{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T23:00:30Z","timestamp":1788562830798,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,1]],"date-time":"2014-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1409529600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Innovations\ufffd(Phila)"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]},"abstract":"\n Objective<\/jats:title>\n The objective of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n The study population included 2091 consecutive patients who underwent either conventional or robotic CABG from January 2007 to March 2012. Preoperative, intraoperative, and 30-day postoperative variables were collected for each group. To compare the incidence of rapid recovery between conventional and robotic CABG, the surrogate variables of early discharge and discharge to home (vs rehabilitation or acute care facility) were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n One hundred fifty robotic and 1619 conventional CABG cases were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that robotic surgery was astrongpredictoroflower30-day complications [odds ratio (OR), 0.24; P =0.005], short length of stay (OR, 3.31; P < 0.001), and decreased need for an acute care facility (OR, 0.55; P = 0.032). In the presence of complications (New York State Complication Composite), the robotic technique was not associated with a change in discharge status.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n In this retrospective review, robotic CABG was associated with a lower 30-day complication rate, a shorter length of stay, and a lower incidence of acute care facility discharge than conventional on-pump CABG. It may suggest a more rapid recovery to preoperative status after robotic surgery; however, only a randomized prospective study could confirm the advantages of a robotic approach.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/imi.0000000000000095","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,19]],"date-time":"2014-09-19T08:09:10Z","timestamp":1411114150000},"page":"361-367","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Decreases 30-Day Complication Rate, Length of Stay, and Acute Care Facility Discharge Rate Compared with Conventional Surgery"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Galina","family":"Leyvi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephen J.","family":"Forest","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vankeepuram S.","family":"Srinivas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Greenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nan","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alec","family":"Mais","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Max J.","family":"Snyder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"suffix":"Jr","given":"Joseph J.","family":"DeRose","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.68.5.939","volume":"68","author":"Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery.","year":"1983","journal-title":"Circulation."},{"key":"bibr2-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199607253350401","volume":"335","author":"Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease.","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med."},{"key":"bibr3-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0804626"},{"key":"bibr4-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000175005"},{"key":"bibr5-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/imi.0b013e3181c49e8b"},{"key":"bibr6-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198601023140101"},{"key":"bibr7-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-4975(97)00017-9"},{"key":"bibr8-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semtcvs.2009.08.004"},{"key":"bibr9-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10353-011-0032-0"},{"key":"bibr10-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2010.10.020"},{"key":"bibr11-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2011.05.090"},{"key":"bibr12-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2007.09.025"},{"key":"bibr13-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-8183.2012.00752.x"},{"key":"bibr14-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.052571"},{"key":"bibr15-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1211666"},{"key":"bibr16-imi.0000000000000095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1301228"}],"container-title":["Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/imi.0000000000000095","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/imi.0000000000000095","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T11:20:36Z","timestamp":1777461636000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1097\/imi.0000000000000095"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1097\/imi.0000000000000095"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/imi.0000000000000095","relation":{},"ISSN":["1556-9845","1559-0879"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1556-9845","type":"print"},{"value":"1559-0879","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]}}}