{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,5]],"date-time":"2026-11-05T04:40:56Z","timestamp":1793853656416,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To identify and analyze the current evidence for the use of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) constructs compared with conventional revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) for the management of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Data Sources:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases was conducted. Prospective and retrospective studies were eligible. No limitation was placed on publication date, with only articles printed in English eligible.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Study Selection:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Included studies were retrospective studies comparing ORIF and rTHA for the management of Vancouver B2 PFFs.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Data Extraction:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The primary outcome was the overall complication rate. Other outcomes included as rate of dislocation, revision operation, refracture, infection, nonunion, and subsidence\/loosening. Twenty-four studies were included totaling 1621 patients, of which 331 were treated with ORIF and 1280 with rTHA.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The 1621 patients included comprised a mixture of different fracture patterns, prostheses, and patient comorbidities. The overall complication rate for ORIF was 24% versus 18% for rTHA (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic> = 0.13). The results demonstrate that rTHA has a similar revision rate to ORIF in PFFs with a loose femoral component and adequate bone stock. ORIF was superior to rTHA in prevention of postoperative dislocation; however, there was no difference between other complications. This review suggests a potential role of both ORIF and rTHA in the management of Vancouver B2 PFFs.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/bot.0000000000002148","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,4]],"date-time":"2021-05-04T16:21:23Z","timestamp":1620145283000},"page":"7-16","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Management of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures, Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Daniel P.","family":"Lewis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Seth M.","family":"Tarrant","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia;"},{"name":"University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; and"},{"name":"Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (FRACS)."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lachlan","family":"Cornford","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia;"},{"name":"Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (FRACS)."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zsolt J.","family":"Balogh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia;"},{"name":"University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; and"},{"name":"Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (FRACS)."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R4-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S66","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0b013e31821b8c28","article-title":"Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections","volume":"25","author":"Della Rocca","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Orthop Truma."},{"key":"R5-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B4.37203","article-title":"Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience","volume":"98","author":"Abdel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"key":"R6-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.88B1.17029","article-title":"Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur","volume":"88","author":"Lindahl","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"key":"R7-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B4.37201","article-title":"Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience","volume":"98","author":"Abdel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"key":"R8-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B8.35170","article-title":"The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset","volume":"97","author":"Patel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"key":"R9-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/S0030-5898(05)70076-6","article-title":"Classification of the hip","volume":"30","author":"Brady","year":"1999","journal-title":"Orthop Clin North Am."},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"R10-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001063","article-title":"Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018","volume":"32","author":"Meinberg","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"key":"R11-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1447","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0480.R2","article-title":"Surgical treatment of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures: patient characteristics and outcomes of 1381 fractures treated in Sweden between 2001 and 2011","volume":"101-b","author":"Chatziagorou","year":"2019","journal-title":"Bone Jt J."},{"key":"R12-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.12884","article-title":"Is internal fixation alone advantageous in selected B2 periprosthetic fractures?","volume":"85","author":"Solomon","year":"2015","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg."},{"key":"R13-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000126","article-title":"Surgical fixation of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femur fractures: a systematic review","volume":"28","author":"Dehghan","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"key":"R14-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aott.2018.10.003","article-title":"Radiologic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for cementless stems in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures","volume":"53","author":"Park","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc."},{"key":"R15-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1430","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.03.003","article-title":"Vancouver B2 peri-prosthetic fractures in cemented femoral implants can be treated with open reduction and internal fixation alone without revision","volume":"34","author":"Smitham","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"key":"R16-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"key":"R17-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S290","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199608001-00026","article-title":"Development of hematopoietic cancers after implantation of total joint replacement","volume":"329","author":"Gillespie","year":"1996","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"R18-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1063","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198264070-00017","article-title":"Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation","volume":"64","author":"Harris","year":"1982","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"R19-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2016.01.036","article-title":"Locking compression plate versus revision-prosthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty","volume":"47","author":"Joestl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Injury."