{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T20:07:10Z","timestamp":1771013230622,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"2\/3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,22]],"date-time":"2011-03-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1300752000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,22]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to analyse the publications of, and the citations to, the current staff of 19 departments of computer science in Malaysian universities, and to compare these bibliometric data with expert peer reviews of Malaysian research performance.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper searches citation of the Scopus and Web of Science databases.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>Both publication and citation rates are low, although this is at least in part due to some Malaysian universities having only a teaching function. More of the departments' publications were identified in Scopus than in Web of Science, but both databases were needed for comprehensive coverage. Statistically significant relationships were observed between the departments' publication and citation counts and the rankings of the departments' parent universities in two evaluations of the research performance of Malaysian universities.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>This is the first comparison of bibliometric and peer\u2010review data for Malaysia, and, more generally, for a country with a newly developed higher education system.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/00012531111135727","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,21]],"date-time":"2011-05-21T07:45:45Z","timestamp":1305963945000},"page":"321-335","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Computer science research in Malaysia: a bibliometric analysis"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"63","author":[{"given":"Aryati","family":"Bakri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Willett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.A. and Caprasecca, A. (2009), \u201cAllocative efficiency in public research funding: can bibliometrics help?\u201d, Research Policy, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 206\u201015.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2008.11.001"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aksnes, D.W. (2008), \u201cWhen different persons have an identical author name. How frequent are homonyms?\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59 No. 5, pp. 838\u201041.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.20788"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y. and Lariviere, V. (2009), \u201cComparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 60 No. 7, pp. 1320\u20106.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21062"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arunachalam, S. (2003), \u201cInformation for research in developing countries: information technology \u2013 friend or foe?\u201d, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 16\u201021.","DOI":"10.1002\/bult.286"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baird, L.M. and Oppenheim, C. (1994), \u201cDo citations matter?\u201d, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 1\u201015.","DOI":"10.1177\/016555159402000102"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b6","unstructured":"Bakri, A. and Willett, P. (2009), \u201cThe Malaysian Journal of Computer Science 1996\u20102006: a bibliometric study\u201d, Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 39\u201049."},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bar\u2010Ilan, J. (2008), \u201cWhich h\u2010index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 74 No. 2, pp. 257\u201071.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-008-0216-y"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bauer, K. and Bakkalbasi, N. (2005), An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment, available at: www.dlib.org\/dlib\/september05\/bauer\/09bauer.html (accessed 12 February 2010).","DOI":"10.1045\/september2005-bauer"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis, C.H. and Eisemon, T.O. (1989), \u201cMainstream and non\u2010mainstream scientific literature in four peripheral Asian scientific communities\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 215\u201039.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02017200"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Falagas, M.E., Pitsouni, E.I., Malietzis, G.A. and Pappas, G. (2008), \u201cComparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses\u201d, FASEB Journal, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 338\u201042.","DOI":"10.1096\/fj.07-9492LSF"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gavel, Y. and Iselib, L. (2008), \u201cWeb of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study\u201d, Online Information Review, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 8\u201021.","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520810865958"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gu, Y. (2002), \u201cAn exploratory study of Malaysian publication productivity in computer science and information technology\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53 No. 12, pp. 974\u201086.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.10125"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guan, J. and Ma, N. (2004), \u201cA comparative study of research performance in computer science\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 61 No. 3, pp. 339\u201059.","DOI":"10.1023\/B:SCIE.0000045114.85737.1b"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jacs\u00f3, P. (2008a), \u201cThe plausibility of computing the h\u2010index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference\u2010enhanced databases\u201d, Online Information Review, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 266\u201083.","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520810879872"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jacs\u00f3, P. (2008b), \u201cThe pros and cons of computing the h\u2010index using Google Scholar\u201d, Online Information Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 437\u201052.","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520810889718"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jacs\u00f3, P. (2008c), \u201cThe pros and cons of computing the h\u2010index using Scopus\u201d, Online Information Review, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 524\u201035.","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520810897403"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kumar, S. and Garg, K.C. (2005), \u201cScientometrics of computer science research in India and China\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 64 No. 2, pp. 121\u201032.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-005-0244-9"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li, J., Sanderson, M., Willett, P., Norris, M. and Oppenheim, C. (2010), \u201cRanking of library and information science researchers: comparison of data sources for correlating citation data and expert judgments\u201d, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 554\u201063.