{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T14:31:41Z","timestamp":1792074701856,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,10]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0b013e3181f2de49","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,22]],"date-time":"2010-09-22T15:52:36Z","timestamp":1285170756000},"page":"967-981","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":87,"title":["New Insights on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"116","author":[{"given":"Karen B.","family":"Eden","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marian","family":"McDonagh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mary Anna","family":"Denman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicole","family":"Marshall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cathy","family":"Emeis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rongwei","family":"Fu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rosalind","family":"Janik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miranda","family":"Walker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeanne-Marie","family":"Guise","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-25-20210126","article-title":"Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights. Evidence Report\/Technology Assessment No. 191. (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 10-E001.","author":"Guise","year":"2010"},{"key":"R2-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.045","article-title":"Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of prognostic factors and screening tools.","volume":"190","author":"Hashima","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R3-25-20210126","first-page":"1","article-title":"NIH Consensus Statement Online.","volume":"3","year":"1980","journal-title":""},{"key":"R4-25-20210126","article-title":"The World Factbook 2008.","year":"2008"},{"key":"R5-25-20210126","article-title":"Methods Reference Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, Version 1.0.","year":"2007"},{"key":"R6-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"iii","DOI":"10.3310\/hta7270","article-title":"Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.","volume":"7","author":"Deeks","year":"2003","journal-title":"Health Tech Assess"},{"key":"R7-25-20210126","article-title":"Practical Statistics for Medical Research.","author":"Altman","year":"1991"},{"key":"R8-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials.","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","year":"1986","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"R9-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","article-title":"Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.","volume":"21","author":"Higgins","year":"2002","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"R10-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00531-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system.","volume":"90","author":"Flamm","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","article-title":"Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R12-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1239494","article-title":"Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?","volume":"26","author":"Grobman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R13-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.075","article-title":"Modified Bishop's score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery.","volume":"191","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R14-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181bb0dde","article-title":"Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.","volume":"114","author":"Costantine","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R15-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000110544.42128.7a","article-title":"Predicting failed trial of labor after primary cesarean delivery.","volume":"103","author":"Dinsmoor","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R16-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-835961","article-title":"Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: a proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score.","volume":"21","author":"Gonen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R17-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.10.884","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: a prenatal scoring tool.","volume":"196","author":"Hashima","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-25-20210126","first-page":"729","article-title":"Evaluation of prognostic factors for vaginal delivery after cesarean section.","volume":"38","author":"Jakobi","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"R19-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e252","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020252","article-title":"Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section.","volume":"2","author":"Smith","year":"2005","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"R20-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)80046-9","article-title":"Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system.","volume":"167","author":"Troyer","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R21-25-20210126","first-page":"332","article-title":"Predicting the success of a trial of labor with a simple scoring system.","volume":"45","author":"Vinueza","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R22-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70393-9","article-title":"Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section.","volume":"174","author":"Weinstein","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R23-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109386","article-title":"Predicting outcomes of trials of labor in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a comparison of multivariate methods with neural networks.","volume":"184","author":"Macones","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"R24-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1811","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91572-R","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: are there useful and valid predictors of success or failure?","volume":"166","author":"Pickhardt","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R25-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1430","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b605","article-title":"Prognosis and prognostic research: validating prognostic model.","volume":"338","author":"Altman","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R26-25-20210126","first-page":"S64","article-title":"Can a VBAC scoring system predict uterine rupture in patients attempting a trial of labor?","author":"Alamia","year":"1999"},{"key":"R27-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08361.x","article-title":"The utility of clinical tests of eligibility for a trial of labour following a caesarean section: a decision analysis.","volume":"106","author":"Macones","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R28-25-20210126","first-page":"1192","article-title":"Predicting the likelihood of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.","volume":"76","author":"Ebell","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"R29-25-20210126","first-page":"162","article-title":"Assessing the Fit of the Model. