{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,16]],"date-time":"2024-01-16T15:58:23Z","timestamp":1705420703329},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/gco.0b013e328345522a","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,3]],"date-time":"2011-03-03T07:45:38Z","timestamp":1299138338000},"page":"200-205","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Is there still a role for reconstructive microsurgery in tubal infertility?"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Cordula","family":"Schippert","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Guillermo-Jos\u00e9","family":"Garcia-Rocha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-10-20210129","first-page":"CD006415","article-title":"Surgery for tubal infertility.","volume":"3","author":"Pandian","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R2-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1249315","article-title":"Organ-preserving and reconstructive microsurgery of the fallopian tubes in tubal infertility: still an alternative to in vitro fertilization (IVF)","volume":"26","author":"Schippert","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Reconstr Microsurg"},{"key":"R3-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00361-0","article-title":"Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: a report on 1118 cases","volume":"68","author":"Kim","year":"1997","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R5-10-20210129","first-page":"470","article-title":"K, Bals-Pratsch M, Kupka MS; the Board of Trustees. DIR Annual 2009.","volume":"7","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol"},{"key":"R7-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1312","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq023","article-title":"IVF and stillbirth: a prospective follow-up study","volume":"25","author":"Wisborg","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R8-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)32112-0","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology","volume":"28","author":"Allen","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"R9-10-20210129","first-page":"11","article-title":"The risk of malformation following assisted reproduction","volume":"105","author":"Bertelsmann","year":"2008","journal-title":"Dtsch Arztebl Int"},{"key":"R10-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-004-8760-8","article-title":"A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children","volume":"21","author":"Rimm","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"R11-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.02.041","article-title":"Infertility surgery is dead: only the obituary remains?","volume":"89","author":"Feinberg","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R12-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2004.010231","article-title":"The new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (Law 40\/2004)","volume":"31","author":"Fineschi","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"key":"R14-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1851","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq124","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE","volume":"25","author":"De Mouzon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R15-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000196503.78126.62","article-title":"Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures","volume":"107","author":"Clayton","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R16-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1097\/01.gco.0000084245.09900.dd","article-title":"Salpingoscopy [review]","volume":"15","author":"Marana","year":"2003","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R17-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-007-0344-z","article-title":"Indications to tubal reconstructive surgery in the era of IVF","volume":"5","author":"Marana","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"R18-10-20210129","first-page":"341","article-title":"A pelvic scoring system for infertility surgery","volume":"33","author":"Wu","year":"1988","journal-title":"Int J Fertil"},{"key":"R19-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1236","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00408.x","article-title":"The predictive value of the \u2018Hull & Rutherford\u2019 classification for tubal damage","volume":"111","author":"Akande","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R20-10-20210129","article-title":"Rekonstruktive Tubenchirurgie (reconstructive surgery of the fallopian tubes)","author":"Gauwerky","year":"1999"},{"key":"R21-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1053\/beog.2002.0319","article-title":"Chlamydia infection and subfertility [review]","volume":"16","author":"Land","year":"2002","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R22-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01203950","article-title":"Tubal surgery or in vitro fertilization (IVF)?","volume":"9","author":"Winston","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"R23-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)53362-7","article-title":"Reversal of sterilization in women over 40 years of age: a multicenter survey in The Netherlands","volume":"53","author":"Trimbos-Kemper","year":"1990","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"R24-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S52","DOI":"10.1080\/1464770312331369273","article-title":"Surgical intervention in infertility management.","volume":"6","author":"Lok","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Fertil (Camb)"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"R25-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.suppl_1.120","article-title":"Tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: clinical options [review]","volume":"14","author":"Posaci","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R26-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)49091-6","article-title":"Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study","volume":"45","author":"Boer-Meisel","year":"1986","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R27-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00484-6","article-title":"The significance of hydrosalpinx in in vitro fertilization [review]","volume":"69","author":"Nackley","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R28-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2339","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138448","article-title":"Should lysis of adhesions be performed when in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer are available?","volume":"9","author":"Oelsner","year":"1994","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R29-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.5.1141","article-title":"Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid [review]","volume":"17","author":"Strandell","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R30-10-20210129","first-page":"CD002125","article-title":"Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation [review].","volume":"1","author":"Johnson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R31-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)49511-7","article-title":"Prognostic factors of fimbrial microsurgery","volume":"46","author":"Donnez","year":"1986","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R33-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)49932-2","article-title":"Microsurgical reconstruction of the proximal oviduct","volume":"47","author":"Paton","year":"1987","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R34-10-20210129","first-page":"338","article-title":"Proximal tubal occlusion: microsurgery versus IVF: a review","volume":"33","author":"Marana","year":"1988","journal-title":"Int J Fertil"},{"key":"R35-10-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.05.009","article-title":"Tubal reanastomosis or IVF? [letter to the editor]","volume":"90","author":"Muzii","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/GCO.0b013e328345522a","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,14]],"date-time":"2021-05-14T00:17:13Z","timestamp":1620951433000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00001703-201106000-00010"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/gco.0b013e328345522a","relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-872X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-872X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]}}}