{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:06:26Z","timestamp":1786118786853,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,6]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/grf.0b013e31804b1be6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,18]],"date-time":"2007-05-18T17:36:17Z","timestamp":1179509777000},"page":"425-439","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Innovations in Contraception: A Review"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"50","author":[{"given":"ROBERT K.","family":"ZURAWIN","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"LESLIE","family":"AYENSU-COKER","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.2307\/2135494","article-title":"The sexual and reproductive behavior of American women, 1982-1988","volume":"22","author":"Forrest","year":"1990","journal-title":"Fam Plann Perspect"},{"key":"R2-11-20210126","first-page":"405","article-title":"Contraceptive Technology","author":"Hatcher","year":"1998"},{"key":"R3-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.318.7176.96","article-title":"Mortality associated with oral contraceptive use: 25-year follow-up of cohort of 46,000 women from Royal College of general Practitioners oral contraception study","volume":"318","author":"Beral","year":"1999","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R4-11-20210126","first-page":"335","article-title":"Unintended pregnancies and use, misuse and discontinuation of oral contraceptives","volume":"40","author":"Rosenberg","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"R5-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(95)00074-K","article-title":"Use and misuse of oral contraceptives: risk indicators for poor pill taking and discontinuation.","volume":"51","author":"Rosenberg","year":"1995","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R6-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.3949\/ccjm.70.8.681","article-title":"Update on contraception: benefits and risks of the new formulations","volume":"70","author":"Batur","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cleveland Clin J Med"},{"key":"R7-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1290","DOI":"10.4065\/81.10.1290","article-title":"Oral contraceptive use as a risk factor for premenopausal breast cancer: a meta-analysis","volume":"81","author":"Kahlenborn","year":"2006","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc"},{"key":"R8-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(03)00141-0","article-title":"A multicenter, randomized study of an extended cycle oral contraceptive.","volume":"68","author":"Anderson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R9-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)63015-2","article-title":"End of the line for \u201cthird generation-pill\u201d controversy?","volume":"349","author":"Vandenbrouck","year":"1997","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R10-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00083-4","article-title":"An open-label, multicenter study to evaluate yasmin, a low dose combination oral contraceptive containing drospirenone, a new progestogen","volume":"61","author":"Parsey","year":"2000","journal-title":"Elsevier Science Contraception"},{"key":"R11-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00351-7","article-title":"Quick start: a novel oral contraceptive initiation method","volume":"66","author":"Westoff","year":"2002","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R12-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2347","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.285.18.2347","article-title":"Evaluation of contraception efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs. an oral contraceptive","volume":"285","author":"Audet","year":"2001","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R13-11-20210126","first-page":"799","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of a transdermal contraceptive system","volume":"98","author":"Smallwood","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R14-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)85161-9","article-title":"Comparison of efficacy, cycle control, compliance, and safety in users of a contraceptive patch vs. an oral contraceptive","volume":"70","author":"Hedon","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R15-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00514-0","article-title":"The combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing: an international study of user acceptability","volume":"67","author":"Novak","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R16-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh604","article-title":"Superior cycle control with a contraceptive vaginal ring compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30\u2009mcg ethinyl estradiol and 150 mcg levonorgestrel: a randomized trial","volume":"20","author":"Oddson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R17-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.11.003","article-title":"Acceptability and satisfaction using Quick Start with the Contraceptive vaginal ring versus an oral contraceptive","volume":"73","author":"Schafer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R18-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(87)90012-6","article-title":"Effective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 12-month report of a European multicenter Study","volume":"36","author":"Luukkainen","year":"1987","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R19-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2265.1982.tb01625.x","article-title":"Tissue concentrations of levonorgestrel in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD","volume":"17","author":"Nilsson","year":"1982","journal-title":"Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)"},{"key":"R20-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59881-1","article-title":"New insights on the mode of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices in women","volume":"49","author":"Alvarez","year":"1988","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R21-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(96)00189-8","article-title":"Detailed analysis of menstrual bleeding patterns after postmenopausal and postabortal insertion of a copper IUD or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system","volume":"54","author":"Suvisaari","year":"1996","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R22-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11610.x","article-title":"Levonorgestrel-releasing (20\u2009mg\/day) intrauterine systems (Mirena) compared with other methods of reversible contraceptives","volume":"107","author":"French","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R23-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/S1083-3188(02)00214-0","article-title":"The role of surgical techniques in the treatment of menstrual problems and as contraception in adolescents with disabilities","volume":"16","author":"Zurawin","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol"},{"key":"R24-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2006.05.014","article-title":"Adolescents and IUCDs\u2014not a contraindication","volume":"19","author":"McNaught","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Pediatgr Adoles Gynecol"},{"key":"R25-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2001.tb01311.x","article-title":"The safety and effectiveness of a new hysteroscopic method for permanent birth control: results of the first Essure pbc clinical study","volume":"41","author":"Kerin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R26-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg256","article-title":"Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre phase II study","volume":"18","author":"Kerin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R27-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.12.032","article-title":"Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting","volume":"82","author":"Ubeda","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R28-11-20210126","first-page":"25","article-title":"Clinical Experience With Essure Permanent Birth Control in 745 Women","author":"Cooper","year":"2002"},{"key":"R29-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(04)80344-X","article-title":"Adiana Hysteroscopic Sterilization: Interim Results of the EASE Clinical Trial","author":"Vancaille","year":"2004"},{"key":"R30-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70658-0","article-title":"The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization","volume":"174","author":"Peterson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R31-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jemermed.2005.01.009","article-title":"Major vascular injury after laparoscopic tubal ligation","volume":"29","author":"Moore","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Emerg Med"},{"key":"R32-11-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2005.05.016","article-title":"Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis","volume":"12","author":"Levie","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00003081-200706000-00011","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T16:42:38Z","timestamp":1786034558000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00003081-200706000-00011"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,6]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/grf.0b013e31804b1be6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0009-9201"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0009-9201","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,6]]}}}