{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,18]],"date-time":"2026-03-18T21:27:40Z","timestamp":1773869260896,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,7]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/mou.0b013e32835480b2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,21]],"date-time":"2012-05-21T16:25:09Z","timestamp":1337617509000},"page":"287-291","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["Complications of vaginal mesh surgery"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Christopher J.","family":"Chermansky","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J. Christian","family":"Winters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1278","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96","article-title":"Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050.","volume":"114","author":"Wu","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R2-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0457-y","article-title":"The age distribution, rates, and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the U.S.","volume":"19","author":"Shah","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"R3-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816a2489","article-title":"Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial.","volume":"111","author":"Nguyen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R4-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31804b184c","article-title":"Biologic grafts and synthetic meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery.","volume":"50","author":"Chen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R5-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1542-9","article-title":"Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review.","volume":"22","author":"Maher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R6-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1384-5","article-title":"Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review.","volume":"22","author":"Abed","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R7-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01902378","article-title":"An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence.","volume":"7","author":"Ulmsten","year":"1996","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"R8-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2066","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0912658","article-title":"Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.","volume":"362","author":"Richter","year":"2010","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R9-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.011","article-title":"Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study.","volume":"205","author":"Brubaker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R10-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182479283","article-title":"Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants.","volume":"119","author":"Nguyen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1535-8","article-title":"Comparison of late complications of retropubic and transobturator slings in stress urinary incontinence.","volume":"23","author":"Petri","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R12-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20980","article-title":"Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.","volume":"30","author":"Ogah","year":"2011","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"R13-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1906","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.02.2369","article-title":"Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.","volume":"183","author":"Dmochowski","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R16-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.21036","article-title":"An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery.","volume":"30","author":"Haylen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"R17-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822ada95","article-title":"Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure.","volume":"118","author":"Withagen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1270-6","article-title":"Age and sexual activity are risk factors for mesh exposure following transvaginal mesh repair.","volume":"22","author":"Kaufman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R19-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181cbca4d","article-title":"Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management.","volume":"115","author":"Feiner","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R20-7-20210206","first-page":"529","article-title":"Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantation: evidence of mesh contraction or folding Int Urogynecol","volume":"22","author":"Svabik","year":"2011","journal-title":"J"},{"key":"R21-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1826","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1009521","article-title":"Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.","volume":"363","author":"Altman","year":"2011","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R22-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial.","volume":"204","author":"Maher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R23-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.08.003","article-title":"One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse.","volume":"206","author":"Sokol","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R24-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1578-x","article-title":"A prospective comparison of two commercial mesh kits in the management of anterior vaginal prolapse.","volume":"23","author":"Feiner","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R25-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1536-7","article-title":"Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and valut prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments.","volume":"23","author":"Moore","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"R26-7-20210206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1581-2","article-title":"Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication - UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.","volume":"23","author":"Murphy","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/MOU.0b013e32835480b2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,14]],"date-time":"2021-05-14T04:08:58Z","timestamp":1620965338000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00042307-201207000-00007"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,7]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/mou.0b013e32835480b2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0963-0643"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0963-0643","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,7]]}}}