{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T09:45:26Z","timestamp":1791971126073,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/gco.0b013e32832ae0b3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,14]],"date-time":"2009-07-14T03:21:54Z","timestamp":1247541714000},"page":"348-352","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Antepartum fetal testing: a critical appraisal"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Frank A","family":"Manning","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(72)90279-7","article-title":"Clinical experience with the oxytocin challenge test","volume":"114","author":"Ray","year":"1972","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R3-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(79)90407-1","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal heart rate testing and neonatal outcome following a positive contraction stress test","volume":"113","author":"Gauthier","year":"1979","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R4-11-20210129","first-page":"19","article-title":"Fetal activity acceleration for the determination for the evaluation of fetal reserve","volume":"46","author":"Lee","year":"1976","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R5-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(79)90406-X","article-title":"Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. I: Evaluation of the nonstress test","volume":"133","author":"Evertson","year":"1979","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R6-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90008-4","article-title":"A prospective multiinstitutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I: Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results","volume":"143","author":"Freeman","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R7-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(80)90457-3","article-title":"Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile score","volume":"136","author":"Manning","year":"1980","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R8-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90002-Z","article-title":"Fetal biophysical profile score. VI: Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH","volume":"169","author":"Manning","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R9-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90990-O","article-title":"Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. IV: An analysis of perinatal morbidity and mortality","volume":"162","author":"Manning","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4101","article-title":"Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"30","author":"Turan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R12-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.074","article-title":"Biophysical profile in the treatment of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses who weigh less than 1000 g","volume":"199","author":"Kaur","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R13-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(84)90359-4","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid. I: The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic volume to perinatal outcome","volume":"154","author":"Chamberlain","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R14-11-20210129","first-page":"737","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket: weak indicators of abnormal amniotic fluid volume","volume":"96","author":"Magann","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R15-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1610","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.069","article-title":"Is there a relationship to dye determined or ultrasound estimated amniotic fluid volume adjusted percentiles and fetal weight adjusted percentiles","volume":"190","author":"Magann","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R16-11-20210129","first-page":"353","article-title":"The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing","volume":"70","author":"Rutherford","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R17-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2802","article-title":"The influence of fetal position on amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket","volume":"28","author":"Fok","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-986689","article-title":"The evidence for abandoning the amniotic fluid index in favor of the single deepest pocket","volume":"24","author":"Magann","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R19-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.10.018","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials","volume":"104","author":"Nabhan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R20-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70339-6","article-title":"Perinatal outcome with a modified biophysical profile","volume":"170","author":"Nageotte","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R21-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70479-X","article-title":"Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. VIII: The incidence of cerebral palsy in tested and untested perinates","volume":"178","author":"Manning","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R22-11-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6286","article-title":"Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: relationship of antepartum surveillance parameters","volume":"33","author":"Baschat","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1097\/GCO.0b013e32832ae0b3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T17:59:13Z","timestamp":1786039153000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00001703-200908000-00011"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/gco.0b013e32832ae0b3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-872X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-872X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]}}}