{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,9]],"date-time":"2026-11-09T16:52:10Z","timestamp":1794243130243,"version":"4.9.0"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Does restoration of articular congruity have any effect on long-term outcome following tibial plateau fracture?<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Cohort study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A secondary hospital in New Zealand, which services a population of 150,000.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>All patients with a depressed tibial plateau fracture seen over a 6 year period were invited to participate in the study. There were 41 patients (average age 54 years) recruited from an eligible population of 97. Average follow-up was 3.9 years after injury.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Intervention:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients had either been treated operatively or nonoperatively after depressed tibial plateau fracture.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcome Measurements:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The primary outcome analyzed was residual articular depression (as measured on coronal plane tomogram) and its effect on clinical outcome [Oxford Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Iowa knee score, and a visual analogue satisfaction score] and functional outcome (knee range of motion) at a minimum of 12 months after fracture. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the amount of articular depression: &lt;2.5, 2.5\u20135.0, and \u22655.0 mm. The secondary outcome analyzed was mechanical axis (as measured on weightbearing long leg alignment radiographs) and its effect on clinical and functional outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Statistical analysis found that patients with &lt;2.5 mm of articular depression had significantly smaller losses in knee range of motion (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.000), better Oxford (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.006), Iowa (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.003), and KOOS symptom (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.011) and pain (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.001) scores. We found that there was no significant relationship between restoration of mechanical axis and loss in range of motion (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.126), Oxford (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.584), WOMAC (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.101), IOWA (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.418), Visual Analogue Score (VAS) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.466) or any subgroup within the KOOS survey other than activities of daily living (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.029).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study found that patients with smaller amounts of residual articular depression at a minimum of 12 months after tibial plateau fracture had significantly smaller losses in knee range of motion and better functional outcomes than those with greater amounts of articular depression.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/bot.0000000000000762","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,15]],"date-time":"2016-12-15T11:06:39Z","timestamp":1481799999000},"page":"158-163","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":123,"title":["Outcome After Tibial Plateau Fracture: How Important Is Restoration of Articular Congruity?"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"Neal","family":"Singleton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vahe","family":"Sahakian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dawson","family":"Muir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.3109\/17453677108989057","article-title":"Fractures of the tibial condyles","volume":"42","author":"Lucht","year":"1971","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Scand."},{"key":"R2-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197355070-00001","article-title":"Tibial condyle fractures: impairment of knee joint stability as an indication for surgical treatment","volume":"55","author":"Rasmussen","year":"1973","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R3-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.72B1.2298794","article-title":"Tibial plateau fractures: a comparison of conservative and surgical treatment","volume":"72","author":"Jensen","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"key":"R4-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198668010-00003","article-title":"Tibial condylar fractures: a twenty-year follow-up","volume":"68","author":"Lansinger","year":"1986","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R5-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.72B4.2380219","article-title":"Degenerative arthritis after intra-articular fractures of the knee. Long-term results","volume":"72","author":"Volpin","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"key":"R6-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198805000-00011","article-title":"Closed reduction of tibial plateau fractures. A comparison of functional and roentgenograhic end results","volume":"230","author":"Duwelius","year":"1988","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R7-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-199509040-00001","article-title":"Degenerative arthritis after tibial plateau fracture","volume":"9","author":"Honkonen","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"key":"R8-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-199209000-00012","article-title":"Indirect reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of displaced tibial plateau fractures","volume":"6","author":"Koval","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"key":"R9-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1541","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200209000-00006","article-title":"High-energy fractures of the tibial plateau. Knee function after longer follow-up","volume":"84","author":"Weigel","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R10-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1713","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200608000-00004","article-title":"Functional outcomes of severe bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with dual incisions and medial and lateral plates","volume":"88","author":"Barei","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R11-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198401000-00025","article-title":"Tibial plateau fractures: an analysis of the results of treatment in 60 patients","volume":"182","author":"Blokker","year":"1984","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R12-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1097\/00005373-198105000-00007","article-title":"Fractures of the tibial plateau: a review of ninety-five patients and comparison of treatment methods","volume":"21","author":"Waddell","year":"1981","journal-title":"J Trauma."},{"issue":"suppl 10","key":"R13-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-200711101-00001","article-title":"Fracture and dislocation classifications compendium \u2013 2007; Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification, Database and Outcomes Committee","volume":"21","author":"Marsh","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"key":"R14-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-200106000-00002","article-title":"The long-term functional outcome of operatively treated tibial plateau fractures","volume":"15","author":"Stevens","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"key":"R15-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1002\/1529-0131(200108)45:4<384::AID-ART352>3.0.CO;2-0","article-title":"Smallest detectable and minimally clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities","volume":"45","author":"Angst","year":"2001","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum."}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00005131-201703000-00007","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,28]],"date-time":"2023-08-28T02:16:54Z","timestamp":1693189014000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00005131-201703000-00007"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/bot.0000000000000762","relation":{},"ISSN":["0890-5339"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0890-5339","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]}}}