{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T00:25:19Z","timestamp":1748737519987},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"7","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Study Design:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiologic data of a prospective cohort study.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To research the clinical differences after lumbar total disk replacement (TDR) with respect to the preoperative global and the adaptation at the local sagittal profile (SP) of the spine.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Summary of Background Data:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>It was suggested that facet loads and degeneration are dependent on epidemiologically defined types of SP. Moreover, the success of TDR was related to segmental facet joint loads. The influences of the preoperative SP or of the changes of the local SP after TDR on the clinical outcome after TDR remain unclear.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Fifty-two patients included in a prospective cohort study regarding lumbar single-level TDR L4\/5 (n=22) or L5\/S1 (n=30) because of degenerative disk disease (Modic \u22642 degrees) were clinically (visual analog scale for back, leg, and overall pain; Oswestry Disability Index) and radiologically (extension-flexion radiographs, plain-spine, and whole-spine lateral radiographs in upright standing position) reevaluated after a minimum follow-up of 24 (24\u201369) months. On the basis of preoperative plain radiographs in upright standing position, patients were retrospectively assigned to 4 groups according to the individual sagittal profile type (SPT). In patients with persistent back pain, a facet infiltration at the index level was performed.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>For all patients, an SPT could be defined. Global SP did not change compared with the preoperative state. All groups improved clinically over follow-up. At the last follow-up, types 1 and 4 demonstrated significantly inferior scores for pain and function. TDR-induced changes at the superior adjacent segment and the posterior disk height at the index level were also correlated to inferior clinical results. Infiltration test was positive in type 1\u20134: 67%, 40%, 33%, and 75%, respectively, of the symptomatic patients.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>We suggest SPTs 1 and 4 to represent a contraindication for lumbar TDR of levels L4\/5 or L5\/S1. Local adaptation in the adjacent segment to TDR may influence the clinical outcome as well.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/bsd.0b013e31827f434e","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,4]],"date-time":"2012-12-04T19:13:32Z","timestamp":1354648412000},"page":"291-299","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Influence of the Type of Sagittal Profile on Clinical Results of Lumbar Total Disk Replacement After a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Patrick","family":"Strube","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eike K.","family":"Hoff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carsten F.","family":"Perka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christian","family":"Gross","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Putzier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2679","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000146457.83240.eb","article-title":"Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences","volume":"29","author":"Battie","year":"2004","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"suppl 5","key":"R2-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1928-x","article-title":"Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology","volume":"20","author":"Roussouly","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R3-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65","article-title":"Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position","volume":"30","author":"Roussouly","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R4-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000170587.32676.0e","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes","volume":"30","author":"Blumenthal","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R5-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.I.00680","article-title":"Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months","volume":"93","author":"Delamarter","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"R6-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200308000-00005","article-title":"The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion","volume":"16","author":"Gillet","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"R7-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1600","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318217668f","article-title":"Lumbar disc arthroplasty with MAVERICK disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial","volume":"36","author":"Gornet","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R8-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.08.007","article-title":"Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up","volume":"9","author":"Guyer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"R9-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1192","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318170fd35","article-title":"Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a pr9ospective cohort study over five-year follow-up","volume":"33","author":"Ha","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R10-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1007\/s005860000239","article-title":"Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion","volume":"10","author":"Kumar","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R11-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1576","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000170561.25636.1c","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes","volume":"30","author":"McAfee","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R12-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1938","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03","article-title":"Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature","volume":"29","author":"Park","year":"2004","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R13-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318054e377","article-title":"Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease","volume":"32","author":"Zigler","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R14-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000257554.67505.45","article-title":"Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients","volume":"32","author":"David","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R15-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000172361.07479.6b","article-title":"Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up","volume":"18","author":"Lemaire","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"R16-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.C.01345","article-title":"Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up","volume":"87","author":"Tropiano","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"R17-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2006.08.009","article-title":"Epidemiology of indications and contraindications to total disc replacement in an academic