{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T09:45:30Z","timestamp":1791971130189,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":91,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"DOI":"10.1097\/ogx.0b013e31826a5c6f","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,18]],"date-time":"2012-09-18T09:07:12Z","timestamp":1347959232000},"page":"554-565","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Antenatal Surveillance of Fetal Growth Restriction"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"67","author":[{"given":"Jennifer L.","family":"Thompson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeffrey A.","family":"Kuller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eleanor H.","family":"Rhee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R2-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.149","article-title":". Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses.","volume":"22","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R3-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1234","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199904223401603","article-title":". Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants.","volume":"340","author":"McIntire","year":"1999","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R4-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70513-8","article-title":". Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. The Vermont Oxford Network.","volume":"182","author":"Bernstein","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R5-16-20210212","first-page":"142","article-title":"Evaluation of neonates born with intrauterine growth retardation: review and practice guidelines.","volume":"18","author":"Alkalay","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"R6-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-3356(21)00521-5","article-title":"Problems of the small-for-dates baby.","volume":"11","author":"Jones","year":"1984","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R7-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2459","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2011.1823","article-title":"","volume":"306","year":"2011","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R8-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38629.587639.7C","article-title":". Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study.","volume":"331","author":"Gardosi","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R9-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b72ebe","article-title":". Diverse placental pathologies as the main causes of fetal death.","volume":"114","author":"Korteweg","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R10-16-20210212","first-page":"490","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction.","volume":"99","author":"Resnik","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"640715","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/640715","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction.","volume":"2011","author":"Bamfo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Pregnancy"},{"key":"R12-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.1998.770611.x","article-title":"Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases.","volume":"77","author":"Jahn","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"R14-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07894.x","article-title":". Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height.","volume":"93","author":"Persson","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R15-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03634.x","article-title":". Measurement of fundal height as a screening test for fetal growth retardation.","volume":"89","author":"Rosenberg","year":"1982","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R16-16-20210212","first-page":"77","article-title":"Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population.","volume":"16","author":"Kean","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"R17-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03360.x","article-title":". The effect of maternal bladder volume on fundal height measurements.","volume":"96","author":"Engstrom","year":"1989","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R18-16-20210212","first-page":"591","article-title":"Symphysis-fundus height and pregnancy characteristics in ultrasound-dated pregnancies.","volume":"94","author":"Mongelli","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R19-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1995.tb01859.x","article-title":"Screening for the small fetus: a study of the relative efficacies of ultrasound biometry and symphysiofundal height.","volume":"35","author":"Harding","year":"1995","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R20-16-20210212","first-page":"631","article-title":". Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus.","volume":"69","author":"Brown","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R21-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03319.x","article-title":". A comparison of fetal abdominal circumference measurements and Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of small-for-dates babies and fetal compromise.","volume":"96","author":"Chambers","year":"1989","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R22-16-20210212","first-page":"1030","article-title":"TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, et al..","volume":"80","year":"1992","journal-title":"Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R23-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.13060415.x","article-title":"Single and serial estimates of amniotic fluid volume and umbilical artery resistance in the prediction of intrauterine growth restriction.","volume":"13","author":"Owen","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R24-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1994.04010034.x","article-title":"Fetal biometry at 14-40 weeks gestation.","volume":"4","author":"Snijders","year":"1994","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R25-16-20210212","first-page":"33","article-title":". Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation.","volume":"67","author":"Warsof","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R26-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870140105","article-title":". Routine obstetric ultrasound: effectiveness of cross-sectional screening for fetal growth retardation.","volume":"14","author":"Ferrazzi","year":"1986","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"R27-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70347-2","article-title":". Receiver-operator characteristic curves for the ultrasonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in low-risk pregnancies.","volume":"174","author":"David","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R28-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/S0033-8389(22)01218-0","article-title":"Sonographic estimation of fetal age and weight.","volume":"28","author":"Hadlock","year":"1990","journal-title":"Radiol Clin North Am"},{"key":"R29-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999434","article-title":". Sonographic estimates of fetal weight in the intrauterine growth retardation population.","volume":"7","author":"Guidetti","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R30-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1097\/00001648-199309000-00014","article-title":". alpha-Fetoprotein: a biomarker for pregnancy outcome.","volume":"4","author":"Waller","year":"1993","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"R31-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1762","DOI":"10.1210\/jcem.87.4.8430","article-title":". Early pregnancy levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein a and the risk of intrauterine growth restriction, premature birth, preeclampsia, and stillbirth.","volume":"87","author":"Smith","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Clin Endocrinol Metab"},{"key":"R32-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5165","article-title":". First-trimester biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of small-for-gestational age fetuses.","volume":"31","author":"Spencer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R33-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000191302.79560.d8","article-title":". Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and alpha-fetoprotein and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.","volume":"107","author":"Smith","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R34-16-20210212","first-page":"239","article-title":"AA, Fetal growth restrictionfrom observation to intervention.","volume":"38","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"R35-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.13020086.x","article-title":". Fetal growth rate and adverse perinatal events.","volume":"13","author":"de Jong","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R36-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2003.10.011","article-title":"Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control.","volume":"28","author":"Deter","year":"2004","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"R37-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2003.12.002","article-title":"Customized fetal growth standards: rationale and clinical application.","volume":"28","author":"Gardosi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"R38-16-20210212","first-page":"1397","article-title":"JA, Zhang X, Cnattingius S, et al..","volume":"115","year":"2008","journal-title":"Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter BJOG"},{"key":"R39-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90008-4","article-title":"A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results.","volume":"143","author":"Freeman","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R40-16-20210212","first-page":"566","article-title":". Improved outcome of twice weekly nonstress testing.","volume":"67","author":"Boehm","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R41-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70114-6","article-title":". Fetal death after normal biophysical profile score: An eighteen-year experience.","volume":"181","author":"Dayal","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R43-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8545(05)70099-1","article-title":"Fetal biophysical profile.","volume":"26","author":"Manning","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"R44-16-20210212","first-page":"357","article-title":". Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.","volume":"70","author":"Baskett","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R45-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(84)90359-4","article-title":". Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. I. The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volumes to perinatal outcome.","volume":"150","author":"Chamberlain","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R46-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70339-6","article-title":". Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.","volume":"170","author":"Nageotte","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R47-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1223284","article-title":". Predicting perinatal mortality in preterm intrauterine growth restriction.","volume":"26","author":"Scifres","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"R49-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90466-2","article-title":"Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis.","volume":"172","author":"Alfirevic","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R50-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.989","article-title":"Doppler application in the delivery timing of the preterm growth-restricted fetus: another step in the right direction.","volume":"23","author":"Baschat","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R51-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.022","article-title":"Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction.","volume":"206","author":"Berkley","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R52-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"936","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)92818-Z","article-title":". Comparison of umbilical-artery velocimetry and cardiotocography for surveillance of small-for-gestational-age fetuses.","volume":"340","author":"Almstrom","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R53-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11494.x","article-title":"Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus umbilical artery Doppler in the management of small for gestational age fetuses.","volume":"104","author":"Haley","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R55-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1299","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)92490-7","article-title":"Randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy.","volume":"340","author":"Davies","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R56-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90585-F","article-title":"JA, The current status of maternal and fetal blood flow velocimetry.","volume":"164","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R57-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.019","article-title":". Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy.","volume":"192","author":"Acharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R58-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70505-9","article-title":"Umbilical artery Doppler screening for detection of the small fetus in need of antepartum surveillance.","volume":"182","author":"Baschat","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R59-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1991.01030192.x","article-title":". The clinical significance of absent or reverse end-diastolic flow in the fetal aorta and umbilical artery.","volume":"1","author":"Mandruzzato","year":"1991","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R60-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1664","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(94)90457-X","article-title":". Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery.","volume":"344","author":"Karsdorp","year":"1994","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R61-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2002.00627.x","article-title":". Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus.","volume":"19","author":"Ferrazzi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R62-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management.","volume":"204","author":"Figueras","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R63-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1159\/000319800","article-title":". Differences in neonatal outcome in fetuses with absent versus reverse end-diastolic flow in umbilical artery Doppler.","volume":"28","author":"Vasconcelos","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"R64-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75","article-title":". Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction.","volume":"109","author":"Baschat","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R65-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.213.3.r99dc08681","article-title":". Prediction of perinatal outcome in fetuses suspected to have intrauterine growth restriction: Doppler US study of fetal cerebral, renal, and umbilical arteries.","volume":"213","author":"Fong","year":"1999","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R66-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1240","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000187540.37795.3a","article-title":". Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses.","volume":"106","author":"Cosmi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R67-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00079.x","article-title":". Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler.","volume":"15","author":"Hershkovitz","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R68-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-5629(93)90120-D","article-title":". Flow velocity waveforms in the ductus venosus, umbilical vein and inferior vena cava in normal human fetuses at 12-15 weeks of gestation.","volume":"19","author":"Huisman","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"R69-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00387.x","article-title":". Ductus venosus studies in fetuses at high risk for chromosomal or heart abnormalities: relationship with nuchal translucency measurement and fetal outcome.","volume":"17","author":"Bilardo","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R70-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1914","article-title":". Qualitative venous Doppler flow waveform analysis in preterm intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses with ARED flow in the umbilical arterycorrelation with short-term outcome.","volume":"25","author":"Schwarze","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R71-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1976","article-title":". Uterine artery Doppler at 11-14 weeks of gestation to screen for hypertensive disorders and associated complications in an unselected population.","volume":"26","author":"Gomez","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R72-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(86)90340-6","article-title":". Development of uterine artery compliance in pregnancy as detected by Doppler ultrasound.","volume":"155","author":"Schulman","year":"1986","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R73-16-20210212","first-page":"559","article-title":". One-stage screening for pregnancy complications by color Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries at 23 weeks gestation.","volume":"96","author":"Albaiges","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R74-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11690.x","article-title":". How useful is uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal death An overview.","volume":"107","author":"Chien","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R75-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00594.x","article-title":". Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11-14 weeks of gestation.","volume":"18","author":"Martin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R76-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e32809bd964","article-title":"Uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome.","volume":"19","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2007","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R77-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-198606000-00022","article-title":". Blood flow velocity waveforms in the descending fetal aorta: comparison between normal and growth-retarded pregnancies.","volume":"67","author":"Tonge","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R78-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.294.6563.13","article-title":". Doppler studies in the growth retarded fetus and prediction of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis, haemorrhage, and neonatal morbidity.","volume":"294","author":"Hackett","year":"1987","journal-title":"Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)"},{"key":"R79-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-198912000-00011","article-title":"Noninvasive assessment of fetal aortic blood flow in normal and abnormal pregnancies.","volume":"32","author":"Jouppila","year":"1989","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R80-16-20210212","first-page":"322","article-title":". Blood flow in the fetal descending aorta.","volume":"11","author":"Marsal","year":"1987","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"R81-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1118","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90529-5","article-title":". Relation of fetal hypoxia in growth retardation to mean blood velocity in the fetal aorta.","volume":"2","author":"Soothill","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R82-16-20210212","first-page":"370","article-title":"Fetal renal artery velocity waveforms and amniotic fluid volume in growth-retarded and post-term fetuses.","volume":"77","author":"Arduini","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R83-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1502","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90913-7","article-title":"Duplex Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation of the fetal renal artery in normal and abnormal fetuses.","volume":"161","author":"Veille","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R84-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1990.18.3.165","article-title":"Normal values of pulsatility index from fetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses.","volume":"18","author":"Arduini","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"R85-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00493.x","article-title":". Doppler studies on the fetal renal artery in the severely growth-restricted fetus.","volume":"18","author":"Stigter","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R86-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9011","article-title":". Duration of persistent abnormal ductus venosus flow and its impact on perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction.","volume":"38","author":"Turan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R87-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5386","article-title":". Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction.","volume":"32","author":"Turan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R88-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00591.x","article-title":"The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens.","volume":"18","author":"Baschat","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R89-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"834","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117356","article-title":". Early and persistent reduction in umbilical vein blood flow in the growth-restricted fetus: a longitudinal study.","volume":"185","author":"Rigano","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R90-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70305-8","article-title":"The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s.","volume":"174","author":"Miller","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R92-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70285-3","article-title":". Absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: risk of neonatal morbidity and brain damage.","volume":"170","author":"Valcamonico","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R93-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-0328(02)02514-4","article-title":"A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation.","volume":"110","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R95-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":". Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT).","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R96-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115865","article-title":". Impairment of growth in fetuses destined to deliver preterm.","volume":"185","author":"Bukowski","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R97-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2004.10.015","article-title":"Prematurity and fetal growth restriction.","volume":"81","author":"Gardosi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"R98-16-20210212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90314-H","article-title":". Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values.","volume":"165","author":"Vintzileos","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00006254-201209000-00016","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,25]],"date-time":"2023-06-25T21:16:15Z","timestamp":1687727775000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00006254-201209000-00016"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"references-count":91,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ogx.0b013e31826a5c6f","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-7828"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-7828","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]}}}