{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,26]],"date-time":"2026-03-26T06:24:00Z","timestamp":1774506240547,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":65,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/grf.0b013e318263c547","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,19]],"date-time":"2012-10-19T14:08:20Z","timestamp":1350655700000},"page":"946-960","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Managing the Primary Cesarean Delivery Rate"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"55","author":[{"given":"DAVID WARE","family":"BRANCH","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"ROBERT M.","family":"SILVER","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R3-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182266682","article-title":"How to stop the relentless rise in cesarean deliveries.","volume":"118","author":"Queenan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R5-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5","article-title":"National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: New Insights.","volume":"115","author":"Cunningham","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R6-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.","volume":"118","author":"Barber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R7-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318204521a","article-title":"The singleton, cephalic, nulliparous woman after 26 weeks of gestation. Contribution to overall cesarean delivery rates.","volume":"117","author":"Brennan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R8-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e10c5c","article-title":"Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term.","volume":"116","author":"Ehrenthal","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R10-14-20210126","first-page":"16","article-title":"Collaboration in maternity care: a randomized controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care.","volume":"108","author":"Homer","year":"2001","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R11-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1026580929659","article-title":"Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.","volume":"26","author":"Hueston","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Community Health"},{"key":"R13-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","article-title":"Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international Randomized Term Breech Trial.","volume":"191","author":"Whyte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R14-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000260387.69720.5d","article-title":"Intrapartum management of twin gestation.","volume":"109","author":"Cruikshank","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R15-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d55925","article-title":"The natural history of the normal first stage of labor.","volume":"115","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R16-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","article-title":"Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.","volume":"116","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R17-14-20210126","first-page":"550","article-title":"Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2 hour minimum.","volume":"98","author":"Rouse","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199202133260705","article-title":"A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor.","volume":"326","author":"Lopez-Zeno","year":"1992","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R19-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199509213331201","article-title":"A clinical trial of active management of labor.","volume":"333","author":"Frigoletto","year":"1995","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R21-14-20210126","first-page":"CD004907","article-title":"Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women.","volume":"4","author":"Brown","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R22-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09734.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of early vs delayed use of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion in nulliparous labor.","volume":"103","author":"Cammu","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R23-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11091.x","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis of active management of labour.","volume":"107","author":"Sadler","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R24-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1080\/0144361021000043137","article-title":"Active management of labour in a district hospital setting.","volume":"23","author":"Tabowei","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R25-14-20210126","first-page":"20","article-title":"Reducing cesarean delivery rates: an active management labor program in a setting with limited resources.","volume":"88","author":"Somprasit","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"R26-14-20210126","first-page":"CD007863","article-title":"Continuous CTG as a form of electronic fetal monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.","volume":"3","author":"Alifirevic","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R27-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90619-2","article-title":"The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.","volume":"152","author":"MacDonald","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R28-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823d8230","article-title":"ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis.","volume":"119","author":"Becker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R29-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90273-L","article-title":"Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 cases.","volume":"169","author":"Westgate","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R30-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)82012-7","article-title":"Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus PR-interval analysis in intrapartum surveillance: a randomised, multicentre trial. FECG Study Group.","volume":"355","author":"Strachan","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R31-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)05703-8","article-title":"Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial.","volume":"358","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R32-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00886.x","article-title":"A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocographya randomised controlled study.","volume":"113","author":"Ojala","year":"2006","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R33-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.007","article-title":"A French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor.","volume":"197","author":"Vayssiere","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R34-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181dfffd6","article-title":"Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial.","volume":"115","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R35-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(79)90352-1","article-title":"The influence of scalp sampling on the cesarean section rate for fetal distress.","volume":"135","author":"Zalar","year":"1979","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R37-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial.","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R39-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000192168.48738.77","article-title":"Simulation training and resident performance of singleton vaginal breech delivery.","volume":"107","author":"Deering","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R40-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2008.03.007","article-title":"Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends and outcomes.","volume":"35","author":"MacDorman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"R41-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.64","article-title":"Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"186","author":"Hogle","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R42-14-20210126","first-page":"25","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor.","volume":"56","author":"Vardo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"R43-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2239-0","article-title":"Maternal