practice","volume":"7","author":"Chin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"R18-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2538","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000144829.57885.20","article-title":"The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients","volume":"29","author":"Huang","year":"2004","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R19-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177S","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.003","article-title":"The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement","volume":"4","author":"McAfee","year":"2004","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"R20-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2006.04.012","article-title":"Incidence of contraindications to total disc arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive fusion patients with a specific analysis of facet arthrosis","volume":"7","author":"Wong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"R21-20230831","first-page":"219","article-title":"Influence of facet and posterior muscle degeneration on clinical results of lumbar total disc replacement: two-year follow-up","volume":"18","author":"Le Huec","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"R22-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0519-3","article-title":"Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations","volume":"17","author":"Siepe","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R23-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1991","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d6f878","article-title":"The fate of facet joint and adjacent level disc degeneration following total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, x-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging investigation","volume":"35","author":"Siepe","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R24-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-006-0208-7","article-title":"Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement","volume":"16","author":"Tournier","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"suppl 5","key":"R25-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1933-0","article-title":"Sagittal balance parameters influence indications for lumbar disc arthroplasty or ALIF","volume":"20","author":"Pellet","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R26-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbspin.2011.05.028","article-title":"Artificial disks: modest medium- and long-term benefits and a need for better patient selection","volume":"78","author":"Le Huec","year":"2011","journal-title":"Joint, Bone, Spine: Revue Du Rhumatisme"},{"key":"R27-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199704000-00009","article-title":"Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000","volume":"337","author":"Lemaire","year":"1997","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"R28-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1873","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200109010-00011","article-title":"Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration","volume":"26","author":"Pfirrmann","year":"2001","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R29-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.166.1.3336678","article-title":"Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging","volume":"166","author":"Modic","year":"1988","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R30-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s00482-002-0164-z","article-title":"Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic pain","volume":"16","author":"Gerbershagen","year":"2002","journal-title":"Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)"},{"key":"R31-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2224","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd4","article-title":"Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery","volume":"35","author":"Schwab","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R32-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-002-0464-0","article-title":"The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain","volume":"12","author":"Hagg","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R33-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-004-0815-0","article-title":"Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity","volume":"15","author":"Mannion","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R34-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2444","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318182c37b","article-title":"Posterior component impingement after lumbar total disc replacement: a radiographic analysis of 66 ProDisc-L prostheses in 56 patients","volume":"33","author":"Kafer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R35-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1459","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-006-0294-6","article-title":"Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases","volume":"16","author":"Barrey","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R36-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000138279.53439.cc","article-title":"Spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, and spinopelvic balance: a correlation study","volume":"29","author":"Labelle","year":"2004","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R37-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1170","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-008-0713-y","article-title":"Spino-pelvic alignment after surgical correction for developmental spondylolisthesis","volume":"17","author":"Labelle","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R38-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31819b213c","article-title":"Index level mobility after total lumbar disc replacement: is it beneficial or detrimental","volume":"34","author":"Cakir","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R39-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"904","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31819966b0","article-title":"Interdependence between disc space height, range of motion and clinical outcome in total lumbar disc replacement","volume":"34","author":"Siepe","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R40-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S110","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000092209.27573.90","article-title":"Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model","volume":"28","author":"Cunningham","year":"2003","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R41-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1033","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198809000-00011","article-title":"Instantaneous axes of rotation of the lumbar intervertebral joints","volume":"13","author":"Pearcy","year":"1988","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R42-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1515\/bmte.2000.45.9.228","article-title":"[Precision and comparison of CT-, MRI- and DL-controlled interventions exemplified by lumbar facet infiltration--an experimental study]","volume":"45","author":"Jerosch","year":"2000","journal-title":"Biomed Tech (Berl)"},{"issue":"suppl 5","key":"R43-20230831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1924-1","article-title":"Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach","volume":"20","author":"Roussouly","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"}],"container-title":["Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/01933606-201608000-00006","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,31]],"date-time":"2023-08-31T18:22:23Z","timestamp":1693506143000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/01933606-201608000-00006"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/bsd.0b013e31827f434e","relation":{},"ISSN":["2380-0186"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2380-0186","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]}}}