{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:09:33Z","timestamp":1786118973707,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/gco.0b013e328314b6f8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,6]],"date-time":"2008-10-06T03:09:23Z","timestamp":1223262563000},"page":"519-527","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Prolonged pregnancy: when should we intervene?"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Leo","family":"Doherty","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Errol R","family":"Norwitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-3-20210129","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2005","volume":"56","author":"Martin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"R2-3-20210129","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 1998","volume":"48","author":"Ventura","year":"2000","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"R3-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1660","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127601","article-title":"Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination","volume":"187","author":"Savitz","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R4-3-20210129","first-page":"CD000182","article-title":"Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.","volume":"2","author":"Neilson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R5-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200409000-00052","article-title":"Management of Postterm Pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 55.","volume":"104","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R6-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.326.7387.476","article-title":"Risk of recurrence of prolonged pregnancy","volume":"326","author":"Olesen","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R7-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.126645","article-title":"Male gender predisposes to prolongation of pregnancy","volume":"187","author":"Divon","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R8-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.05.048","article-title":"Prepregnancy body mass index and the length of gestation at term","volume":"197","author":"Stotland","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R9-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00486-3","article-title":"Low pregravid body mass index as a risk factor for preterm birth: variation by ethnic group","volume":"89","author":"Hickey","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R10-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/28.2.253","article-title":"Recurrence of prolonged pregnancy","volume":"28","author":"Mogren","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"R11-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.10.873","article-title":"Risk for postterm delivery after previous postterm delivery","volume":"196","author":"Kistka","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R12-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.036","article-title":"Genetic influence on prolonged gestation: a population-based Danish twin study","volume":"190","author":"Laursen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R13-3-20210129","first-page":"1192","article-title":"Risk of unexplained stillbirth at different gestational ages","volume":"1","author":"Yudkin","year":"1987","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R14-3-20210129","first-page":"779","article-title":"Postterm induction of labor revisited","volume":"96","author":"Rand","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R15-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109735","article-title":"Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies","volume":"184","author":"Smith","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R16-3-20210129","first-page":"547","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth","volume":"79","author":"Feldman","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R17-3-20210129","first-page":"685","article-title":"Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice","volume":"102","author":"Kahn","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10047.x","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality","volume":"105","author":"Hilder","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R19-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.319.7205.287","article-title":"Prospective risk of unexplained stillbirth in singleton pregnancies at term: population based analysis","volume":"319","author":"Cotzias","year":"1999","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R20-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2007.07.002","article-title":"Shoulder dystocia: an update","volume":"34","author":"Gottlieb","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"R21-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(86)90668-X","article-title":"The influence of prolonged pregnancy on infant development at one and two years of age: a prospective controlled study","volume":"154","author":"Shime","year":"1986","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R22-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211385","article-title":"Have the year 2000 neonatal resuscitation program guidelines changed the delivery room management or outcome of meconium-stained infants?","volume":"25","author":"Kabbur","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"R23-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816499f4","article-title":"Late-preterm birth: does the changing obstetric paradigm alter the epidemiology of respiratory complications?","volume":"111","author":"Yoder","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R24-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01262.x","article-title":"Intrapartum amnioinfusion for meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials","volume":"114","author":"Xu","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R25-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.317.7172.1554","article-title":"Intrapartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study","volume":"317","author":"Badawi","year":"1998","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R26-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.08.040","article-title":"Maternal and obstetric complications of pregnancy are associated with increasing gestational age at term","volume":"196","author":"Caughey","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R27-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"950","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701416929","article-title":"Women's experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for postterm pregnancy","volume":"86","author":"Heimstad","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"R28-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034","article-title":"First- vs second-trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes","volume":"198","author":"Caughey","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R29-3-20210129","first-page":"CD000170","article-title":"Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term.","volume":"2","author":"Crowley","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R30-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1991.tb02759.x","article-title":"Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis in postdate pregnancies","volume":"31","author":"Stokes","year":"1991","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R31-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80005-X","article-title":"The efficacy of starting postterm antenatal testing at 41 weeks as compared with 42 weeks of gestational age","volume":"159","author":"Bochner","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R32-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211528","article-title":"The impact of the interaction between increasing gestational age and obstetrical risk on birth outcomes: evidence of a varying optimal time of delivery","volume":"26","author":"Nicholson","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"R33-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"989","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02417.x","article-title":"The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study","volume":"110","author":"Morris","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R34-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2004.11.006","article-title":"Comparison of preinduction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting risk of cesarean section after labor induction with prostaglandins","volume":"33","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"R35-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in postterm pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Multicenter Postterm Pregnancy Trial Group","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R36-3-20210129","first-page":"1445","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour versus serial antenatal monitoring in the Canadian Multicentre Postterm Pregnancy Trial","volume":"152","author":"Goeree","year":"1995","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"R37-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01004.x","article-title":"Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks gestation: nonsensus consensus","volume":"109","author":"Menticoglou","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R38-3-20210129","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.","volume":"4","author":"Gulmezoglu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R39-3-20210129","first-page":"1312","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"101","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R40-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017","article-title":"Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis","volume":"49","author":"Crane","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R41-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1516","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.07.002","article-title":"Active management of risk in pregnancy at term in an urban population: an association between a higher induction of labor rate and a lower cesarean delivery rate","volume":"191","author":"Nicholson","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R42-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.037","article-title":"The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"198","author":"Nicholson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R43-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1432","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1996.03530420060037","article-title":"Reestimating date of delivery in multifetal pregnancies","volume":"275","author":"Minakami","year":"1996","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R44-3-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00870.x","article-title":"Membrane sweeping and prevention of postterm pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"113","author":"de Miranda","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1097\/GCO.0b013e328314b6f8","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T17:12:43Z","timestamp":1786036363000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00001703-200812000-00003"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/gco.0b013e328314b6f8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-872X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-872X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]}}}