author":"Kung","year":"2008","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"R67-25-20210728","first-page":"1","article-title":"Deaths: final data for 2004.","volume":"55","author":"Mini\u00f1o","year":"2007","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"R68-25-20210728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.03.009","article-title":"AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions\u2013agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.","volume":"63","author":"Owens","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006250-201006000-00025","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T18:21:16Z","timestamp":1786040476000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006250-201006000-00025"}},"subtitle":["New Insights on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,6]]},"references-count":62,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0b013e3181df925f","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-7844"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-7844","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,6]]}}}