{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T21:53:22Z","timestamp":1762034002966,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Debriefing is an essential procedure for identifying medical errors, improving communication, reviewing team performance, and providing emotional support after a critical event. This study aimed to describe the current practice and limitations of debriefing and gauge opinions on the best timing, effectiveness, need for training, use of established format, and expected goals of debriefing among Portuguese anesthesiologists.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>We performed a national cross-sectional online survey exploring the practice of anesthesiologists' debriefing practice after critical events in Portuguese hospitals. The questionnaire was distributed using a snowball sampling technique from July to September 2021. Data were descriptively and comparatively analyzed.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>We had replies from 186 anesthesiologists (11.3% of the Portuguese pool). Acute respiratory event was the most reported type of critical event (96%). Debriefing occurred rarely or never in 53% of cases, 59% of respondents needed more training in debriefing, and only 4% reported having specific tools in their institutions to carry it out. There was no statistical association between having a debriefing protocol and the occurrence of critical events (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>=.474) or having trained personnel (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>=.95). The existence of protocols was associated with lower frequencies of debriefing (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>=.017).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Portuguese anesthesiologists know that debriefing is an essential process that increases patient safety, but among those surveyed, there is a need for an adequate debriefing culture or practice.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Trial registration:<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Research registry 7741 (https:\/\/www.researchregistry.com\/browse-the-registry#home).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/j.pbj.0000000000000215","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,24]],"date-time":"2023-06-24T10:22:05Z","timestamp":1687602125000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Practice of debriefing of critical events: a survey-based cross-sectional study of Portuguese anesthesiologists"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"8","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0653-6290","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel","family":"Teles","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Centre of S\u00e3o Jo\u00e3o, Porto, Portugal"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0074-8575","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mariana","family":"Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Centre of S\u00e3o Jo\u00e3o, Porto, Portugal"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8695-4264","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joana","family":"Berger-Estilita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland"},{"name":"CINTESIS\u2014Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5921-8093","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Helder","family":"Pereira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Centre of S\u00e3o Jo\u00e3o, Porto, Portugal"},{"name":"Surgery and Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20241001","first-page":"S14","article-title":"The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (Thai Study) of anesthetic outcomes: II. anesthetic profiles and adverse events","volume":"88","author":"Charuluxananan","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai."},{"key":"R3-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1111\/medu.12432","article-title":"Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"48","author":"Cheng","year":"2014","journal-title":"Med Educ."},{"key":"R4-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2014.172","article-title":"Improving safety and quality of care with enhanced teamwork through operating room briefings","volume":"149","author":"Hicks","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Surg."},{"key":"R5-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1186\/s41077-021-00161-5","article-title":"\u201cA debriefer must be neutral\u201d and other debriefing myths: a systemic inquiry-based qualitative study of taken-for-granted beliefs about clinical post-event debriefing","volume":"6","author":"Seelandt","year":"2021","journal-title":"Adv Simulation"},{"key":"R6-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anclin.2007.03.007","article-title":"Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry","volume":"25","author":"Rudolph","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anesthesiol Clin."},{"key":"R7-20241001","first-page":"518","article-title":"Debriefing medical teams: 12 evidence-based best practices and tips","volume":"34","author":"Salas","year":"2008","journal-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf."},{"key":"R8-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.2310\/8000.2013.131136","article-title":"Postresuscitation debriefing in the pediatric emergency department: a national needs assessment","volume":"16","author":"Sandhu","year":"2014","journal-title":"CJEM"},{"key":"R9-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-010-9267-7","article-title":"The effect of unanticipated perioperative death on anesthesiologists","volume":"57","author":"Todesco","year":"2010","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth."},{"key":"R10-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1097\/JPN.0b013e3181f6b5ec","article-title":"Debriefing in simulated-based learning: facilitating a reflective discussion","volume":"24","author":"Arafeh","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Perinat Neonatal Nurs."