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed.","author":"Hosmer","year":"2000"},{"key":"R30-25-20210126","first-page":"190","article-title":"Decision making in health and medicine. Integrating Evidence and values.","author":"Hunink","year":"2001"},{"issue":"3","key":"R31-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","article-title":"The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.","volume":"193","author":"Landon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R32-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619609030044","article-title":"Factors affecting mode of delivery in labour following a single previous birth by cesarean.","volume":"16","author":"Stronge","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R33-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2003.09.002","article-title":"Predictors of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section.","volume":"85","author":"Cameron","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R34-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0","article-title":"Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries.","volume":"181","author":"Caughey","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R35-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwm363","article-title":"Effect of hospital volume on maternal outcomes in women with prior cesarean delivery undergoing trial of labor.","volume":"167","author":"Chang","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"R36-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139516.43748.1b","article-title":"Increased success of trial of labor after previous vaginal birth after cesarean.","volume":"104","author":"Gyamfi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R37-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1994.03520070044036","article-title":"Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.","volume":"272","author":"King","year":"1994","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R38-25-20210126","first-page":"257","article-title":"Predictors of repeat cesarean delivery after trial of labor: do any exist?","volume":"182","author":"Learman","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"R39-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03126.x","article-title":"Induction of labour after 1 previous Caesarean section.","volume":"39","author":"McNally","year":"1999","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R40-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000153493.15922.85","article-title":"The effect of prematurity on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: success and maternal morbidity.","volume":"105","author":"Quinones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R41-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.03.008","article-title":"Preferred and actual delivery mode after a cesarean in London, UK.","volume":"102","author":"Selo-Ojeme","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"R42-25-20210126","first-page":"913","article-title":"Labor after previous cesarean: influence of prior indication and parity.","volume":"95","author":"Shipp","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R43-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00464-X","article-title":"Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour.","volume":"100","author":"Spaans","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"R44-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259313.46842.71","article-title":"Predicting failure of a vaginal birth attempt after cesarean delivery.","volume":"109","author":"Srinivas","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R45-25-20210126","first-page":"391","article-title":"Trial of labor after 40 weeks' gestation in women with prior cesarean.","volume":"97","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R46-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117361","article-title":"Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g.","volume":"185","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R47-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318163be22","article-title":"Racial disparity in the success and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.","volume":"111","author":"Cahill","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R48-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70192-9","article-title":"Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the effect of previous vaginal delivery.","volume":"179","author":"Caughey","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R49-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00046-X","article-title":"Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at cesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.","volume":"89","author":"Hoskins","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R50-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000154154.02581.ce","article-title":"Racial differences in cesareans: an analysis of U.S. 2001 National Inpatient Sample Data [published erratum appears in Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1495].","volume":"105","author":"Kabir","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R51-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.04.002","article-title":"Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study.","volume":"193","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R52-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.186","article-title":"The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates.","volume":"188","author":"Elkousy","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"R53-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816102b9","article-title":"Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery.","volume":"111","author":"Mercer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R54-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1517","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.03.041","article-title":"The role of maternal body mass index in outcomes of vaginal births after cesarean.","volume":"193","author":"Bujold","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R55-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1516","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.472","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes.","volume":"188","author":"Carroll","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R56-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.116729","article-title":"Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section.","volume":"185","author":"Chauhan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R57-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.051","article-title":"The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success.","volume":"191","author":"Durnwald","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R58-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.075","article-title":"Obesity as a risk factor for failed trial of labor in patients with previous cesarean delivery.","volume":"192","author":"Goodall","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R59-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31","article-title":"Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery.","volume":"108","author":"Hibbard","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R60-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000177972.32941.65","article-title":"Effect of body mass index and excessive weight gain on success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.","volume":"106","author":"Juhasz","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R61-25-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500223465","article-title":"A review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: vagaries of accuracy.","volume":"18","author":"Chauhan","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f2de49","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T18:34:36Z","timestamp":1786041276000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006250-201010000-00025"}},"subtitle":["Can It Be Predicted?"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,10]]},"references-count":61,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0b013e3181f2de49","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-7844"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-7844","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,10]]}}}