{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T06:27:42Z","timestamp":1792650462275,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,15]],"date-time":"2021-01-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1610668800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/ http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Study Design:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Prospective clinical study.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Summary of Background Data:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To the authors knowledge, there are no previous prospective studies to test the feasibility of the unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique in management of lumbar canal stenosis.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The study was conducted to compare clinical results of the UBE technique with the tubular microendoscopic (TME) surgery for management of degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>One hundred fifty-four cases of single level degenerative lumbar canal stenosis were randomly divided into 2 groups. Each group consisted of 77 cases: one group underwent UBE and the other TME. Clinical outcome was assessed periodically: early postoperative, at 1, 3, and every 6 months for 2 years. Clinical outcome assessment operatives included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), and patient satisfaction using Modified Macnab Criteria (MMC). In addition, the admission period, operative time, and estimated blood loss were compared.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>In UBE cases, ODI and ZCQ were statistically superior to TME for all periods (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>&lt;0.05). For both approaches, values presented progressive improvement until the 24th month. Regarding ODI, UBE and TME had an 84% and 79% success rate, respectively. In ZCQ, UBE and TME had a 79% and 73% success rate, respectively, at the end of the 24th month. Regarding the MMC, UBE and TME had 63% and 29% excellent results, respectively. UBE also has shorter admission period (days: 1.11 vs. 1.28), operative time (minutes: 57.74 vs. 65.31), and less estimated blood loss (mL: 49.47 vs. 53.57).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Given its demanding learning curve, UBE is considered an effective alternative to TME with a higher clinical success rate.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/bsd.0000000000001122","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,20]],"date-time":"2021-01-20T08:00:09Z","timestamp":1611129609000},"page":"E323-E328","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":80,"title":["Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Versus Tubular Microendoscopy in Management of Single Level Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Hayati","family":"Aygun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, Medicabil Hospital International, Nilufer\/Bursa, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Khaled","family":"Abdulshafi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Almostaqbal Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1373","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4523-3","article-title":"Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis","volume":"25","author":"He","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R2-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3171\/foc.2002.13.2.6","article-title":"Use of a tubular retractor system in microscopic lumbar discectomy: 1 year prospective results in 135 patients","volume":"13","author":"Palmer","year":"2002","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"R3-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E7","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.FOCUS17202","article-title":"Tubular microdiscectomy: techniques, complication avoidance, and review of the literature","volume":"43","author":"Clark","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"R4-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1262814","article-title":"Complications of endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery","volume":"53","author":"Sairyo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"key":"R5-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0000000000000628","article-title":"Unsuccessful percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a single-center experience of 10 228 cases","volume":"76","author":"Choi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"R6-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2015.09.047","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for young adults: a retrospective matched cohort study","volume":"86","author":"Ahn","year":"2016","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"R7-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.14245\/kjs.2012.9.3.215","article-title":"Comparative study of the outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microscopic lumbar discectomy using the tubular retractor system based on the VAS, ODI, and SF-36","volume":"9","author":"Yoon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Korean J Spine"},{"key":"R8-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198710000-00016","article-title":"Percutaneous posterolateral discectomy: anatomy and mechanism","volume":"223","author":"Kambin","year":"1987","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"R9-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.7.SPINE15304","article-title":"Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results","volume":"24","author":"Eum","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"suppl 2","key":"R11-20250621","first-page":"213","article-title":"Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system","volume":"97","author":"Palmer","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"R12-20250621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-018-0725-1","article-title":"Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis","volume":"13","author":"Kim","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"}],"container-title":["Clinical Spine Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001122","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,21]],"date-time":"2025-06-21T23:00:33Z","timestamp":1750546833000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001122"}},"subtitle":["A Prospective Study"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,15]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/bsd.0000000000001122","relation":{},"ISSN":["2380-0186"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2380-0186","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2020-05-13","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2020-11-07","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}