outcome monitoring: induction of labor versus spontaneous onset of labora retrospective analysis.","volume":"286","author":"Kiesewetter","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R44-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c4ef96","article-title":"Term labor induction compared with expectant management.","volume":"115","author":"Glantz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R45-14-20210126","first-page":"287","article-title":"Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates.","volume":"102","author":"Heffner","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R46-14-20210126","first-page":"164","article-title":"Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies.","volume":"100","author":"Rayburn","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R47-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","article-title":"Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions.","volume":"180","author":"Yeast","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R48-14-20210126","first-page":"CD000160","article-title":"Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term.","volume":"2","author":"Crowley","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R49-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90752-X","article-title":"Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor.","volume":"148","author":"Smith","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R50-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819c9e3d","article-title":"Labor induction process improvement. A patient quality-of-care initiative.","volume":"113","author":"Fisch","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R51-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"804","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819b5c8c","article-title":"Women and Newborn Clinical Integration Program. Decreasing elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in an integrated health care system.","volume":"113","author":"Oshiro","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R53-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1037\/a0017327","article-title":"How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.","volume":"135","author":"Reyna","year":"2009","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"R54-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"884","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1497.2003.21102.x","article-title":"A randomized comparison of patients understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats.","volume":"18","author":"Sheridan","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"key":"R56-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-837738","article-title":"Evaluation of the impact of birth preparation courses on the health of the mother and newborn.","volume":"22","author":"Mehdizadeh","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R59-14-20210126","first-page":"37","article-title":"Nurse-midwifery at Gunderson clinic: a twenty year review.","volume":"96","author":"DeLano","year":"1997","journal-title":"Wis Med J"},{"key":"R60-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/0091-2182(94)90016-7","article-title":"Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians.","volume":"39","author":"Davis","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Nurse Midwifery"},{"key":"R62-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822ac86f","article-title":"Obstetrician and nurse-midwife collaboration: successful public health and private practice partnership.","volume":"118","author":"Shaw-Battista","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R63-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822ac37f","article-title":"A northwest collaborative practice model.","volume":"118","author":"Darlington","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R64-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1996.tb00473.x","article-title":"A randomized, controlled trial of nurse-midwifery care.","volume":"23","author":"Harvey","year":"1996","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R65-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1177\/107755879605300405","article-title":"Equalizing physician fees had little effect on cesarean rates.","volume":"53","author":"Keeler","year":"1996","journal-title":"Med Care Res Rev"},{"key":"R66-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2008.02.013","article-title":"Financial incentives do not always workan example of cesarean sections in Taiwan.","volume":"88","author":"Lo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"key":"R67-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2012.136","article-title":"Health care cost and value. The way forward.","volume":"307","author":"McMahon","year":"2012","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R68-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2202","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1991.03460170056033","article-title":"Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines.","volume":"265","author":"Lomas","year":"1991","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R69-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00553-X","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial on the effect of the Dutch peer review system.","volume":"102","author":"Elferink-Stinkens","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"R70-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00024-5","article-title":"Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: a statewide program.","volume":"87","author":"Bickell","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R71-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.3961\/jpmph.2011.44.1.2","article-title":"Effect of repeated public releases on cesarean section rates.","volume":"44","author":"Jang","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Prev Med Pub Health"},{"key":"R72-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70394-0","article-title":"Using the medical audit cycle to reduce the cesarean section rates.","volume":"174","author":"Robson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R73-14-20210126","first-page":"1013","article-title":"Effect of departmental policies on cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience.","volume":"91","author":"Poma","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R74-14-20210126","first-page":"281","article-title":"Effect of peer review and trial of labor on lowering cesarean section rates.","volume":"67","author":"Liang","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Chin Med Assoc"},{"key":"R75-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70392-7","article-title":"Decreasing the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: success without mandated clinical changes.","volume":"174","author":"Lagrew","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R76-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1523-536x.1998.00117.x","article-title":"Reducing cesarean section rates safely: lessons from a breakthrough series collaborative.","volume":"25","author":"Flamm","year":"1998","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R77-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1934","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16406-4","article-title":"Mandatory second opinion to reduce the rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomized controlled trial.","volume":"363","author":"Althabe","year":"2004","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R78-14-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00146.x","article-title":"Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis.","volume":"34","author":"Chaillet","year":"2007","journal-title":"Birth"}],"container-title":["Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00003081-201212000-00014","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,14]],"date-time":"2021-04-14T01:55:34Z","timestamp":1618365334000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00003081-201212000-00014"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"references-count":65,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/grf.0b013e318263c547","relation":{},"ISSN":["0009-9201"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0009-9201","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}}}