{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T12:15:47Z","timestamp":1774959347286,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,1]],"date-time":"2013-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1362096000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,1]],"date-time":"2013-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1362096000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100020485","name":"CooperVision","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100020485","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["OVS"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare visual performance with the Biofinity multifocal (MF) contact lens with monovision (MV) with the Biofinity single\u2010vision contact lens.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A crossover study of 20 presbyopic patients was conducted. Patients were randomized first into either an MF or an MV lens for 15 days for each modality, with a washout period between each lens type. Measurements included monocular and binocular high\u2010 and low\u2010contrast logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (VA) at distance and near visions, binocular distance contrast sensitivity function, and near stereoacuity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      At 15 days, patients lost fewer than two letters (half a line of VA) of binocular distance and near VA, with the MF and MV lens under high\u2010 and low\u2010contrast conditions (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &gt; 0.05 for both comparisons). No statistically significant differences were seen in binocular VA at near or distance with either lens. However, the monocular distance VA improved significantly in the nondominant eye, with the MF lens by one line over the 15\u2010day period under high\u2010contrast (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.023) and low\u2010contrast (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.035) conditions; this effect was not seen with the MV lens. Contrast sensitivity function was within the normal limits with both lenses. The stereoacuity was significantly (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.01) better with MF than with MV.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Multifocal contact lens correction provided satisfactory levels of VA comparable with MV without compromising stereoacuity in this crossover study. The near vision significantly improved in the dominant eye, and the distance vision improved in the nondominant eye from 1 to 15 days with the MF lens, suggesting that patients adapted to the multifocality overtime, whereas this was not true for MV.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1097\/opx.0b013e318282951b","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,1]],"date-time":"2013-02-01T12:26:17Z","timestamp":1359721577000},"page":"228-235","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":78,"title":["Adaptation to Multifocal and Monovision Contact Lens Correction"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"90","author":[{"given":"Paulo R.B.","family":"Fernandes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry Research Laboratory (CEORLab) Center of Physics (Optometry) School of Sciences University of Minho Braga Portugal"}]},{"given":"Helena I. F.","family":"Neves","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry Research Laboratory (CEORLab) Center of Physics (Optometry) School of Sciences University of Minho Braga Portugal"}]},{"given":"Daniela P.","family":"Lopes\u2010Ferreira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry Research Laboratory (CEORLab) Center of Physics (Optometry) School of Sciences University of Minho Braga Portugal"}]},{"given":"Jorge M.M.","family":"Jorge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry Research Laboratory (CEORLab) Center of Physics (Optometry) School of Sciences University of Minho Braga Portugal"}]},{"given":"Jos\u00e9 M.","family":"Gonz\u00e1lez\u2010Meijome","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry Research Laboratory (CEORLab) Center of Physics (Optometry) School of Sciences University of Minho Braga Portugal"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2009.05.003","article-title":"Contact lens correction of presbyopia","volume":"32","author":"Morgan PB","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cont Lens Anterior Eye"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2010.00524.x","article-title":"An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia","volume":"94","author":"Morgan PB","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2007.00488.x","article-title":"Monovision: a review","volume":"27","author":"Evans BJ","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2007.00242.x","article-title":"Contact lens correction of presbyopia","volume":"91","author":"Bennett ES","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318194eb18","article-title":"Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision","volume":"86","author":"Gupta N","year":"2009","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1097\/01.opx.0000216098.62165.34","article-title":"Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low\u2010astigmatic presbyopia","volume":"83","author":"Richdale K","year":"2006","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1577","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.121.11.1577","article-title":"Associations of presbyopia with vision\u2010targeted health\u2010related quality of life","volume":"121","author":"McDonnell PJ","year":"2003","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2010.00530.x","article-title":"Stereoacuity with balanced presbyopic contact lenses","volume":"94","author":"Ferrer\u2010Blasco T","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e3181eb98b9","article-title":"Stereoacuity with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses","volume":"87","author":"Ferrer\u2010Blasco T","year":"2010","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2011.00666.x","article-title":"Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses","volume":"95","author":"Llorente\u2010Guillemot A","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ICL.0000072827.42925.49","article-title":"Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses","volume":"29","author":"Situ P","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eye Contact Lens"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.88.1.11","article-title":"The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research","volume":"88","author":"Pesudovs K","year":"2004","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1097\/ICL.0b013e3181a20361","article-title":"Utility of short\u2010term evaluation of presbyopic contact lens performance","volume":"35","author":"Papas EB","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eye Contact Lens"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1097\/01.opx.0000232185.00091.45","article-title":"Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses","volume":"83","author":"Rajagopalan AS","year":"2006","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","first-page":"917","article-title":"Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia","volume":"26","author":"Goodwin RT","year":"1985","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/S1888-4296(11)70046-2","article-title":"Task oriented visual satisfaction and wearing success with two different simultaneous vision multifocal soft contact lenses","volume":"4","author":"Gispets J","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Optom"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","first-page":"1267","article-title":"Influence of presbyopic corrections on driving\u2010related eye and head movements","volume":"86","author":"Chu BS","year":"2009","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1097\/ICL.0b013e3181a1435e","article-title":"Effect of presbyopic vision corrections on perceptions of driving difficulty","volume":"35","author":"Chu BS","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eye Contact Lens"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4861","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.10-5154","article-title":"The effect of presbyopic vision corrections on nighttime driving performance","volume":"51","author":"Chu BS","year":"2010","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"}],"container-title":["Optometry and Vision Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318282951b","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318282951b","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318282951b","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T11:35:33Z","timestamp":1774956933000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318282951b"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318282951b"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/opx.0b013e318282951b","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1040-5488","1538-9235"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1040-5488","type":"print"},{"value":"1538-9235","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]}}}