{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T15:04:31Z","timestamp":1789571071950,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose of review<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse, including concurrent rectal and vaginal prolapse, is increasingly recognized in aging populations. This review summarizes recent advances in diagnostic imaging, multidisciplinary evaluation, and surgical techniques for combined repair.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Recent findings<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Multicompartment prolapse is increasingly prevalent and often underrecognized without coordinated evaluation. Dynamic defecography, particularly upright or MRI-based, improves detection of multicompartment descent. Minimally invasive combined sacrocolpopexy (SCP) and ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is increasingly used with favorable outcomes. Surgical series report low complication rates and suggest a potential reduction in prolapse recurrence with combined repair. Robotic platforms, including newer systems, enhance precision, and visualization. Emerging techniques include laparoscopic resection rectopexy with SCP and selective use of biologic mesh. Multidisciplinary care improves coordination and recurrence prevention.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Summary<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Contemporary management of multicompartment prolapse requires a collaborative, patient-centered approach. Advances in imaging and minimally invasive surgery, particularly robotic SCP and VMR, have improved outcomes. Future research should focus on standardizing techniques, optimizing mesh configurations, and long-term functional results.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/gco.0000000000001069","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,17]],"date-time":"2025-09-17T13:00:41Z","timestamp":1758114041000},"page":"416-420","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Multicompartment pelvic floor prolapse: advances in diagnosis and surgical management"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"Shannon L.","family":"Wallace","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Disorders, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amy D.","family":"Gee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Disorders, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deepanjana","family":"Das","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Disorders, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e70114","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.70114","article-title":"The influence of sacrocolporectopexy on pelvic anatomy assessed in an upright position using MRI.","volume":"27","author":"Kortman","year":"2025","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"R2-20251030","first-page":"e51378","article-title":"Comparison of dynamic magnetic resonance defecography with clinical examination in diagnosing pelvic floor dysfunction: an observational study.","volume":"15","author":"Wadhwani","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"R3-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1133","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02049817","article-title":"Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients.","volume":"37","author":"Mellgren","year":"1994","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"R4-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000719","article-title":"Does rectocele on defecography equate to rectocele on physical examination in patients with defecatory symptoms?","volume":"27","author":"Wallace","year":"2021","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R5-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1106","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1463-1318.2011.02904.x","article-title":"Altemeier\u2019s procedure for rectal prolapse: analysis of long-term outcome in 60 patients.","volume":"14","author":"Ris","year":"2012","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"R6-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12027","article-title":"Incontinence in full-thickness rectal prolapse: low level of improvement after laparoscopic rectopexy.","volume":"15","author":"Cunin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"R7-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1007\/DCR.0b013e3181ca74b4","article-title":"Sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence following repair of rectal prolapse.","volume":"53","author":"Robert-Yap","year":"2010","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"R8-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.030","article-title":"Recurrent pelvic prolapse after pelvic organ prolapse suspension (POPS): Analysis and treatment of an emerging clinical issue.","volume":"302","author":"Campagna","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"R9-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000003013","article-title":"Combined robotic ventral mesh rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy for multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse.","volume":"67","author":"Devane","year":"2024","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"R10-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1955","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-05869-2","article-title":"The current evidence and how-to on combined sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy.","volume":"35","author":"Gee","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R11-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.05.050","article-title":"Postoperative complications and pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following combined pelvic organ prolapse and rectal prolapse surgery compared with pelvic organ prolapse only surgery.","volume":"227","author":"Wallace","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R12-20251030","first-page":"302","article-title":"Approaching combined rectal and vaginal prolapse.","volume":"34","author":"Wallace","year":"2022","journal-title":"Clin Colon Rectal Surg"},{"key":"R13-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e16","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000002192","article-title":"Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy.","volume":"65","author":"Brady","year":"2022","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"R14-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05701-3","article-title":"Determinants of dissatisfaction after laparoscopic cure of vaginal and\/or rectal prolapse using mesh: a comprehensive retrospective cohort study.","volume":"35","author":"Arab","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R15-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-020-02199-5","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse.","volume":"24","author":"Campagna","year":"2020","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"R16-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-024-02474-4","article-title":"Early safety and efficiency outcomes of a novel interdisciplinary laparoscopic resection rectopexy combined with sacrocolpopexy for women with obstructive defecation syndrome and pelvic organ prolapse: a single center study.","volume":"24","author":"Rudroff","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"key":"R17-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.52054\/FVVO.16.2.017","article-title":"Laparoscopic resection rectopexy (RRP) combined with mesh sacrocolpopexy (SCP) for obstructed defecation syndrome with pelvic organ prolapse in an interdisciplinary approach.","volume":"16","author":"Rudroff","year":"2024","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis Obgyn"},{"key":"R18-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-023-02768-4","article-title":"Robotic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse using the new Hugo RAS system.","volume":"27","author":"Campagna","year":"2023","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"R19-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-018-3140-5","article-title":"Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse.","volume":"33","author":"Geltzeiler","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"R20-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3699-y","article-title":"Safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent rectopexy: peri-operative morbidity in a nationwide cohort.","volume":"30","author":"Weinberg","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R21-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001412","article-title":"Patient outcomes after robotic ventral rectopexy with sacrocolpopexy.","volume":"30","author":"Ross","year":"2024","journal-title":"Urogynecology (Phila)"},{"key":"R22-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1001","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-05748-w","article-title":"Healthcare resource utilization following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: impact of concomitant rectopexy.","volume":"35","author":"Lua-Mailland","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R23-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-06016-7","article-title":"The learning curve in urogynecology and functional urology: a systematic review.","volume":"36","author":"Salehi-Pourmehr","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R24-20251030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e220137","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.220137","article-title":"Complications of mesh sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy: imaging review.","volume":"43","author":"Haouari","year":"2023","journal-title":"Radiographics"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/GCO.0000000000001069","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T05:02:37Z","timestamp":1761800557000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/GCO.0000000000001069"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/gco.0000000000001069","relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-872X","1473-656X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-872X","type":"print"},{"value":"1473-656X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]]}}}