{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T09:44:55Z","timestamp":1773308695710,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/gco.0000000000000079","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,6,20]],"date-time":"2014-06-20T13:21:30Z","timestamp":1403270490000},"page":"281-289","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["A review on the role of laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Maurizio","family":"Rosati","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Silvia","family":"Bramante","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fiorella","family":"Conti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.004","article-title":"New procedures for uterine prolapse.","volume":"27","author":"Khunda","year":"2013","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R2-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.4293\/108680813X13654754535115","article-title":"Efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse.","volume":"17","author":"Rosati","year":"2013","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"R3-10-20210129","first-page":"679","article-title":"True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen year experience.","volume":"44","author":"Marchionni","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"R4-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s001920070033","article-title":"Post hysterectomy vault prolapse.","volume":"11","author":"Barrington","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"R5-10-20210129","first-page":"CD004014","article-title":"Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.","volume":"4","author":"Maher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R7-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00459.x","article-title":"Abdominal sacral colpopexy: an independent prospective long- term follow-up study.","volume":"45","author":"Higgs","year":"2005","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R8-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2007.06.017","article-title":"Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138 patients.","volume":"14","author":"Rivoire","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"R9-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1415","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0657-0","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome - a prospective study with 101 cases.","volume":"19","author":"Sarlos","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"R10-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1097\/01.gco.0000175355.48802.7b","article-title":"The use of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of pelvic organ prolapse.","volume":"17","author":"Gadonneix","year":"2005","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.01.022","article-title":"Mid-term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior polyester mesh for treatment of genito-urinary prolapse.","volume":"156","author":"Sergent","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"R12-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1815","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2172-1","article-title":"Apical prolapse.","volume":"24","author":"Barber","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R13-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1885-x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study.","volume":"24","author":"Freeman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R14-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e32832fd255","article-title":"The effectiveness and complications of graft materials used in vaginal prolapse surgery.","volume":"21","author":"Foon","year":"2009","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R15-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07","article-title":"Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.","volume":"104","author":"Nygaard","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R17-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.09.001","article-title":"Prevention of complications related to the use of prosthetic meshes in prolapse surgery: guidelines for clinical practice.","volume":"165","author":"Deffieux","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"R18-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318299a66c","article-title":"Robotic versus vaginal urogynecologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study of perioperative complications in elderly women.","volume":"19","author":"Robinson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R19-10-20210129","first-page":"232","article-title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic colposacropexy and cervicosacropexy with the da Vinci surgical system.","volume":"20","author":"Matthews","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surg Technol Int"},{"key":"R20-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-2016-4","article-title":"Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for stage III pelvic organ prolapse.","volume":"24","author":"Louis-Sylvestre","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R21-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.4293\/108680812X13462882736132","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacropexy: a retrospective analysis of perioperative complications and anatomical outcomes.","volume":"16","author":"Bojahr","year":"2012","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"R22-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1097\/SMJ.0b013e318254d0c6","article-title":"Prospective evaluation of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy and sacrocervicopexy for the management of apical pelvic support defects.","volume":"105","author":"Matthews","year":"2012","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"key":"R23-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000047","article-title":"Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.","volume":"20","author":"Barboglio","year":"2014","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R24-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2209-5","article-title":"Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 1- to 4-year follow-up of women postoperatively.","volume":"25","author":"Rahmanou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R25-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.07.025","article-title":"Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.","volume":"165","author":"Mourik","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"R26-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0171","article-title":"Uterine sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse: safety and feasibility.","volume":"27","author":"Lee","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"R27-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","article-title":"Uterine-preserving POP surgery.","volume":"24","author":"Gutman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R28-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318246806d","article-title":"Mesh erosion in robotic sacrocolpopexy.","volume":"18","author":"Osmundsen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R29-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1878-9","article-title":"Unusual site of graft erosion after abdominal sacrocervicopexy.","volume":"24","author":"Nardello","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R30-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318292eb6d","article-title":"Mesh extrusion through the internal cervical os: an unusual complication following laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy.","volume":"19","author":"Moulder","year":"2013","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R31-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31829ff5b8","article-title":"Unanticipated uterine pathologic finding after morcellation during robotic-assisted supracervical hysterectomy and cervicosacropexy for uterine prolapse.","volume":"20","author":"Hill","year":"2014","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R33-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e328354ca7d","article-title":"Review of extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy as a technique for advanced uterine and vault prolapse.","volume":"24","author":"Onol","year":"2012","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R34-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000006","article-title":"Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.","volume":"123","author":"Anger","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R36-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1845-5","article-title":"Mesh erosion following abdominal sacral colpopexy in the absence and presence of the cervical stump.","volume":"24","author":"Ginath","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R37-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.06.009","article-title":"Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and sacrocervicopexy: initial experience with a novel surgical approach to uterovaginal prolapse.","volume":"19","author":"Rosenblatt","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"R38-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.02.019","article-title":"Microlaparoscopy in urogynecology: LSH and sacrocervicopexy.","volume":"20","author":"Rosenblatt","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"R40-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-008-0460-4","article-title":"Successful pregnancy outcome following laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for second degree uterine prolapse.","volume":"7","author":"Busby","year":"2010","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"R41-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1631-9","article-title":"Sacrohysteropexy followed by successful pregnancy and eventual reoperation for prolapse.","volume":"23","author":"Lewis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R42-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1038\/nrurol.2010.164","article-title":"Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.","volume":"7","author":"Zucchi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Nat Rev Urol"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000079","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,14]],"date-time":"2021-05-14T00:42:01Z","timestamp":1620952921000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00001703-201408000-00010"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/gco.0000000000000079","relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-872X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-872X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]}}}