{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,28]],"date-time":"2026-10-28T02:25:49Z","timestamp":1793154349187,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,2]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/ogx.0b013e3181d0fe5d","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,1,26]],"date-time":"2010-01-26T02:11:31Z","timestamp":1264471891000},"page":"132-140","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Home Versus Hospital Birth\u2014Process and Outcome"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"65","author":[{"given":"Joseph R.","family":"Wax","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael G.","family":"Pinette","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angelina","family":"Cartin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R7-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1523-536X.2003.00212.x","article-title":"Swedish women\u2019s interest in home birth and in-hospital birth centre care.","volume":"30","author":"Hildingsson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R8-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0730-7659.2004.0271.x","article-title":"Does a pregnant woman\u2019s intended place of birth influence her attitudes toward and occurrence of obstetric interventions?","volume":"31","author":"vanderHulst","year":"2004","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R9-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.313.7068.1313","article-title":"Home versus hospital deliveries: follow up study of matched pairs for procedure and outcome.","volume":"313","author":"Ackermann-Liebrich","year":"1996","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R10-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.12968\/bjom.1997.5.4.208","article-title":"Women\u2019s memories of home-birth 3\u20135 years on.","volume":"5","author":"Ogden","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Midwifery"},{"key":"R11-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610120113274","article-title":"A psychosocial analysis of women planning birth outside hospital.","volume":"22","author":"Neuhaus","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R12-23-20210212","first-page":"373","article-title":"Planned and unplanned home births and hospital births in Calgary, Alberta, 1984\u20131987.","volume":"104","author":"Abernathy","year":"1989","journal-title":"Public Health Rep"},{"key":"R13-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1416","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.330.7505.1416","article-title":"Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.","volume":"330","author":"Johnson","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R14-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802199903","article-title":"Outcomes of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study.","volume":"87","author":"Lindgren","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R15-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2005.10.012","article-title":"Satisfaction with planned place of birth among midwifery clients in British Columbia.","volume":"51","author":"Janssen","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"R16-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.1990.tb126317.x","article-title":"Planned homebirths in south Australia 1976\u20131987.","volume":"153","author":"Crotty","year":"1990","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"R17-23-20210212","first-page":"315","article-title":"Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia.","volume":"166","author":"Janssen","year":"2002","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"R18-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/0266-6138(94)90042-6","article-title":"A matched cohort study of planned home and hospital births in Western Australia 1981\u20131987.","volume":"10","author":"Woodcock","year":"1994","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"R19-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1478","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.291.6507.1478","article-title":"Five year prospective survey of risk of booking for a home birth in Essex.","volume":"219","author":"Shearer","year":"1985","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R20-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.081869","article-title":"Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.","volume":"181","author":"Janssen","year":"2009","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"R21-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2009.00322.x","article-title":"Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003\u20132006: a retrospective cohort study.","volume":"36","author":"Hutton","year":"2009","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R22-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.82.3.450","article-title":"The safety of home birth: the farm study.","volume":"82","author":"Durand","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"R23-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.313.7068.1309","article-title":"Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in the Netherlands.","volume":"313","author":"Wiegars","year":"1996","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R24-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1984.tb00771.x","article-title":"Outcomes of a rural Sonoma county home birth practice: 1976\u20131982.","volume":"11","author":"Koehler","year":"1984","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R25-23-20210212","first-page":"128","article-title":"Patient selection and outcomes for out-of-hospital births in one family practice.","volume":"31","author":"Acheson","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Fam Pract"},{"key":"R26-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819c82cc","article-title":"The prognosis for spontaneous labor in women with uncomplicated term pregnancies. Implications for cesarean delivery on maternal request.","volume":"113","author":"Worley","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R27-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.73.6.641","article-title":"Four years\u2019 experience with home birth by licensed midwives in Arizona.","volume":"73","author":"Sullivan","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"R28-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.312.7033.753","article-title":"Should there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom?","volume":"312","author":"Dowswell","year":"1996","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R29-23-20210212","first-page":"CD000352","article-title":"Home versus hospital birth.","author":"Olsen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R30-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02103.x","article-title":"Why women do not accept randomization for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in the Netherlands.","volume":"116","author":"Hendrix","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R31-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2741","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1980.03310240033019","article-title":"Home delivery and neonatal mortality in North Carolina.","volume":"244","author":"Burnett","year":"1980","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R32-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1578","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1985.03350350072023","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes in planned v. unplanned out-of-hospital births in Kentucky.","volume":"253","author":"Hinds","year":"1985","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R33-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1306","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.313.7068.1306","article-title":"Collaborative survey of perinatal loss in planned and unplanned home births.","volume":"313","year":"1996","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R34-23-20210212","first-page":"253","article-title":"Outcomes of planned home births in Washington State: 1989\u20131996.","volume":"100","author":"Pang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R35-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1177","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02175.x","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births.","volume":"116","author":"de Jonge","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R39-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"I5","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03404260","article-title":"Comparison of midwifery care to medical care in hospitals in the Quebec pilot study: clinical indicators.","volume":"91","author":"Fraser","year":"2000","journal-title":"Can J Public Health"},{"key":"R40-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.87.3.344","article-title":"Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.","volume":"87","author":"Rosenblatt","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"R41-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1388","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00338.x","article-title":"Do maternity care provider groups have different attitudes toward birth?","volume":"111","author":"Reime","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R42-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2007.00160.x","article-title":"Outcomes of planned hospital birth attended by midwives compared with physicians in British Columbia.","volume":"34","author":"Janssen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R43-23-20210212","first-page":"CD004667","article-title":"Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women.","author":"Hatem","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R44-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.317.7155.384","article-title":"Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study.","volume":"317","author":"Bastian","year":"1998","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R45-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01669.x","article-title":"An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003.","volume":"115","author":"Mori","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R46-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02147.x","article-title":"Estimating intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births: when the \u2018best\u2019 available data are not good enough.","volume":"116","author":"Gyte","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R47-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2008.00227.x","article-title":"Economic implications of home births and birth centers: a structured review.","volume":"35","author":"Henderson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"R48-23-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1335","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a11b99","article-title":"Evidence-based compared with reality-based medicine in obstetrics.","volume":"113","author":"Vintzileos","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1097\/OGX.0b013e3181d0fe5d","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T18:13:07Z","timestamp":1786039987000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006254-201002000-00023"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,2]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ogx.0b013e3181d0fe5d","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-7828"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-7828","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,2]]}}}