{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T20:28:29Z","timestamp":1793392109065,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0b013e31821188ad","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,21]],"date-time":"2011-04-21T03:33:50Z","timestamp":1303356830000},"page":"1105-1113","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":452,"title":["Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"117","author":[{"given":"Jeffrey F.","family":"Peipert","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qiuhong","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jenifer E.","family":"Allsworth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emiko","family":"Petrosky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tessa","family":"Madden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Eisenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gina","family":"Secura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-12-20210126","first-page":"1","article-title":"Use of contraception in the United States: 1982\u20132008.","volume":"29","author":"Mosher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Vital Health Stat 23"},{"key":"R2-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181cf45dc","article-title":"Adherence and acceptability of the contraceptive ring compared with the pill among students: a randomized controlled trial.","volume":"115","author":"Gilliam","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R3-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70047-X","article-title":"Oral contraceptive discontinuation: a prospective evaluation of frequency and reasons.","volume":"179","author":"Rosenberg","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R4-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.013","article-title":"Pharmacist-administered subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a pilot randomized controlled trial.","volume":"82","author":"Picardo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R5-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00194-9","article-title":"Experiences of injectable contraceptive users in an urban setting.","volume":"88","author":"Sangi-Haghpeykar","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R6-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.2307\/2136058","article-title":"Continuation rates among injectable contraceptive users.","volume":"28","author":"Westfall","year":"1996","journal-title":"Fam Plann Perspect"},{"key":"R7-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.02.020","article-title":"Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women.","volume":"82","author":"Fleming","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R8-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.08.002","article-title":"Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes.","volume":"81","author":"Madden","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R9-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318202b4c9","article-title":"Women's knowledge about intrauterine contraception.","volume":"117","author":"Hladky","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R10-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.05.009","article-title":"Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race\/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.","volume":"203","author":"Dehlendorf","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2007.129353","article-title":"Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program.","volume":"99","author":"Foster","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"R12-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.017","article-title":"The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.","volume":"203","author":"Secura","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R13-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"940","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwg074","article-title":"Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.","volume":"157","author":"McNutt","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"R14-12-20210126","article-title":"Repeat abortion in the United States. Occasional Report No. 29.","author":"Jones","year":"2006"},{"key":"R15-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1363\/3809006","article-title":"Disparities in the rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.","volume":"38","author":"Finer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"R16-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1363\/4009408","article-title":"Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004.","volume":"40","author":"Frost","year":"2008","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"R17-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.06.008","article-title":"Contraceptive discontinuation attributed to method dissatisfaction in the United States.","volume":"76","author":"Moreau","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R18-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.05.005","article-title":"Non-contraceptive health benefits of intrauterine hormonal systems.","volume":"82","author":"Fraser","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R19-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.09.004","article-title":"Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14\u201318 years: a multicenter randomized pilot study of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the Copper T 380A.","volume":"81","author":"Godfrey","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R20-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.11.008","article-title":"Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study.","volume":"69","author":"Suhonen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R21-12-20210126","first-page":"759","article-title":"Contraceptive technology, 19th revised ed.","author":"Trussell","year":"2007"},{"key":"R22-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.11.007","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel.","volume":"71","author":"Funk","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R23-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.06.007","article-title":"Clinical experience and acceptability of the etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implant.","volume":"90","author":"Flores","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R24-12-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.03.021","article-title":"Implanon users are less likely to be satisfied with their contraception after 6 months than IUD users.","volume":"80","author":"Wong","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821188ad","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T19:17:39Z","timestamp":1786043859000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006250-201105000-00012"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0b013e31821188ad","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-7844"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-7844","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]}}}