{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T23:37:51Z","timestamp":1787009871576,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To determine whether intramedullary nail (IMN) size and its relation to the canal diameter [nail-canal (NC) diameter] impacts the union rate or time to union in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Retrospective review.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Two Level 1 and 1 Level 2 trauma centers.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Two hundred eighty-seven patients met the criteria and were included in the study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Intervention:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients were treated with either an antegrade or retrograde IMN. Comparisons were first performed comparing 10- versus 11- versus 13-mm nails. Patients were then divided into 3 groups based on the difference between the size of the femoral canal at the isthmus and the IMN (NC diameter). Group 1: &lt;1.0 mm, group 2: &gt;1.0 and &lt;2.0 mm, and group 3: &gt;2.0 mm.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcome Measurements:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Nonunion rates, mean time to union.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Two hundred eighty-seven patients with a minimum of 12-month follow-up, who were treated with size with IMN for femoral shaft fractures, were assessed for fracture characteristics, time to union, and union rate. When comparing IMN size, no statistical difference was found when comparing time to union or overall union rate. When comparing NC diameter, no significant difference was found in union rate and time to union when comparing between the groups.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Similar rate of union and time to union were exhibited regardless of nail size or NC diameter. This can correlate to the standard utilization of a reamed, titanium 10-mm IMN with 5.0-mm interlocking screws in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, offering potentially less reaming, shorter operative times, and removing unnecessary stock from inventory.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/bot.0000000000001670","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,25]],"date-time":"2019-10-25T12:03:05Z","timestamp":1572004985000},"page":"180-185","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Impact of Surrounding Canal Size on Time to Union After Intramedullary Nailing of Femur Fractures: Are 10-mm Nails All We Need?"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Richard S.","family":"Yoon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, NJ;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Donald M.","family":"Adams","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, NJ;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel A.","family":"Seigerman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Philip K.","family":"Lim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Derek J.","family":"Donegan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frank A.","family":"Liporace","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, NJ;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1097\/00005373-200104000-00019","article-title":"Early weight-bearing after statically locked reamed intramedullary nailing of comminuted femoral fractures: is it a safe procedure?","volume":"50","author":"Arazi","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Trauma."},{"key":"R2-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199274010-00013","article-title":"Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part III: long-term effects of static interlocking fixation","volume":"74","author":"Brumback","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R3-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1538","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199911000-00005","article-title":"Immediate weight-bearing after treatment of a comminuted fracture of the femoral shaft with a statically locked intramedullary nail","volume":"81","author":"Brumback","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R4-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.80B3.0800485","article-title":"Reamed versus unreamed femoral nails: a randomised, prospective trial","volume":"80","author":"Clatworthy","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"key":"R5-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-200009000-00006","article-title":"Prospective comparison of retrograde and antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing","volume":"14","author":"Ostrum","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"key":"R6-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-200001000-00004","article-title":"Reamed versus nonreamed anterograde femoral nailing","volume":"14","author":"Tornetta","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"key":"R7-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1016\/S0030-5898(20)31463-2","article-title":"Comminuted fractures of the femoral shaft treated by intramedullary nailing","volume":"11","author":"Winquist","year":"1980","journal-title":"Orthop Clin North Am."},{"key":"R8-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198466040-00006","article-title":"Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases","volume":"66","author":"Winquist","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R9-20230828","first-page":"2093","article-title":"Nonunion following intramedullary nailing of the femur with and without reaming: results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial","volume":"85-A","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R10-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1097\/00005373-199903000-00007","article-title":"Reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: 551 cases","volume":"46","author":"Wolinsky","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Trauma."},{"key":"R11-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-1383(96)00146-5","article-title":"Reamed against unreamed nailing of the femoral diaphysis: a retrospective study of healing time","volume":"28","author":"Giannoudis","year":"1997","journal-title":"Injury."},{"key":"R12-20230828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-1383(00)00005-X","article-title":"Healing of closed femoral shaft fractures treated with the AO unreamed femoral nail: a comparative study with the AO reamed femoral nail","volume":"31","author":"Reynders","year":"2000","journal-title":"Injury."}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001670","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,28]],"date-time":"2023-08-28T03:30:20Z","timestamp":1693193420000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001670"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/bot.0000000000001670","relation":{},"ISSN":["0890-5339"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0890-5339","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]}}}