{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,22]],"date-time":"2025-08-22T05:06:20Z","timestamp":1755839180472,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The objective of this study was to compare the treatment results of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with abdominal wall lifting (AWL+LP, 6\u2009mm\u2009Hg) versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (SP, 12\u2009mm\u2009Hg) during laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), using propensity score matching (PSM).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A retrospective analysis was made of 362 patients, 123 in the AWL+LP group and 239 in the SP group, who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD from January 2010 to December 2017. Perioperative and prognostic outcomes were compared after PSM with 1:1 match.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>After PSM, 107 matched pairs were obtained. Compared with the SP group at 30 and 60 minutes after pneumoperitoneal initiation, the AWL+LP group showed significantly lower end-tidal carbon dioxide value (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>&lt;0.001, &lt;0.001, respectively), lower partial pressure of carbon dioxide value (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>&lt;0.001, 0.016, respectively) and significantly higher pH value (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>&lt;0.001, &lt;0.001, respectively). However, postoperative shoulder pain, abdominal pain, and arrhythmia in the AWL+LP group were less than those in SP group (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>=0.01, 0.017, 0.005, respectively). There was no significant difference in operative time (106.54\u00b127.80 vs. 107.38\u00b124.78\u2009min), blood loss [15\u2009mL (interquartile range: 12.5 to 20\u2009mL) vs.15\u2009mL (interquartile range: 10 to 20\u2009mL)], length of stay (4 vs. 4\u2009d), the wound ecchymosis [2 (1.87%) vs. 3 (2.80%)] and rates of recurrence [8 (7.48%) vs. 5 (4.67%)] between AWL+LP group and SP group.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>AWL+LP resulted in comparable perioperative and prognostic outcomes with less impact on changes in cardiorespiratory function compared with SP approaches of laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/sle.0000000000000990","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]],"date-time":"2021-08-09T16:50:30Z","timestamp":1628527830000},"page":"46-53","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Low-pressure Pneumoperitoneum With Abdominal Wall Lifting Versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Propensity Score\u2013matched Analysis"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Zhen","family":"Yu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Thoracic Surgery"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lei","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Thoracic Surgery"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ji-xiang","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"General Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tao","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Thoracic Surgery"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xing-guo","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Thoracic Surgery"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bao-xun","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Thoracic Surgery"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xin","family":"Du","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Thoracic Surgery"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1402","DOI":"10.1136\/gutjnl-2016-311715","article-title":"Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an update focusing on refractory reflux disease and Barrett\u2019s oesophagus","volume":"65","author":"Fock","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"R2-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2036.2007.03333.x","article-title":"Review article: the role of surgery in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease","volume":"25","author":"Vakil","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aliment Pharmacol Therr"},{"key":"R3-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1080\/00365520802495552","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Nissen versus Lind fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease","volume":"44","author":"Khan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Scand J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"R4-20250816","first-page":"D6930","article-title":"Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"3","author":"Gurusamy","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R5-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"836","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6651","article-title":"Systematic review of oxidative stress associated with pneumoperitoneum","volume":"96","author":"Sammour","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"R6-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.03.019","article-title":"Visualising improved peritoneal perfusion at lower intra-abdominal pressure by fluorescent imaging during laparoscopic surgery: a randomised controlled study","volume":"77","author":"Albers","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"R7-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeq185","article-title":"Acid-base alterations during laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a comparison with laparotomy","volume":"105","author":"Kwak","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R8-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1613","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des081","article-title":"Impact of intraperitoneal pressure of a CO2 pneumoperitoneum on the surgical peritoneal environment","volume":"27","author":"Matsuzaki","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R9-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-002-8786-x","article-title":"Effects of pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric bypass","volume":"18","author":"Nguyen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R10-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e31817f9878","article-title":"Effects of pneumoperitoneum and positioning on respiratory mechanics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients during Nissen fundoplication","volume":"18","author":"Salihoglu","year":"2008","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"R11-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1007\/s004640000343","article-title":"Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study","volume":"15","author":"Galizia","year":"2001","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R12-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2016.09.003","article-title":"Low pressure gynecological laparoscopy (7\u2009mm\u2009Hg) with AirSeal System versus a standard insufflation (15\u2009mm\u2009Hg): a pilot study in 60 patients","volume":"46","author":"Sroussi","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R13-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4454-9","article-title":"What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review","volume":"30","author":"Brunschot","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R14-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2016.02.043","article-title":"A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing systemic stress response in Laparoascopic cholecystectomy between low-pressure and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum","volume":"28","author":"Shoar","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"R15-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-002-9121-2","article-title":"A