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2010.06.005"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lopez\u2010Illescas, C., De Moya Anegon, F. and Moed, H.F. (2009), \u201cComparing bibliometric country\u2010by\u2010country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: the effect of poorly cited journals in oncology\u201d, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 244\u201056.","DOI":"10.1177\/0165551508098603"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ma, R., Ni, C. and Qiu, J. (2008), \u201cScientific research competitiveness of world universities in computer science\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 245\u201060.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-007-1913-7"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meho, L.I. and Rogers, Y. (2008), \u201cCitation counting, citation ranking, and h\u2010index of human\u2010computer interaction researchers: a comparison between Scopus and Web of Science\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59 No. 11, pp. 1711\u201026.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.20874"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meho, L.I. and Sugimoto, C.R. (2009), \u201cAssessing the scholarly impact of information studies: a tale of two citation databases \u2013 Scopus and Web of Science\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 60 No. 11, pp. 2499\u2010508.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21165"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meho, L. and Yang, K. (2007), \u201cImpact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58 No. 13, pp. 2105\u201025.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.20677"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b24","unstructured":"Moed, H.F. and Visser, M.S. (2007), Developing Bibliometric Indicators of Research Performance in Computer Science: An Exploratory Study, available at: www.cwts.nl\/pdf\/NWO_Inf_Final_Report_V_210207.pdf (accessed 12 February 2010)."},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Norris, M. and Oppenheim, C. (2003), \u201cCitation counts and the Research Assessment Exercise V: Archaeology and the 2001 RAE\u201d, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 59 No. 6, pp. 709\u201030.","DOI":"10.1108\/00220410310698734"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Norris, M. and Oppenheim, C. (2007), \u201cComparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences literature\u201d, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 161\u20109.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2006.12.001"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oppenheim, C. (1997), \u201cThe correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology\u201d, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 477\u201087.","DOI":"10.1108\/EUM0000000007207"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reale, E., Barbara, A. and Costantini, A. (2007), \u201cPeer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience\u201d, Research Evaluation, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 216\u201028.","DOI":"10.3152\/095820207X227501"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rinia, E.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., van Vuren, H.G. and van Raan, A.F.J. (1998), \u201cComparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria. Evaluation of condensed matter physics in The Netherlands\u201d, Research Policy, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 95\u2010107.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0048-7333(98)00026-2"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanderson, M. (2008), \u201cRevisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59 No. 7, pp. 1184\u201090.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.20771"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seng, L.B. and Willett, P. (1995), \u201cThe citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools\u201d, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 68\u201071.","DOI":"10.1177\/016555159502100109"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b32","unstructured":"Shari, S. and Ahmad, A. (2005), \u201cBibliometric study on Malaysian ICT knowledge productivity 1981\u20102002\u201d, Proceedings of \u2018Wacana Intelek\u2019 UiTM Kedah, Alor Star, UiTM."},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b33","unstructured":"Siegel, S. and Castellan, N.J. (1988), Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw\u2010Hill, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b34","unstructured":"Snoeyink, J. (2005), Publication Culture in Computer Science, A White Paper for the UNC\u2010Chapel Hill Scholarly Communications Convocation, available at: www.unc.edu\/scholcomdig\/whitepapers\/snoeyink.pdf (accessed 12 February 2010)."},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b35","unstructured":"Times Higher Education (2008), Times Higher Education Table of Excellence, available at: www.timeshighereducation.co.uk\/Journals\/THE\/THE\/18_December_2008\/attachments\/RAE_2008_THE_RESULTS.pdf (accessed 12 February 2010)."},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Leeuwen, T.N. (2009), \u201cStrength and weakness of national science systems: a bibliometric analysis through cooperation patterns\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 79 No. 2, pp. 389\u2010408.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-009-0426-y"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Raan, A.F.J. (2006), \u201cComparison of Hirsch\u2010index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 67 No. 3, pp. 491\u2010502.","DOI":"10.1556\/Scient.67.2006.3.10"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vieira, E.S. and Gomes, J.A.N.F. (2009), \u201cA comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 81 No. 2, pp. 587\u2010600.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-009-2178-0"},{"key":"key2022013019475248900_b39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wainer, J., Xavier, E.C. and Bezerra, F. (2009), \u201cScientific production in computer science: a comparative study of Brazil and other countries\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 81 No. 2, pp. 535\u201047.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-008-2156-y"}],"container-title":["Aslib Proceedings"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/00012531111135727","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00012531111135727\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00012531111135727\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T11:37:13Z","timestamp":1753357033000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/ajim\/article\/63\/2-3\/321-335\/63477"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Peter","family":"Willett","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,22]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2\/3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,22]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/00012531111135727"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/00012531111135727","relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-253X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-253X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,22]]}}}