{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,12]],"date-time":"2026-06-12T00:08:52Z","timestamp":1781222932803,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Dimens Crit Care Nurs"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Despite early revascularization and supportive medical therapies, acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMICS) remains the leading cause of death in patient's with myocardial infarction. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has been the device of choice for these patients but has failed to show mortality benefit over medical therapy alone. The Impella (AbioMed, Danvers, Massachusetts) is a more recently developed alternative in bridging patients to recovery.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The aim of this study was to evaluate available evidence comparing mortality with the use of Impella (2.0 or CP) versus IABP in patients with AMICS.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched to find articles comparing the outcomes of IABP versus Impella in AMICS patients. A total of 7 articles met the inclusion criteria.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Thirty-day mortality was the primary outcome observed. Secondary outcomes included myocardial recovery and complications from device implantation. All studies support that there is no statistically significant reduction in mortality when utilizing the Impella over the IABP.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Further research in an adequately powered randomized clinical trial is needed to shed light on the clinical characteristics of patients after AMICS who would benefit from 1 type of mechanical circulatory support over another. The therapy chosen is determined by provider discretion and skill set, as well as device availability. It is important for all care team members, including the critical care nurse, to understand the implications and complications associated with each therapy, so care can be catered to the individual patient's needs.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/dcc.0000000000000548","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,29]],"date-time":"2022-09-29T16:04:34Z","timestamp":1664467474000},"page":"321-329","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Versus Impella in Managing Cardiogenic Shock After Myocardial Infarction"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Rachel E.","family":"Reist","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kathleen A.","family":"Seidt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"bib1-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-019-2368-y","article-title":"Mechanical circulatory support devices for cardiogenic shock: state of the art","volume":"23","year":"2019","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"issue":"2","key":"bib2-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1007\/s11936-020-0804-6","article-title":"Mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock","volume":"22","year":"2020","journal-title":"Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"bib3-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e000987","DOI":"10.1136\/openhrt-2018-000987","article-title":"Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock","volume":"6","year":"2019","journal-title":"Open Heart"},{"issue":"8","key":"bib4-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e011991","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.119.011991","article-title":"Cardiogenic shock","volume":"8","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Heart Assoc"},{"issue":"47","key":"bib5-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3523","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehx363","article-title":"Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"38","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"issue":"6","key":"bib6-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1111\/joic.12569","article-title":"The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock","volume":"31","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Interv Cardiol"},{"issue":"10","key":"bib7-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1249","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614","article-title":"Impella support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock","volume":"139","year":"2019","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"issue":"11","key":"bib8-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1249","DOI":"10.1007\/s00392-019-01458-2","article-title":"Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data","volume":"108","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Res Cardiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"bib9-20250801","first-page":"1082","article-title":"2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation","volume":"70","year":"2017","journal-title":"Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)"},{"issue":"4","key":"bib10-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2012.11.019","article-title":"2013 ACCF\/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction","volume":"61","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"bib11-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carrev.2021.01.028","article-title":"Impella support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A meta-analysis","volume":"34","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Revasc Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"bib12-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2016.10.022","article-title":"Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction","volume":"69","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"8","key":"bib13-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2020.0254","article-title":"Association of use of an intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist device vs intra-aortic balloon pump with in-hospital mortality and major bleeding among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock","volume":"323","year":"2020","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"2","key":"bib14-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2015.03.040","article-title":"Incidence and prognosis of vascular complications after percutaneous placement of left ventricular assist device","volume":"62","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"bib15-20250801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(54)90171-3","article-title":"Surgical therapy for the occluded artery","volume":"87","year":"1954","journal-title":"Am J Surg"}],"container-title":["Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/DCC.0000000000000548","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T15:02:21Z","timestamp":1754060541000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/DCC.0000000000000548"}},"subtitle":["Literature Review"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/dcc.0000000000000548","relation":{},"ISSN":["1538-8646","0730-4625"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1538-8646","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0730-4625","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]}}}