{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T13:17:02Z","timestamp":1777555022165,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,1]],"date-time":"2013-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1380585600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Dermatitis\u00ae"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Patch test readings are usually performed on day 2 (48 hours) and day 4 (96 hours). However, reports in the literature identify delayed allergy to metals, corticosteroids, antibiotics, some preservatives, acrylic and methacrylic monomers and\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      -phenylenediamine.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of our study was to identify the benefit of performing a day 7 (168 hours) reading to identify relevant late positive reactions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients\/Methods\/Materials<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Two hundred three consecutive patients were patch tested to the British Society for Cutaneous Allergy standard series with additional test series selected according to clinical history and applied at the same time.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Twenty-six patients (12.8%) had new positive reactions on day 7 (168 hours), with 28 relevant positive reactions to 21 allergens. These included mercury 0.5% (2\/26); cobalt chloride 1% (2\/26); colophony 20% (2\/26); disperse blue mix 106\/124 1% (2\/26); preservatives (4\/26) that included Methylchloroisothiazolinone\/methylisothiazolinone, sodium metabisulfite, and diazolidinyl urea; fragrances (7\/26); and gentamycin sulfate 20% (1\/26).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>These results confirm findings in the literature and support the argument for performing a day 7 reading (168 hours) to identify relevant late positive reactions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/der.0b013e31829cb0d1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,16]],"date-time":"2014-04-16T12:02:44Z","timestamp":1397649764000},"page":"237-240","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["The Relevance of 7-Day Patch Test Reading"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Eleanor","family":"Higgins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"From the Department of Dermatology, St Vincent\u2019s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Collins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"From the Department of Dermatology, St Vincent\u2019s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781444317633.ch26"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_3_2","first-page":"16","volume-title":"Fisher\u2019s Contact Dermatitis","author":"Rietschel R","year":"2008","unstructured":"Rietschel R, , Fowler F, , Fisher A. Practical aspects of patch testing.16\u201318. In: Rietschel R, , Fowler F, , Fisher A, eds. Fisher\u2019s Contact Dermatitis. 6th ed. Hamilton, Ont.; Maidenhead: BC Decker; McGraw-Hill Education; 2008: 16\u201318.","edition":"6"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2133.2009.09106.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaad.2008.04.022"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1989.tb03121.x"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_3_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1978.tb03760.x","article-title":"Day 7 (D7) patch test reading\u2014valuable or not?","volume":"4","author":"Mitchell JC.","year":"1978","unstructured":"Mitchell JC. Day 7 (D7) patch test reading\u2014valuable or not?. Contact Dermatitis, 1978; 4(3): 139\u2013141.","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_3_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2133.2006.07159.x","article-title":"Late reactions to the patch-test prepartions para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group","volume":"154","author":"Hillen U","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hillen U, , Jappe U, , Frosch PJ, et al. Late reactions to the patch-test prepartions para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Br J Dermatol, 2006; 154(4): 665\u2013670.","journal-title":"Br J Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0536.2000.042006330.x"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_3_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06008.x","article-title":"Patch test reactions at D4, D5 and D6","volume":"40","author":"Geier J","year":"1999","unstructured":"Geier J, , Gefeller O, , Wiechmann K, et al. Patch test reactions at D4, D5 and D6. Contact Dermatitis, 1999; 40(3): 119\u2013126.","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_3_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0105-1873.2005.00705.x","article-title":"The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate","volume":"53","author":"Isaksson M","year":"2005","unstructured":"Isaksson M, , Lindberg M, , Sundberg K, et al. The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 53(5): 292\u2013297.","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_3_1_12_2","first-page":"154","article-title":"Late patch-test reactions to budesonide need not be a sign of sensitization induced by the test procedure","volume":"14","author":"Isaksson M","year":"2003","unstructured":"Isaksson M, , Bruze M. Late patch-test reactions to budesonide need not be a sign of sensitization induced by the test procedure. Am J Contact Dermat, 2003; 14(3): 154\u2013156.","journal-title":"Am J Contact Dermat"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_3_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1396-0296.2004.04036.x","article-title":"Corticosteroids","volume":"17","author":"Isaksson M.","year":"2004","unstructured":"Isaksson M. Corticosteroids. Dermatol Ther, 2004; 17(4): 314\u2013320.","journal-title":"Dermatol Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0536.2000.042001027.x","article-title":"Patch testing with corticosteroid mixes in Europe","volume":"42","author":"Isaksson M","year":"2000","unstructured":"Isaksson M, , Andersen KE, , Brandao FM, et al. Patch testing with corticosteroid mixes in Europe. A multicentre study of the EECDRG. Contact Dermatitis, 2000; 42(1): 27\u201335.","journal-title":"A multicentre study of the EECDRG. Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2310\/derm.1.2005.2103"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1470.2010.01297.x","article-title":"The importance of checking for delayed reactions in pediatric patch testing","volume":"28","author":"Matiz C","year":"2011","unstructured":"Matiz C, , Russell K, , Jacob SE. The importance of checking for delayed reactions in pediatric patch testing. Pediatr Dermatol, 2011; 28(1): 12\u201314.","journal-title":"Pediatr Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archderm.144.10.1329"}],"container-title":["Dermatitis\u00ae"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/DER.0b013e31829cb0d1","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1097\/DER.0b013e31829cb0d1","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/DER.0b013e31829cb0d1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T18:08:09Z","timestamp":1777399689000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full\/10.1097\/DER.0b013e31829cb0d1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,1]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1097\/DER.0b013e31829cb0d1"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/der.0b013e31829cb0d1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1710-3568","2162-5220"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1710-3568","type":"print"},{"value":"2162-5220","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,1]]}}}