{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T13:24:28Z","timestamp":1788614668989,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Dermatitis\u00ae"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Surfactants are common ingredients in topical products, which can cause both irritant and allergic contact dermatitis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of 12 common groups of surfactants and 12 common individual surfactants among products in each category in the American Contact Dermatitis Society Contact Allergen Management Program (CAMP).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The American Contact Dermatitis Society CAMP was queried for the 12 surfactant groups and the 12 individual surfactants.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The laureth\/pareth sulfate group was the most prevalent surfactant group in CAMP products (17.9%). Laureth\/pareth sulfates were the most common surfactant group in all product categories, except household and eye care products. The betaine\/sultaine group (13.5%) and glucosides (10.0%) were also found in a significant proportion of CAMP products. Oleamidopropyl dimethylamine has the highest positive reaction rate (3.5%) but was tied for the lowest prevalence (0.20%) of the 12 individual surfactants studied. In contrast, cocamidopropyl betaine has a lower positive reaction rate (1.6%) with a higher prevalence (10.4%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Surfactants were commonly found across all product types in CAMP. This study provides important information on allergen and irritant exposures in care products.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/der.0000000000000511","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,22]],"date-time":"2019-08-22T22:48:51Z","timestamp":1566514131000},"page":"358-362","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Prevalence of Surfactant in the Contact Allergen Management Program"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Annika P.","family":"Weinhammer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"From the Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrew","family":"Scheman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"From the Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Margo J.","family":"Reeder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"From the Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_1_2_2","volume-title":"Encyclopedia of Surfactants","author":"Ash M","year":"1985","unstructured":"Ash M. Encyclopedia of Surfactants. Vol 1. Palm Springs, CA: Chemical Publishing; 1985."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0000000000000141"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archderm.1973.01620270027006"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_3_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02598.x","article-title":"Vulvar dermatitis and fissures\u2014irritant dermatitis from methyl benzethonium chloride","volume":"13","author":"Maibach HI","year":"1985","unstructured":"Maibach HI, , Mathias CT. Vulvar dermatitis and fissures\u2014irritant dermatitis from methyl benzethonium chloride. Contact Dermatitis, 1985; 13(5):340.","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0000000000000240"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0000000000000316"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1067\/mjd.2003.489","article-title":"The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens","volume":"49","author":"Saripalli YV","year":"2003","unstructured":"Saripalli YV, , Achen F, , Belsito DV. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2003; 49:65\u201369.","journal-title":"J Am Acad Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2310\/6620.2008.06043"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_10_2","first-page":"223","article-title":"Cocamidopropyl betaine allergy","volume":"12","author":"Mowad CM","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mowad CM. Cocamidopropyl betaine allergy. Am J Contact Dermat, 2001; 12:223\u2013224.","journal-title":"Am J Contact Dermat"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02078.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1997.tb02464.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2310\/6620.2004.11744"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0000000000000417"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02372.x"},{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_3_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06094.x","article-title":"Sensitization to cocamidopropylbetaine: an 8-year review","volume":"40","author":"Armstrong DK","year":"1999","unstructured":"Armstrong DK, , Smith HR, , Ross JS, et al. Sensitization to cocamidopropylbetaine: an 8-year review. Contact Dermatitis, 1999; 40(6):335\u2013336.","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2310\/6620.2004.20417"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0000000000000097","article-title":"North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results","volume":"26","author":"Warshaw EM","year":"2015","unstructured":"Warshaw EM, , Maibach HI, , Taylor JS, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results. Dermatitis, 2015; 26(1):49\u201359.","journal-title":"Dermatitis"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2006.00927.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1987.tb02640.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00522.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0000000000000225"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_3_1_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0000000000000290","article-title":"Alkyl glucosides","volume":"28","author":"Sasseville D","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sasseville D. Alkyl glucosides. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(4):296.","journal-title":"Dermatitis"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/cod.12159"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0000000000000259"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0b013e318260d78d"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_3_1_27_2","first-page":"243","article-title":"Skin sensitizing properties of the ethanolamines mono-, di-, and triethanolamine","volume":"60","author":"Lessmann H","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lessmann H, , Uter W, , Schnuch A, et al. Skin sensitizing properties of the ethanolamines mono-, di-, and triethanolamine. Data analysis of a multicentre surveillance network (IVDK) and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 60(5):243\u2013255.","journal-title":"Data analysis of a multicentre surveillance network (IVDK) and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis"}],"container-title":["Dermatitis\u00ae"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/DER.0000000000000511","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1097\/DER.0000000000000511","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/DER.0000000000000511","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T18:05:00Z","timestamp":1777399500000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full\/10.1097\/DER.0000000000000511"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1097\/DER.0000000000000511"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/der.0000000000000511","relation":{},"ISSN":["1710-3568","2162-5220"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1710-3568","type":"print"},{"value":"2162-5220","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]]}}}