{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T10:53:56Z","timestamp":1785408836908,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,4]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/lgt.0000000000000079","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,26]],"date-time":"2014-09-26T11:24:01Z","timestamp":1411730641000},"page":"115-118","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Is There Any Predictor for Residual Disease After Cervical Conization With Positive Surgical Margins for HSIL or Microinvasive Cervical Cancer?"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Tolga","family":"Tasci","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Taner","family":"Turan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Isin","family":"Ureyen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alper","family":"Karalok","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rukiye","family":"Kalyoncu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nurettin","family":"Boran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gokhan","family":"Tulunay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2011.04.007","article-title":"Management options for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.","volume":"25","author":"Petry","year":"2011","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R2-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(91)90079-K","article-title":"Invasive carcinoma after cone biopsy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.","volume":"40","author":"Brown","year":"1991","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"R3-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(07)70283-8","article-title":"Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis.","volume":"8","author":"Ghaem-Maghami","year":"2007","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"R4-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1298","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11623.x","article-title":"Does histological incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following large loop excision of transformation zone increase recurrence rates A six year cytological follow up.","volume":"107","author":"Dobbs","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R5-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1427","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2147-8","article-title":"Prediction based on resection margins, of long-term outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 treated by Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization.","volume":"285","author":"Miyoshi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R6-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-009-1298-3","article-title":"Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.","volume":"282","author":"Baloglu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R7-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1111\/apm.12064","article-title":"Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions.","volume":"121","author":"Simoes","year":"2013","journal-title":"APMIS"},{"key":"R8-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(01)00523-9","article-title":"Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.","volume":"76","author":"Milojkovic","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R9-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2010.08.135","article-title":"Predictors of recurrence in high-grade cervical lesions and a plan of management.","volume":"36","author":"Leguevaque","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"R10-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)90001-8","article-title":"3rd, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGOCommittee on Gynecologic Oncology.","volume":"70","author":"Benedet","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R11-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1247","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03429.x","article-title":"Adverse obstetrical outcomes after treatment of precancerous cervical lesions: a Belgian multicentre study.","volume":"119","author":"Simoens","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R13-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1996.0277","article-title":"Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.","volume":"63","author":"Chang","year":"1996","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"R14-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2013.11.019","article-title":"Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.","volume":"132","author":"Diaz","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"R15-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1159\/000345864","article-title":"Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.","volume":"75","author":"Papoutsis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"R16-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.08.016","article-title":"Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment.","volume":"165","author":"Kliemann","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"R17-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.11.015","article-title":"Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.","volume":"105","author":"Ayhan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R18-6-20210126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.05.027","article-title":"Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management.","volume":"107","author":"Chen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000079","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,14]],"date-time":"2021-05-14T01:50:36Z","timestamp":1620957036000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00128360-201504000-00006"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,4]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lgt.0000000000000079","relation":{},"ISSN":["1089-2591"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1089-2591","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,4]]}}}