{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:31:11Z","timestamp":1786120271549,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/icu.0b013e32834e4b5f","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,2]],"date-time":"2011-12-02T10:56:49Z","timestamp":1322823409000},"page":"3-6","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":57,"title":["The changing fate of the corneal endothelium in cataract surgery"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Noel","family":"Rosado-Adames","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Natalie A.","family":"Afshari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1981.03930020249006","article-title":"Corneal trauma in intracapsular and extracapsular cataract extraction with lens implantation.","volume":"99","author":"Bourne","year":"1981","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R2-3-20210206","first-page":"177","article-title":"The state of corneal endothelium after cataract extraction as examined by contact endothelial microscopy.","volume":"94","author":"Gierek-Lapinska","year":"1992","journal-title":"Klin Oczna"},{"key":"R3-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/S0146-2776(84)80075-0","article-title":"Endothelial cell loss during the transition from nucleus expression to posterior chamber-iris plane phacoemulsification.","volume":"10","author":"Davison","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Am Intraocular Implant Soc"},{"key":"R4-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.09.023","article-title":"Comparison of endothelial cell loss after cataract surgery: phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery: six-week results of a randomized control trial.","volume":"36","author":"Gogate","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R5-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.3126\/nepjoph.v3i2.5273","article-title":"Endothelial cell loss after small incision cataract surgery.","volume":"3","author":"Thakur","year":"2011","journal-title":"Nepal J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R6-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2003.07.015","article-title":"Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium, modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery.","volume":"111","author":"Bourne","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R7-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2415-11-9","article-title":"Viscoat versus visthesia during phacoemulsification cataract surgery: corneal and foveal changes.","volume":"11","author":"Moschos","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R8-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)00462-9","article-title":"Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: relation to preoperative and intraoperative parameters.","volume":"26","author":"Walkow","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R9-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(96)80272-0","article-title":"Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification through a temporal clear corneal incision.","volume":"22","author":"Dick","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R10-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.3928\/15428877-20100303-13","article-title":"Ultrasound energy in phacoemulsification: a comparative analysis of phaco-chop and stop-and-chop techniques according to the degree of nuclear density.","volume":"41","author":"Park","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ophthal Surg Lasers Imaging"},{"key":"R11-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"996","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.02.013","article-title":"Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop technique.","volume":"34","author":"Storr-Paulsen","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R12-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1971","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.05.034","article-title":"Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: bevel-up vs. bevel-down phaco tip.","volume":"37","author":"Faramarzi","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R13-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e31820142d9","article-title":"Corneal endothelial cell changes associated with cataract surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.","volume":"30","author":"Hugod","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"R14-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e3181eadb4b","article-title":"Endothelial cell loss and central corneal thickness in patients with and without diabetes after manual small incision cataract surgery.","volume":"30","author":"Mathew","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"R15-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1419","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.02.025","article-title":"Cataract surgery in eyes with low corneal endothelial cell density.","volume":"37","author":"Hayashi","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R16-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2004.10.044","article-title":"Cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs corneal dystrophy expanding recommendations for cataract surgery without simultaneous keratoplasty.","volume":"112","author":"Seitzman","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R17-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2013","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.05.033","article-title":"Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in eyes with previous penetrating keratoplasty, previous deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, or no previous surgery.","volume":"37","author":"Acar","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R18-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e3181c11e0e","article-title":"A comparison of endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in penetrating keratoplasty patients and normal patients.","volume":"29","author":"Kim","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"R19-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1972","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.05.023","article-title":"Protective effect of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on corneal endothelial cells during phacoemulsification: rabbit model.","volume":"36","author":"Ben-Eliahu","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R20-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S22879","article-title":"Torsional ultrasound mode versus combined torsional and conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification for eyes with hard cataract.","volume":"5","author":"Fakhry","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R21-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"984","DOI":"10.1177\/112067210901900614","article-title":"Comparison of conventional and torsional mode (OZil) phacoemulsification: randomized prospective clinical study.","volume":"19","author":"Bozkurt","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R22-3-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2010.24.6.336","article-title":"The comparison between torsional and conventional mode phacoemulsification in moderate and hard cataracts.","volume":"24","author":"Kim","year":"2010","journal-title":"Kor J Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1097\/ICU.0b013e32834e4b5f","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T20:25:01Z","timestamp":1786047901000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00055735-201201000-00003"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/icu.0b013e32834e4b5f","relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-8738"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-8738","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]}}}