},{"key":"R20-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2015.07.010","article-title":"A principal component analysis is conducted for a case series quality appraisal checklist","volume":"69","author":"Guo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol."},{"key":"R21-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br Med J."},{"key":"R22-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1334318","DOI":"10.1080\/2331205X.2017.1334318","article-title":"Key statistical assumptions and methods in one-arm meta-analyses with binary endpoints and low event rates, including a real-life example in the area of endoscopic colonic stenting","volume":"4","author":"Rousseau","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cogent Med."},{"key":"R23-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2151459319876859","DOI":"10.1177\/2151459319876859","article-title":"Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures vancouver type B2: revision arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plate","volume":"10","author":"Baum","year":"2019","journal-title":"Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil."},{"key":"R24-20250614","first-page":"536","article-title":"Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty vancouver type B","volume":"56","author":"Bulatovic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Clin Croat."},{"key":"R25-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1007\/s11420-007-9045-4","article-title":"Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 99 patients","volume":"3","author":"Holley","year":"2007","journal-title":"HSS J Musculoskelet J Hosp Special Surg."},{"key":"R26-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1683","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-014-2570-0","article-title":"Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome","volume":"39","author":"Inngul","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Orthop."},{"key":"R27-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2015.01.015","article-title":"Treatment of type B periprosthetic femur fractures with curved non-locking plate with eccentric holes: retrospective study of 43 patients with minimum 1-year follow-up","volume":"101","author":"Lunebourg","year":"2015","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatology Surg Res."},{"key":"R28-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.4055\/cios.2014.6.2.138","article-title":"Treatment results of a periprosthetic femoral fracture case series: treatment method for Vancouver type b2 fractures can be customized","volume":"6","author":"Niikura","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Surg."},{"key":"R29-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.5301\/hip.2011.6301","article-title":"A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures-stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures","volume":"21","author":"Pavlou","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hip Int."},{"key":"R30-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1133","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-018-2181-3","article-title":"Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate","volume":"28","author":"Spina","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol."},{"key":"R31-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2010.01.102","article-title":"High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: an analysis of 71 cases","volume":"41","author":"Zuurmond","year":"2010","journal-title":"Injury."},{"key":"R32-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2014.07.013","article-title":"Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty","volume":"46","author":"Moreta","year":"2015","journal-title":"Injury."},{"key":"R33-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.02.062","article-title":"Reliability and validity of the vancouver classification in periprosthetic fractures around cementless femoral stems","volume":"34","author":"Lee","year":"2019","journal-title":"J arthroplasty."},{"key":"R34-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.11.021","article-title":"Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty","volume":"27","author":"Naqvi","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"key":"R35-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.03.050","article-title":"Results of cemented femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in the elderly","volume":"27","author":"Corten","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"key":"R36-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2014.11.006","article-title":"Mid-term results of 121 periprosthetic femoral fractures: increased failure and mortality within but not after one postoperative year","volume":"30","author":"Fuchtmeier","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"key":"R37-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(03)00148-7","article-title":"Distal fixation with Wagner revision stem in treating Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femur fractures in geriatric patients","volume":"18","author":"Ko","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"key":"R38-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.5301\/HIP.2012.9246","article-title":"Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures treated with the uncemented Wagner revision stem","volume":"22","author":"Marx","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hip Int."},{"key":"R39-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-009-0815-0","article-title":"Management of late periprosthetic femur fractures: a retrospective cohort of 72 patients","volume":"34","author":"Mukundan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Orthop."},{"key":"R40-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1617","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.87B12.16338","article-title":"The use of uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral components in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures","volume":"87","author":"O'Shea","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"key":"R41-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2012.09.015","article-title":"Periprosthetic fractures around hip hemiarthroplasty performed for hip fracture","volume":"44","author":"Phillips","year":"2013","journal-title":"Injury."},{"key":"R42-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"887","DOI":"10.1054\/arth.2002.34810","article-title":"An algorithm for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures","volume":"17","author":"Sledge","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"key":"R43-20250614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.2007.04087.x","article-title":"Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty","volume":"77","author":"Young","year":"2007","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg."}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000002148","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,14]],"date-time":"2025-06-14T19:02:15Z","timestamp":1749927735000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000002148"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/bot.0000000000002148","relation":{},"ISSN":["0890-5339"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0890-5339","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-04-27","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}