{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T19:27:35Z","timestamp":1792697255912,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"The Royal Society","issue":"1458","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,28]],"date-time":"2005-06-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1119916800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/royalsociety.org\/journals\/ethics-policies\/data-sharing-mining\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,29]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The attitudes of scientists towards the philosophy of science is mixed and includes considerable indifference and some hostility. This may be due in part to unrealistic expectation and to misunderstanding. Philosophy is unlikely directly to improve scientific practices, but scientists may find the attempt to explain how science works and what it achieves of considerable interest nevertheless. The present state of the philosophy of science is illustrated by recent work on the \u2018truth hypothesis\u2019, according to which, science is generating increasingly accurate representations of a mind-independent and largely unobservable world. According to Karl Popper, although truth is the aim of science, it is impossible to justify the truth hypothesis. According to Thomas Kuhn, the truth hypothesis is false, because scientists can only describe a world that is partially constituted by their own theories and hence not mind-independent. The failure of past scientific theories has been used to argue against the truth hypothesis; the success of the best current theories has been used to argue for it. Neither argument is sound.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1098\/rstb.2005.1660","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,28]],"date-time":"2005-06-28T15:43:31Z","timestamp":1119973411000},"page":"1259-1269","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["The Medawar Lecture 2004 The truth about science"],"prefix":"10.1098","volume":"360","author":[{"given":"Peter","family":"Lipton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of CambridgeFree School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"175","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_1_2_1","unstructured":"Bacon F Novum Organum. [Reprinted in The new organon and related writings (ed. F. H. Anderson). Bobbs-Merrill (Indianapolis IN) 1960.] (1620)."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_3_1","unstructured":"Duhem P The aim and structure of physical theory. [Reprinted by Princeton University Press 1954.] (1914)."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Howson C Hume's problem. 2000 Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/0198250371.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hume D An enquiry concerning human understanding. [Reprinted by Oxford University Press 1999.] (1748).","DOI":"10.1093\/oseo\/instance.00032980"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kahneman D Slovic P& Tversky A Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. 1982 Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511809477"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_7_1","unstructured":"Kant I Prolegomena to any future metaphysics. [Reprinted by Hackett (Indianapolis IN) 1977.] (1783)."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_8_1","volume-title":"Scientific change","author":"Kuhn T","year":"1963"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_9_1","unstructured":"Kuhn T The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd edn. 1970 University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226217239.001.0001","volume-title":"The essential tension","author":"Kuhn T","year":"1977"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520337442-012","volume-title":"Scientific realism","author":"Laudan L","year":"1984"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lipton P Inference to the best explanation. 2nd edn. 2004 London:Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203470855"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Locke J An essay concerning human understanding. [Reprinted by Oxford University Press 1975.] (1689).","DOI":"10.1093\/oseo\/instance.00018020"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_14_1","unstructured":"Medawar P Pluto's republic. 1982 Oxford University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Popper K The logic of scientific discovery. 1959 London:Hutchinson.","DOI":"10.1063\/1.3060577"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_16_1","unstructured":"Popper K Conjectures and refutations. 1962 London:Routledge."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_17_1","unstructured":"Popper K Objective knowledge. 1972 Oxford University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_18_1","unstructured":"Putnam H Meaning and the moral sciences. 1978 London:Hutchinson."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2181906"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/51.4.729"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Fraassen B.C The scientific image. 1980 Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/0198244274.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_22_1","volume-title":"Philosophy of science","author":"Worrall J","year":"1996"}],"container-title":["Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/royalsocietypublishing.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1098\/rstb.2005.1660","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/royalsocietypublishing.org\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1098\/rstb.2005.1660","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/royalsocietypublishing.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1098\/rstb.2005.1660","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T21:20:06Z","timestamp":1778620806000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/royalsocietypublishing.org\/rstb\/article\/360\/1458\/1259-1269\/20550"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,28]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1458","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,29]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1098\/rstb.2005.1660"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rstb.2005.1660","relation":{},"ISSN":["0962-8436","1471-2970"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0962-8436","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-2970","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,28]]}}}