{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T00:40:05Z","timestamp":1791506405113,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0b013e31821e5f65","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,6,4]],"date-time":"2011-06-04T04:19:41Z","timestamp":1307161181000},"page":"29-38","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":551,"title":["Indications Contributing to the Increasing Cesarean Delivery Rate"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"118","author":[{"given":"Emma L.","family":"Barber","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisbet S.","family":"Lundsberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kathleen","family":"Belanger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christian M.","family":"Pettker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Edmund F.","family":"Funai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessica L.","family":"Illuzzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-5-20210126","article-title":"Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief No. 35.","author":"Menacker","year":"2010"},{"key":"R2-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251","article-title":"Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 115.","volume":"116","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R3-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"867","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2004.052381","article-title":"Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991\u20132002.","volume":"96","author":"Declercq","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"R4-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38279.705336.0B","article-title":"Rise in \u201cno indicated risk\u201d primary caesareans in the United States, 1991\u20132001: cross sectional analysis.","volume":"330","author":"Declercq","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R5-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.111.S1.1181","article-title":"Contribution of excess weight gain during pregnancy and macrosomia to the cesarean delivery rate, 1990\u20132000.","volume":"111","author":"Rhodes","year":"2003","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"R6-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.019","article-title":"Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the United States.","volume":"195","author":"Reddy","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R7-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2008.03.007","article-title":"Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.","volume":"35","author":"MacDorman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"R8-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2006.07.002","article-title":"Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology.","volume":"30","author":"Menacker","year":"2006","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"R9-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00105.x","article-title":"Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999\u20132004.","volume":"33","author":"Denk","year":"2006","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R10-5-20210126","first-page":"1","article-title":"Expanded health data from the new birth certificate, 2006.","volume":"58","author":"Osterman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"R11-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1506","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000242564.79349.b7","article-title":"Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004.","volume":"108","author":"Gossman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R12-5-20210126","first-page":"996","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean birth-California, 1996\u20132000.","volume":"51","year":"2002","journal-title":"MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep"},{"key":"R13-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450108","article-title":"Vaginal delivery after cesarean section-is the risk acceptable?","volume":"345","author":"Greene","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R14-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery.","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R15-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200204000-00038","article-title":"Induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 271.","volume":"99","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R16-5-20210126","first-page":"189","article-title":"Approach VBAC deliveries cautiously, experts say.","volume":"23","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hosp Peer Rev"},{"key":"R17-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(99)80021-6","article-title":"Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 5.","volume":"66","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R18-5-20210126","first-page":"1101","article-title":"Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 289.","volume":"102","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R19-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.07.062","article-title":"Racial and ethnic disparities in the trends in primary cesarean delivery based on indications.","volume":"201","author":"Getahun","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R20-5-20210126","first-page":"214","article-title":"The reproducibility of intrapartum cardiotocogram assessments.","volume":"127","author":"Beaulieu","year":"1982","journal-title":"Can Med Assoc J"},{"key":"R21-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348709022046","article-title":"Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms.","volume":"66","author":"Nielsen","year":"1987","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"R22-5-20210126","first-page":"367","article-title":"Interpreting the fetal heart rate tracing. Effect of knowledge of neonatal outcome.","volume":"43","author":"Zain","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"R24-5-20210126","first-page":"1","article-title":"Expanded health data from the new birth certificate, 2005.","volume":"56","author":"Menacker","year":"2008","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"R25-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.058","article-title":"Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.","volume":"203","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R27-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1299","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a45b25","article-title":"Hypertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the United States.","volume":"113","author":"Kuklina","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R28-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181954e5b","article-title":"Severe obstetric morbidity in the United States: 1998\u20132005.","volume":"113","author":"Kuklina","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R29-5-20210126","first-page":"67","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.","volume":"77","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R32-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318190bb33","article-title":"Cesarean delivery among women with low-risk pregnancies: a comparison of birth certificates and hospital discharge data.","volume":"113","author":"Kahn","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R33-5-20210126","first-page":"1078","article-title":"The use of missing birth record data as a marker for adverse reproductive outcomes: a geocoded analysis of birth record data.","volume":"98","author":"Headley","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Natl Med Assoc"},{"key":"R34-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1264","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000287294.89148.23","article-title":"Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates.","volume":"110","author":"Murthy","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R35-5-20210126","first-page":"139","article-title":"Change in cesarean section rate as a reflection of the present malpractice crisis.","volume":"69","author":"Ryan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Conn Med"},{"key":"R36-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1271213","article-title":"Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: A nationwide analysis on obstetric practice.","volume":"28","author":"Zwecker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R37-5-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d9f4b6","article-title":"Evaluating the risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality.","volume":"115","author":"Srinivas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T19:27:36Z","timestamp":1786044456000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006250-201107000-00005"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0b013e31821e5f65","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-7844"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-7844","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]}}}