{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:08:39Z","timestamp":1754154519525,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":3,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,20]],"date-time":"2011-09-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1316476800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,20]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to examine how journals expanded to accommodate the growth in scholarly writing from 1950 to 2000, and how the policy response differed between for\u2010profit and non\u2010profit publishers.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>Taking economics as an example and using an authoritative list of journals, data were collected and analyzed for the first issue of each decade on new journals, frequency of issues, number of articles published and pages per issue. Each journal was assigned to one of three ownership categories and growth policies analyzed separately for each.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>Overall primary reliance was placed on launching new journals and increasing the frequency of issue. However, there was a marked difference between for\u2010profits and non\u2010profits. The former launched most new journals and increased publication frequency while keeping individual issues quite short. By contrast, the latter added few journals or issues, but did systematically include more articles in each issue.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper looks behind the general growth in scholarly literature to analyze how journals have used the available tools \u2013 new journals, more frequent issues, and longer issues \u2013 to accommodate the dramatic increase in the number of articles written. Particularly original is the demonstration that for\u2010profits and non\u2010profits have used these tools in very different ways.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/00012531111164950","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,24]],"date-time":"2011-09-24T07:41:57Z","timestamp":1316850117000},"page":"445-463","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["How ownership affects the growth strategies of scientific journals"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"63","author":[{"given":"Colin","family":"Day","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022012620203302500_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Day, C. (2010), \u201cJudging journal prices: a cost index for academic journals\u201d, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 145\u201062.","DOI":"10.1353\/scp.0.0079"},{"key":"key2022012620203302500_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pieters, R. and Baumgartner, H. (2002), \u201cWho talks to who? Intra\u2010 and inter\u2010disciplinary communication in economics journals\u201d, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XL No. 2, pp. 483\u2010509.","DOI":"10.1257\/jel.40.2.483"},{"key":"key2022012620203302500_b3","unstructured":"Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. (2000), Towards Electronic Journals, SAL Publishing, Washington, DC."}],"container-title":["Aslib Proceedings"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/00012531111164950","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00012531111164950\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00012531111164950\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T11:37:14Z","timestamp":1753357034000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/ajim\/article\/63\/5\/445-463\/63449"}},"subtitle":["A study of economics journals 1950 to 2000"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,20]]},"references-count":3,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,20]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/00012531111164950"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/00012531111164950","relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-253X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0001-253X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,20]]}}}