{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T09:31:42Z","timestamp":1790328702820,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PURPOSE:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aims of this study were to measure the incidence and severity of nasal septum injury in premature infants receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) via a noninvasive thin-walled cannula, and to evaluate the effect of a polyvinyl chloride foam barrier dressing in reducing these injuries.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>DESIGN:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Retrospective chart review, comparison cohort study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>SUBJECTS AND SETTING:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The sample comprised 235 neonates with a gestational age of 28 weeks or younger. Their mean gestational age was 26 weeks (range 22-28 weeks) and mean birth weight was 840 g (range 430-1320 g). The study setting was a level 4, regional neonatal intensive care unit housed in a 200-bed freestanding children's hospital located in the Northeastern United States.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Data were collected during 3 periods. During all 3 data collection periods, we used a soft, thin-walled nasal cannula, with a relatively short, binasal prong interphase and small diameter tubing connected to a ventilator circuit capable of transmitting positive airway pressure in neonates. During data collection periods 1 and 3, we used a polyvinyl foam barrier dressing as a preventive intervention against nasal skin damage; specifically, we placed a precut barrier on the prongs to protect the nasal skin. One side of the barrier foam has an adhesive surface, which was placed against the prongs. Study period 2 differed; during this period neonates were treated with the nasal cannula without the foam barrier based on manufacturer experience suggesting the foam barrier is not needed for prevention of skin damage. Pressure injuries (PIs) that occurred during each study period were staged according to National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel definitions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Eighty neonates were evaluated during study period 1 (thin-walled nasal cannula plus foam barrier). We evaluated 27 neonates during period 2 (thin-walled nasal cannula and no foam barrier) and 128 were evaluated during study period 3 (thin-walled nasal cannula plus foam barrier). Six neonates (7%) developed PIs during period 1, and 2 (1.5%) developed during study period 3. All were stage 1 and 2 PIs, no full-thickness injuries, also referred to as columella necrosis developed during use of the thin-walled nasal cannula in combination with the foam barrier dressings. In contrast, 13 PIs (48%) of neonates managed during data collection period 2 (thin-walled nasal cannula with no foam barrier) developed PI, and 40% experienced stage 3 PI or columella necrosis. This difference reflects a 6-fold increase in nasal injury occurred when nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) was administered without use of the protective barrier dressing.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSION:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We found clinically relevant difference in the occurrences of nasal PI in neonates managed with NCPAP; occurrences of stage 3 PI were 6-fold higher when a thin-walled cannula was used without a protective foam barrier dressing.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/won.0000000000000616","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,21]],"date-time":"2020-02-21T14:38:43Z","timestamp":1582295923000},"page":"111-116","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Pressure Injuries of the Nose and Columella in Preterm Neonates Receiving Noninvasive Ventilation via a Specialized Nasal Cannula"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"47","author":[{"given":"Vita","family":"Boyar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Vita Boyar, MD,Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, New Hyde Park, New York; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra\/Northwell, Hempstead, New York."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"R1-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cnc.2018.07.008","article-title":"Modes of neonatal ventilation: breathe deeply!","volume":"30","author":"Hughes","year":"2018","journal-title":"Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am"},{"key":"R3-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F447","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2009.179416","article-title":"Nasal trauma due to continuous positive airway pressure in neonates","volume":"95","author":"Fisher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"issue":"9","key":"R4-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ASW.0000577124.58253.66","article-title":"Pressure Injuries in the pediatric population: a National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel white paper","volume":"32","author":"Delmore","year":"2019","journal-title":"Adv Skin Wound Care"},{"key":"R5-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.enfie.2017.03.006","article-title":"Prevention and treatment of skin lesions associated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Recommendations of experts","volume":"28","author":"Raurell-Torreda","year":"2017","journal-title":"Enferm Intensiva"},{"key":"R6-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2267","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-004-2267-8","article-title":"Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborn","volume":"30","author":"Buettiker","year":"2004","journal-title":"Intensive Care Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"R7-20230826","first-page":"302","article-title":"An integrative review of skin