{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T23:43:57Z","timestamp":1787010237461,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/ogx.0000000000000057","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,16]],"date-time":"2014-04-16T12:00:15Z","timestamp":1397649615000},"page":"209-217","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Evidence-Based Guidelines in Labor Management"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"Katherine Rodewald","family":"Millen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kelly","family":"Kuo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lulu","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kimberly","family":"Gecsi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.041","article-title":"Putting the M back in maternal-fetal medicine.","volume":"208","author":"DAlton","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R2-15-20210212","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2011.","volume":"62","author":"Martin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"pt 1","key":"R3-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000233154.62729.24","article-title":"Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery.","volume":"108","author":"Deneux-Tharaux","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R6-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.04.016","article-title":"Labor in 2013: the new frontier.","volume":"209","author":"Cahill","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R7-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2002.046","article-title":"Maternal obesity not maternal glucose values correlates best with high rates of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes.","volume":"30","author":"Schaefer-Graf","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"R8-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182704880","article-title":"Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.","volume":"120","author":"Spong","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R9-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-195512000-00001","article-title":"Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis.","volume":"6","author":"Friedman","year":"1955","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R10-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-195612000-00007","article-title":"Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis.","volume":"8","author":"Friedman","year":"1956","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127142","article-title":"Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women.","volume":"187","author":"Zhang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R12-15-20210212","first-page":"448","article-title":"Transition from latent to active labor.","volume":"68","author":"Peisner","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R13-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","article-title":"Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.","volume":"116","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R15-15-20210212","first-page":"1120","article-title":"The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention.","volume":"108","author":"Holmes","year":"2001","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R16-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3565(25)23395-X","article-title":"A quantitative study of the action of synthetic oxytocin on the pregnant human uterus.","volume":"121","author":"Caldeyro-Barcia","year":"1957","journal-title":"J Pharmacol Exp Ther"},{"key":"R17-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-198609000-00003","article-title":"Uterine contraction pressures with oxytocin inductionaugmentation.","volume":"68","author":"Hauth","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-15-20210212","first-page":"550","article-title":"Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum.","volume":"98","author":"Rouse","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R19-15-20210212","first-page":"323","article-title":"Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours.","volume":"93","author":"Rouse","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R20-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1109","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818b46a2","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in the setting of active phase arrest of labor.","volume":"112","author":"Henry","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R21-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2009.08.004","article-title":"Active labor duration and dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset: a systematic review.","volume":"55","author":"Neal","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"R22-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2010.00443.x","article-title":"Variability in rate of cervical dilation in nulliparous women at term.","volume":"38","author":"Incerti","year":"2011","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R23-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1159\/000049403","article-title":"Labor in the grand multipara.","volume":"53","author":"Lyrenas","year":"2002","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"R24-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.2.5655.477","article-title":"Prevention of prolonged labour.","volume":"2","author":"ODriscoll","year":"1969","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"R25-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2005.01.004","article-title":"Active management of labor.","volume":"32","author":"Pates","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"R26-15-20210212","first-page":"CD004907","article-title":"Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women.","volume":"9","author":"Brown","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R28-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f680b2","article-title":"Committee opinion no. 466: ethical considerations for performing gynecologic surgery in low-resource settings abroad.","volume":"116","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R30-15-20210212","first-page":"933","article-title":"How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes Am J Obstet Gynecol.","volume":"191","author":"Cheng","year":"2004","journal-title":""},{"key":"R31-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.021","article-title":"Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes.","volume":"196","author":"Cheng","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R32-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105197","article-title":"Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. The PEOPLE (Pushing Early or Pushing Late with Epidural) Study Group.","volume":"182","author":"Fraser","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R33-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.002","article-title":"When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia.","volume":"201","author":"Le Ray","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R34-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.005","article-title":"Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor.","volume":"197","author":"Sung","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R36-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2013.90","article-title":"Changes in delivery methods at specialty care hospitals in the United States between 2006 and 2010.","volume":"33","author":"Danilack","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"R37-15-20210212","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2006.","volume":"57","author":"Martin","year":"2009","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"pt 1","key":"R38-15-20210212","first-page":"671","article-title":"Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol.","volume":"96","author":"Rouse","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R39-15-20210212","first-page":"705","article-title":"When has an induction failed Obstet Gynecol.","volume":"105","author":"Simon","year":"2005","journal-title":""},{"issue":"pt 1","key":"R40-15-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318207887a","article-title":"Failed labor induction: toward an objective diagnosis.","volume":"117","author":"Rouse","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Obstetrical &amp; Gynecological Survey"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000057","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,2]],"date-time":"2025-05-02T07:51:33Z","timestamp":1746172293000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00006254-201404000-00015"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ogx.0000000000000057","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-7828"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-7828","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]}}}