},{"key":"R11-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2333","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.15741","article-title":"Educational opportunities with postevent debriefing","volume":"312","author":"Mullan","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R12-20241001","first-page":"310","article-title":"Critical incident stress debriefing after adverse patient safety events","volume":"23","author":"Harrison","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Manag Care"},{"issue":"16_suppl_1","key":"R13-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S222","DOI":"10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000896","article-title":"Education, implementation, and teams: 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations","volume":"142","author":"Greif","year":"2020","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"R14-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1080\/00050060310001707147","article-title":"Psychological debriefing and the workplace: defining a concept, controversies and guidelines for intervention","volume":"38","author":"Devilly","year":"2003","journal-title":"Aust Psychol."},{"key":"R15-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1136\/emj.2007.048942","article-title":"Debriefing after failed paediatric resuscitation: a survey of current UK practice","volume":"25","author":"Ireland","year":"2008","journal-title":"Emerg Med J."},{"key":"R16-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X0503300611","article-title":"Debriefing after critical incidents for anaesthetic trainees","volume":"33","author":"Tan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anaesth Intensive Care"},{"key":"R17-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000002649","article-title":"Failure to debrief after critical events in anesthesia is associated with failures in communication during the event","volume":"130","author":"Arriaga","year":"2019","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R18-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1108\/10662241211199960","article-title":"Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook","volume":"22","author":"Baltar","year":"2012","journal-title":"Internet Res."},{"issue":"3","key":"R19-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2019.12.022","article-title":"Perceptions of gender equity in departmental leadership, research opportunities, and clinical work attitudes: an international survey of 11781 anaesthesiologists","volume":"124","author":"Zdravkovic","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth."},{"key":"R20-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.20344\/amp.10094","article-title":"Censos 2017: existe n\u00famero suficiente de anestesiologistas em Portugal?","volume":"31","author":"Lemos","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta M\u00e9dica Portuguesa"},{"key":"R21-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1097\/PEC.0000000000000196","article-title":"National survey of pediatric emergency medicine fellows on debriefing after medical resuscitations","volume":"31","author":"Zinns","year":"2015","journal-title":"Pediatr Emerg Care"},{"key":"R22-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1614","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000001227","article-title":"In the aftermath: attitudes of anesthesiologists to supportive strategies after an unexpected intraoperative patient death","volume":"122","author":"Heard","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anesth Analg."},{"key":"R23-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1097\/SIH.0b013e318294854e","article-title":"Helping without harming: the instructor's feedback dilemma in debriefing\u2014a case study","volume":"8","author":"Rudolph","year":"2013","journal-title":"Simul Healthc."},{"key":"R24-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nedt.2018.09.001","article-title":"Instructor-led vs. peer-led debriefing in preoperative care simulation using standardized patients","volume":"71","author":"Kim","year":"2018","journal-title":"Nurse Educ Today"},{"key":"R25-20241001","first-page":"107","article-title":"Students' perception of peer and faculty debriefing facilitators following simulation- based education","volume":"47","author":"Doherty-Restrepo","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Allied Health"},{"key":"R26-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7408.185","article-title":"Doctors\u2019 emotional reactions to recent death of a patient: cross sectional study of hospital doctors","volume":"327","author":"Redinbaugh","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R27-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anclin.2020.08.003","article-title":"Real-time debriefing after critical events: exploring the gap between principle and reality","volume":"38","author":"Arriaga","year":"2020","journal-title":"Anesthesiol Clin."},{"key":"R28-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1016\/j.resuscitation.2012.12.005","article-title":"Implementation of an in situ qualitative debriefing tool for resuscitations","volume":"84","author":"Mullan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Resuscitation"},{"key":"R29-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1381","DOI":"10.1080\/0142159X.2021.1948521","article-title":"Communication content during debriefing in simulation-based medical education: an analytic framework and mixed-methods analysis","volume":"43","author":"Berger-Estilita","year":"2021","journal-title":"Med Teach."},{"key":"R30-20241001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1541","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.1331","article-title":"Charter on physician well-being","volume":"319","author":"Thomas","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R31-20241001","first-page":"e8822","article-title":"Critical event debriefing in a community hospital","volume":"12","author":"Ugwu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cureus"}],"container-title":["Porto Biomedical Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/j.pbj.0000000000000215","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,1]],"date-time":"2024-10-01T19:03:08Z","timestamp":1727809388000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1097\/j.pbj.0000000000000215"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/j.pbj.0000000000000215","relation":{},"ISSN":["2444-8664"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2444-8664"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-11-22","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-04-20","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}