breakdown in the preterm infant associated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure","volume":"12","author":"Newman","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstetr Gynecol Neonatal Nurs"},{"key":"R8-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F29","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2017-313418","article-title":"Nasal injury in preterm infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support: a systematic review","volume":"103","author":"Imbulana","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"R9-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F480","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2004.069351","article-title":"Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during CPAP treatment in very low birth weight infants: a randomized control study","volume":"90","author":"Yong","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"issue":"3","key":"R10-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1001\/archoto.2010.15","article-title":"Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and cannula use in the neonatal intensive care unit setting","volume":"136","author":"Jatana","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"R11-20230826","first-page":"80","article-title":"Dressings can prevent pressure ulcers: fact or fallacy? The problem of pressure ulcer prevention","volume":"5","author":"Butcher","year":"2009","journal-title":"Wounds UK"},{"issue":"3","key":"R13-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.12101","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the border trial","volume":"12","author":"Santamaria","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Wound J"},{"issue":"3","key":"R14-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2011-0649","article-title":"Prevention of tracheostomy-related pressure ulcers in children","volume":"129","author":"Boesch","year":"2012","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"R15-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.12111","article-title":"Use of wound dressings to enhance prevention of pressure ulcers caused by medical devices","volume":"12","author":"Black","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Wound J"},{"issue":"6","key":"R16-20230826","first-page":"1","article-title":"Systematic use of the RAM nasal canula in the Yale-New Haven Children's hospital neonatal intensive care unit: a quality improvement project","volume":"28","author":"Nzegwu","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"R17-20230826","first-page":"396","article-title":"Nasal ventilation in preterm infants: a novel means of delivering time-cycled, pressure and flow-limited intermittent mandatory ventilation via nasal cannula in newborn infants","volume":"97","author":"Ramanathan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neonatology"},{"key":"R18-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1053\/siny.2000.0013","article-title":"The epidermal barrier","volume":"5","author":"Cartlidge","year":"2000","journal-title":"Semin Neonatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"R19-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1891\/0730-0832.30.5.291","article-title":"Wound care in the neonatal intensive care unit","volume":"30","author":"Fox","year":"2011","journal-title":"Neonatal Netw"},{"issue":"4","key":"R20-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ASW.0000266646.43159.99","article-title":"Pressure ulcers in neonates and children: an NPUAP white paper","volume":"20","author":"Baharestani","year":"2007","journal-title":"Adv Skin Wound Care"},{"key":"R21-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jnn.2017.09.004","article-title":"Prevention of neonatal pressure injuries","volume":"24","author":"Grosvenor","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Neonatal Nurs"},{"key":"R22-20230826","first-page":"111","article-title":"The pressure relief efficacy of hydrocolloid face cover in patients with noninvasive BIPAP ventilation","volume":"7","author":"Weng","year":"2006","journal-title":"Taiwan Crit Care Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R23-20230826","article-title":"Evaluating dressings for the prevention of facial pressure ulcers caused by the application of noninvasive positive pressure ventilator patients: a pilot study","volume":"5","author":"Hsu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Wounds Int"},{"key":"R24-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2018.05.026","article-title":"A Randomized controlled trial of a barrier dressing to reduce nasal injury in preterm infants receiving binasal noninvasive respiratory support","volume":"201","author":"Imbulana","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"issue":"3","key":"R25-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1007\/s13312-010-0047-9","article-title":"Effects of silicone gel sheeting in nasal injury associated with nasal CPAP in preterm infants","volume":"47","author":"Gunlemez","year":"2010","journal-title":"Indian Pediatr"},{"issue":"3","key":"R26-20230826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.13101","article-title":"Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask","volume":"16","author":"Cohen","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Wound J"}],"container-title":["Journal of Wound, Ostomy &amp; Continence Nursing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/WON.0000000000000616","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,26]],"date-time":"2023-08-26T03:14:09Z","timestamp":1693019649000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/WON.0000000000000616"}},"subtitle":["A Retrospective Comparison Cohort Study"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/won.0000000000000616","relation":{},"ISSN":["1071-5754"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1071-5754","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]}}}