{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:31:33Z","timestamp":1786120293447,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/gco.0b013e32834da49a","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,27]],"date-time":"2011-10-27T02:53:20Z","timestamp":1319684000000},"page":"38-43","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Screening mammography in women less than age 50 years"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Karla","family":"Kerlikowske","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.20008","article-title":"Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.","volume":"59","author":"Smith","year":"2009","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"R2-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.171.1.9648758","article-title":"American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening.","volume":"171","author":"Feig","year":"1998","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"R3-8-20210129","first-page":"372","article-title":"Practice Bulletin 122. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.","volume":"118","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R4-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008","article-title":"S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.","volume":"151","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R5-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009","article-title":"Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.","volume":"151","author":"Nelson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R7-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-137-5_Part_1-200209030-00012","article-title":"Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.","volume":"137","author":"Humphrey","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R8-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1093\/jncimono\/1997.22.79","article-title":"Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefit.","volume":"22","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"1997","journal-title":"Mongraph Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"R9-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-137-5_Part_1-200209030-00005","article-title":"The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: Breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up.","volume":"137","author":"Miller","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R10-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10091881","article-title":"Time trends in screening mammography performance from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.","volume":"256","author":"Ichikawa","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R11-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1001","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.169.4.9308451","article-title":"Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database.","volume":"169","author":"Ballard-Barbash","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"R12-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00010","article-title":"Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.","volume":"151","author":"Mandelblatt","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R13-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5140","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2010.29.5121","article-title":"Changes in invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ rates in relation to the decline in hormone therapy use.","volume":"28","author":"Farhat","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"R14-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"692","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djq090","article-title":"Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.","volume":"102","author":"Yankaskas","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"R15-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004","article-title":"Cumulative risk of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography.","volume":"155","author":"Hubbard","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R16-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1497.2001.00329.x","article-title":"Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.","volume":"16","author":"Barton","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"key":"R17-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djh083","article-title":"Decreasing womens anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial.","volume":"96","author":"Barton","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"R18-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1002\/1099-1611(200009\/10)9:5<402::AID-PON475>3.0.CO;2-U","article-title":"The impact of abnormal mammograms on psychosocial outcomes and subsequent screening.","volume":"9","author":"Lipkus","year":"2000","journal-title":"Psychooncology"},{"key":"R19-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.51.6.705","article-title":"Distressed or relieved Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands.","volume":"51","author":"Scaf-Klomp","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"R20-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.904","article-title":"The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review.","volume":"14","author":"Brett","year":"2005","journal-title":"Psychooncology"},{"key":"R21-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.314.7082.754","article-title":"Positive findings of mammography may lead to suicide.","volume":"314","author":"Weil","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R22-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2001.01635.x","article-title":"Womens anxieties surrounding breast disorders: a systematic review of the literature.","volume":"33","author":"Woodward","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"key":"R23-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-146-7-200704030-00006","article-title":"Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.","volume":"146","author":"Brewer","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R24-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10100655","article-title":"Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.","volume":"258","author":"Yaffe","year":"2011","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R25-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1214","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2011.67","article-title":"Population-based mammography screening below age 50: balancing radiation-induced vs prevented breast cancer deaths.","volume":"104","author":"De Gelder","year":"2011","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"R26-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6602683","article-title":"Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits.","volume":"93","author":"Berrington de Gonzalez","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"R27-8-20210129","first-page":"680","article-title":"Breast cancer screening: evidence for false reassurance Int J C","volume":"123","author":"De Gelder","year":"2008","journal-title":"ancer"},{"key":"R28-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-146-7-200704030-00008","article-title":"Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians.","volume":"146","author":"Armstrong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R29-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr1369","article-title":"Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: microsimulation modelling estimates based on observed screen and clinical data.","volume":"8","author":"De Koning","year":"2006","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"R30-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr1346","article-title":"Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: rates of ductal carcinoma in situ: a US perspective.","volume":"7","author":"Kumar","year":"2005","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"R31-8-20210129","first-page":"1276","article-title":"Screening mammography: a long run for a short slide N Engl J M","volume":"363","author":"Welch","year":"2010","journal-title":"ed"},{"key":"R32-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1093\/epirev\/mxr009","article-title":"Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening.","volume":"33","author":"De Gelder","year":"2011","journal-title":"Epidemiol Rev"},{"key":"R33-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1546","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/94.20.1546","article-title":"Detection of DCIS in women undergoing screening mammography.","volume":"94","author":"Ernster","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"R34-8-20210129","first-page":"223","article-title":"Long-term follow-up of in situ carcinoma of the breast.","volume":"11","author":"Eusebi","year":"1994","journal-title":"Semin Diagn Pathol"},{"key":"R35-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1692","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djg097","article-title":"Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy.","volume":"95","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"R36-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19951001)76:7<1197::AID-CNCR2820760715>3.0.CO;2-0","article-title":"Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15-25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy.","volume":"76","author":"Page","year":"1995","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"R37-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djq101","article-title":"Biomarker expression associated with increased risk of subsequent tumors after initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.","volume":"102","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"R38-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.","volume":"353","author":"Pisano","year":"2005","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R39-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005","article-title":"Comparative-effectiveness of digital vs. film-screen mammography in community practice in the U.S.","volume":"155","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R40-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00002","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.","volume":"148","author":"Tosteson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R41-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00004","article-title":"Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.","volume":"148","author":"Tice","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R42-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1204","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djj331","article-title":"Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography.","volume":"98","author":"Barlow","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"R43-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djj332","article-title":"Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density.","volume":"98","author":"Chen","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"R44-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00003","article-title":"Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.","volume":"155","author":"Schousboe","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R45-8-20210129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.09091086","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.","volume":"254","author":"Lee","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiology"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1097\/GCO.0b013e32834da49a","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T20:28:05Z","timestamp":1786048085000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00001703-201202000-00008"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/gco.0b013e32834da49a","relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-872X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-872X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]}}}