prospective randomized trial on comparison of low-pressure (LP) and standard-pressure (SP) pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"17","author":"Barczy\u0144ski","year":"2003","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R16-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182937980","article-title":"Comparison of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blinded randomized controlled study","volume":"24","author":"Vijayaraghavan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"R17-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/S1726-4901(08)70013-3","article-title":"Randomized trial of low-pressure carbon dioxide-elicited pneumoperitoneum versus abdominal wall lifting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"70","author":"Uen","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Chin Med Assoc"},{"key":"R18-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"890","DOI":"10.1007\/s004649901127","article-title":"Randomized comparison between low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"13","author":"Vezakis","year":"1999","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R19-20250816","first-page":"D6574","article-title":"Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"8","author":"Gurusamy","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R20-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.09.036","article-title":"Pneumoperitoneum pressures during pelvic laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"195","author":"Bogani","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"R21-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.12.091","article-title":"Low vs standard pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy: prospective randomized trial","volume":"21","author":"Bogani","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"R22-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1276","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15826","article-title":"Impact of different intraoperative CO2 pressure levels (8 and 15\u2009mm\u2009Hg) during laparoscopic hysterectomy performed due to benign uterine pathologies on postoperative pain and arterial pCO2: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial","volume":"126","author":"Radosa","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R23-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2012.0399","article-title":"Effects of varying intraperitoneal pressure on liver function tests during laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"23","author":"Gupta","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"R24-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1278","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v24.i11.1278","article-title":"Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with abdominal wall lift in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience","volume":"24","author":"Xia","year":"2018","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"R25-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1488","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mayocp.2018.05.026","article-title":"COPD guidelines: a review of the 2018 GOLD Report","volume":"93","author":"Mirza","year":"2018","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc"},{"key":"R26-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.10981","article-title":"Association between laparoscopic antireflux surgery and recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux","volume":"318","author":"Maret-Ouda","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R27-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-014-4035-5","article-title":"Gasless laparoscopically assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma","volume":"22","author":"Wu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"R28-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2382","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4488-z","article-title":"Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma","volume":"30","author":"Yu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R29-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-001-9166-7","article-title":"The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery","volume":"16","author":"Neudecker","year":"2002","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R30-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3181a97012","article-title":"A prospective randomized, controlled study comparing low pressure versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"19","author":"Joshipura","year":"2009","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"R31-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.1007\/s11596-016-1685-5","article-title":"Gasless laparoscopic surgery plus abdominal wall lifting for giant hiatal hernia-our single-center experience","volume":"36","author":"Yu","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci"},{"key":"R32-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000719","article-title":"Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"30","author":"Neogi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"R33-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-002-9046-9","article-title":"Randomized trial of different intraabdominal pressures and acid-base balance alterations during laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"17","author":"Sefr","year":"2003","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R34-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2013.01.011","article-title":"Positive end-expiratory pressure during laparoscopy: cardiac and respiratory effects","volume":"25","author":"Russo","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R35-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03011253","article-title":"Respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gases during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"43","author":"Iwasaka","year":"1996","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R36-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1195","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-017-1490-1","article-title":"Comparison of laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication using a propensity score matching analysis","volume":"47","author":"Hoshino","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"R37-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6304-z","article-title":"A retrospective multicenter analysis on redo-laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: conservative or conversion fundoplication?","volume":"33","author":"Al-Warith","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R38-20250816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-019-06676-3","article-title":"Mid-term safety profile evaluation of Bio-A absorbable synthetic mesh as cruroplasty reinforcement","volume":"33","author":"Iossa","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy &amp; Percutaneous Techniques"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000990","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,16]],"date-time":"2025-08-16T20:04:06Z","timestamp":1755374646000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000990"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/sle.0000000000000990","relation":{},"ISSN":["1534-4908"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1534-4908"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-03-04","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2021-04-26","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}