{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T11:17:00Z","timestamp":1774955820749,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]],"date-time":"2013-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1364774400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]],"date-time":"2013-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1364774400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["OVS"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Consistent astigmatism correction with implantation of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) requires accurate preoperative keratometry. This article compares corneal astigmatism determined by an autokeratometer (Topcon KR\u20107100) and a partial coherence interferometry keratometer (IOLMaster 500) and considers if any discrepancy ultimately alters in final cylindrical power of the toric IOL for implantation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Keratometry of 235 eyes was performed using both instruments. Corneal astigmatism was transformed into vector components\n                      <jats:italic>J<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sub>0<\/jats:sub>\n                      and\n                      <jats:italic>J<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sub>45<\/jats:sub>\n                      and cylindrical power at the IOL plane calculated. Comparisons were made using paired\n                      <jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>\n                      test and correlation and Bland\u2010Altman analyses.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Although interinstrument differences for\n                      <jats:italic>J<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sub>0<\/jats:sub>\n                      (p = 0.013),\n                      <jats:italic>J<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sub>45<\/jats:sub>\n                      (p = 0.012), and toric IOL cylindrical power (p &lt; 0.001) were statistically significant, a high correlation for these (\n                      <jats:italic>R<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 0.96, 0.90, and 0.90, respectively) was observed. IOLMaster tended to overestimate corneal astigmatism by 0.13 (\u00b10.31) diopters and toric IOL cylinder by 0.11 (\u00b10.18) diopters. Difference in calculated toric IOL cylindrical power correlated poorly with corneal curvature (\n                      <jats:italic>R<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 0.007) and astigmatism (\n                      <jats:italic>R<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = \u22120.004).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The two keratometers were generally concordant in measuring corneal astigmatism. However, the resultant choice of toric IOL cylinder power differed appreciably in 40% of eyes examined. Therefore, postoperative visual outcome with toric IOL implantation may be optimized by a thorough analysis of biometry data before IOL selection, paying special attention to any difference in corneal astigmatism as measured by more than one instrument.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/opx.0b013e318287345b","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,22]],"date-time":"2013-02-22T05:00:39Z","timestamp":1361509239000},"page":"385-391","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Comparison of Automated and Partial Coherence Keratometry and Resulting Choice of Toric IOL"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"90","author":[{"given":"Jit B.","family":"Ale Magar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Moreton Eye Group Redcliffe Queensland Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Frank","family":"Cunningham","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Moreton Eye Group Redcliffe Queensland Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Garry","family":"Brian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Dunedin School of Medicine University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2006.00774.x","article-title":"Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster","volume":"85","author":"Olsen T","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(00)00699-4","article-title":"Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry","volume":"27","author":"Findl O","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.02.035","article-title":"Aiming for emmetropia after cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study","volume":"38","author":"Behndig A","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1935","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.06.036","article-title":"Factors related to the degree of success in achieving target refraction in cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study","volume":"34","author":"Kugelberg M","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","first-page":"360","article-title":"Biometry of 7500 cataractous eyes","volume":"90","author":"Hoffer KJ","year":"1980","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.126.8.1111","article-title":"Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999\u20132004","volume":"126","author":"Vitale S","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-9071.2011.02635.x","article-title":"High prevalence of astigmatism in the 40\u2010 to 64\u2010year\u2010old population of Shahroud, Iran","volume":"40","author":"Hashemi H","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-198903000-00003","article-title":"Refractive errors induced by displacement of intraocular lenses within the pseudophakic eye","volume":"66","author":"Atchison DA","year":"1989","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-004-1035-3","article-title":"Correction of preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery: comparison between the effects of opposite clear corneal incisions and a single clear corneal incision","volume":"243","author":"Ben Simon GJ","year":"2005","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","first-page":"117","article-title":"Relaxing incision for control of postoperative astigmatism following keratoplasty","volume":"11","author":"Troutman RC","year":"1980","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2261","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2005.08.046","article-title":"Limbal relaxing incisions versus on\u2010axis incisions to reduce corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery","volume":"31","author":"Kaufmann C","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.04.043","article-title":"Comparison of toric intraocular lenses and peripheral corneal relaxing incisions to treat astigmatism during cataract surgery","volume":"36","author":"Mingo\u2010Botin D","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.3126\/nepjoph.v4i1.5848","article-title":"Refractive and visual outcome of toric intraocular lens implantation following cataract surgery","volume":"4","author":"Ale JB","year":"2012","journal-title":"Nepal J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.05.031","article-title":"Astigmatism management in cataract surgery with the AcrySof toric intraocular lens","volume":"34","author":"Bauer NJ","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(00)00317-5","article-title":"Astigmatism correction with a foldable toric intraocular lens in cataract patients","volume":"26","author":"Ruhswurm I","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)01035-5","article-title":"Toric intraocular lens implantation: 100 consecutive cases","volume":"28","author":"Till JS","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2010.00515.x","article-title":"Surgical correction of astigmatism during cataract surgery","volume":"93","author":"Buckhurst PJ","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(97)80318-5","article-title":"Comparison of portable automated keratometry and manual keratometry for IOL calculation","volume":"23","author":"Manning CA","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(03)00583-2","article-title":"Reliability of the IOLMaster in measuring corneal power changes after photorefractive keratectomy","volume":"30","author":"Rosa N","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2009.04.028","article-title":"Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices","volume":"148","author":"Shirayama M","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80530-5","article-title":"Comparison of three keratometry instruments","volume":"21","author":"Tennen DG","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1961","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)01214-7","article-title":"Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability","volume":"27","author":"Vogel A","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.01.044","article-title":"Postoperative aphakia in modern cataract surgery: part 2: detailed analysis of the cause of aphakia and the visual outcome","volume":"30","author":"Lundstrom M","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.08.031","article-title":"Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements","volume":"143","author":"Elbaz U","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ico.0000214203.84081.ec","article-title":"An evaluation of keratometry in 6\u2010year\u2010old children","volume":"25","author":"Huynh SC","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1177\/112067210601600303","article-title":"Reproducibility of keratometric measurements decreases with time after blinking","volume":"16","author":"Erdelyi B","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1694","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.03.047","article-title":"Differences in corneal astigmatism between partial coherence interferometry biometry and automated keratometry and relation to topographic pattern","volume":"37","author":"Park JH","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.050","article-title":"Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values","volume":"37","author":"Symes RJ","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-199706000-00019","article-title":"Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error","volume":"74","author":"Thibos LN","year":"1997","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-196508000-00003","article-title":"Astigmatism and optometric vectors","volume":"42","author":"Gartner WF","year":"1965","journal-title":"Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_32_1","first-page":"17","article-title":"Automatic retinoscopy: the Humphrey vision analyser","volume":"173","author":"Humphrey W","year":"1977","journal-title":"Optician"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(00)00797-5","article-title":"Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery","volume":"27","author":"Thibos LN","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","article-title":"Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement","volume":"1","author":"Bland JM","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1967","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visres.2005.01.022","article-title":"Noticeable, troublesome and objectionable limits of blur","volume":"45","author":"Atchison DA","year":"2005","journal-title":"Vision Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visres.2009.07.009","article-title":"Blur limits for defocus, astigmatism and trefoil","volume":"49","author":"Atchison DA","year":"2009","journal-title":"Vision Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2009.00637.x","article-title":"Limits of spherical blur determined with an adaptive optics mirror","volume":"29","author":"Atchison DA","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-199504000-00008","article-title":"Spherocylindrical refractive errors and visual acuity","volume":"72","author":"Raasch TW","year":"1995","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_39_1","first-page":"549","article-title":"Subjective blur limits for cylinder","volume":"87","author":"Guo H","year":"2010","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"}],"container-title":["Optometry and Vision Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318287345b","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318287345b","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318287345b","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T10:33:26Z","timestamp":1774953206000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318287345b"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318287345b"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/opx.0b013e318287345b","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-5488","1538-9235"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-5488","type":"print"},{"value":"1538-9235","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]}}}