{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,23]],"date-time":"2024-06-23T22:40:10Z","timestamp":1719182410352},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Pediatr Emer Care"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"abstract":"Objective<\/jats:title>Many indications justifiably drive the pediatrician to request a urine sample in order to assess the health status of the incontinent baby or infant. Urine collection by means of an adhesive perineal bag is the most widely used in children who do not control urine emission, despite its inaccurate reflection of bacteriuria. We suggest a novel technique to immediately visualize the micturition event upon occurrence, in attempt to shorten waiting times and exhausting checking and rechecking opaque diapers in order to determine whether the desired sample has finally been delivered.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Methods<\/jats:title>The perineal urine collection bag is pulled through a vertical slit created in the front of the disposable diaper. The bag is now visible at all times.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Results<\/jats:title>In general, waiting times appear shortened since the implementation of this practice. Since the adoption of this technique at a number of our clinics, we have not experienced bag displacement as was previously experienced. Forgoing the need to manipulate the diaper and repeatedly awakening irritable infants was gladly welcomed by parents.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Conclusions<\/jats:title>Widespread adoption of the diaper slit technique seems a promising procedure enhancing comfort and facilitating the process of obtaining a urine sample in the incontinent child. Assumptions that this procedure actually shortens waiting times and raises the success rates of sample retrieval remain to be proven by formal comparative trials.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/pec.0000000000001160","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,2]],"date-time":"2017-05-02T15:15:30Z","timestamp":1493738130000},"page":"446-448","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Diaper Slit Perineal Bag Urine Sampling"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Sody A.","family":"Naimer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"bib1-20231023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1197\/aemj.9.12.1379","article-title":"Patient satisfaction in the emergency department\u2014a survey of pediatric patients and their parents","volume":"9","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acad Emerg Med"},{"key":"bib2-20231023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"832","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1553-2712.2008.00224.x","article-title":"Pediatric emergency department overcrowding and impact on patient flow outcomes","volume":"15","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acad Emerg Med"},{"key":"bib3-20231023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1159\/000273068","article-title":"Evaluation of urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children","volume":"19","year":"2010","journal-title":"Med Princ Pract"},{"key":"bib4-20231023","first-page":"149","article-title":"Urinary tract infection in infants: use of urine specimens obtained by suprapubic bladder aspiration in order to determine the reliability of culture specimen of urine collected in perineal bag","volume":"45","year":"1996","journal-title":"An Esp Pediatr"},{"key":"bib5-20231023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.1976.tb10222.x","article-title":"Comparison of sterile bag, clean catch and suprapubic aspiration in the diagnosis of urinary infection in early childhood","volume":"48","year":"1976","journal-title":"Br J Urol"},{"key":"bib6-20231023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1224","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2009-3284","article-title":"Comparison of pain during two methods of urine collection in preterm infants","volume":"125","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"bib7-20231023","first-page":"80","article-title":"Catch or bag your specimen?","volume":"85","year":"1989","journal-title":"Nurs Times"},{"key":"bib8-20231023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1179\/146532805X23326","article-title":"Comparison of urine contamination rates using three different methods of collection: clean-catch, cotton wool pad and urine bag","volume":"25","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Trop Paediatr"},{"key":"bib9-20231023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1067\/mpd.2000.107466","article-title":"Urine culture from bag specimens in young children: are the risks too high?","volume":"137","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"issue":"1 spec no.","key":"bib10-20231023","first-page":"85","article-title":"A method for urine collection in infants","volume":"69","year":"1993","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child"}],"container-title":["Pediatric Emergency Care"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00006565-201706000-00018","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,23]],"date-time":"2024-06-23T22:07:02Z","timestamp":1719180422000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00006565-201706000-00018"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/pec.0000000000001160","relation":{},"ISSN":["1535-1815","0749-5161"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1535-1815","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0749-5161","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}}}