{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,5]],"date-time":"2026-04-05T09:38:37Z","timestamp":1775381917492,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,7,1]],"date-time":"2006-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1151712000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,7,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of the paper is to analyse the structure of a small number of abstracts that have appeared in the CABI database over a number of years, during which time the authorship of the abstracts changed from CABI editorial staff to journal article authors themselves. This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology in an effort to discover whether these abstracts followed generally agreed abstracting guidelines.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>The method adopted was a move analysis of the text of the abstracts. This move analysis revealed a five\u2010move pattern: move 1 situates the research within the scientific community; move 2 introduces the research by either describing the main features of the research or presenting its purpose; move 3 describes the methodology; move 4 states the results; and move 5 draws conclusions or suggests practical applications.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>Thematic analysis shows that scientific abstract authors thematise their subject by referring to the discourse domain or the \u201creal\u201d world. Not all of the abstracts succeeded in following the guideline advice. However, there was general consistency regarding semantic organisation and thematic structure.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>The research limitations were the small number of abstracts examined, from just one subject domain.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Practical limitations<\/jats:title><jats:p>The practical implications are the need for abstracting services to be clearer and more prescriptive regarding how they want abstracts to be structured as the lack of formal training in abstract writing increases the risk of subjectivity and verbosity and reduces clarity in scientific abstracts. Another implication of the research are that abstracting and indexing services must ensure that they maintain abstract quality if they introduce policies of accepting author abstracts. This is important as there is probably little formal training in abstract writing for science students at present. Recommendations for further research are made.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/00220410610700953","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,13]],"date-time":"2007-04-13T09:38:13Z","timestamp":1176457093000},"page":"428-446","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":56,"title":["A genre analysis of scientific abstracts"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"62","author":[{"given":"Cate","family":"Cross","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Charles","family":"Oppenheim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b1","unstructured":"American National Standards Institute (ANSI) (1979), American National Standard for Writing Abstracts (ANSI Z39.14\u20101979)."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b2","unstructured":"Anderson, J.R. (2000), Cognitive Psychology and its Implications, 5th ed., Worth Publishers, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Armstrong, C.J. and Wheatley, A. (1998), \u201cWriting abstracts for online databases\u201d, Program, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 359\u201071.","DOI":"10.1108\/EUM0000000006905"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b4","unstructured":"Bhatia, V.K. (1993), Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings, Longman, London."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b5","unstructured":"Blakeborough, L. and Oppenheim, C. (1980), \u201cThe readability and information content of new law abstracts and old law abridgements\u201d, Journal of Chartered Institute of Patent Agents, Vol. 10, pp. 86\u201092."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b6","unstructured":"Borko, H. and Bernier, C.L. (1975), Abstracting Concepts and Methods, Academic Press, London."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983), Discourse Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511805226"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Busch\u2010Lauer, I.A. (1995), \u201cAbstracts in German medical journals: a linguistic analysis\u201d, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 769\u201076.","DOI":"10.1016\/0306-4573(95)00024-B"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b9","unstructured":"Cremmins, E.T. (1996), The Art of Abstracting, 2nd ed., Information Resources Press, Arlington, VA."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Endres\u2010Niggemeyer, B. (1998), Summarizing Information: Including CD\u2010Rom \u201cSimSum\u201d, Simulation of Summarizing, for Macintosh and Windows, Springer, Berlin.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-72025-3"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Endres\u2010Niggemeyer, B., Maier, E. and Sigel, A. (1995), \u201cHow to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting: four core working steps of an expert abstractor\u201d, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 631\u201074.","DOI":"10.1016\/0306-4573(95)00028-F"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fox, C. and Hartley, J. (2003), \u201cAbstracts, introductions and discussions: how far do they differ in style?\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 57 No. 7, pp. 389\u201098.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1025008802657"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b13","unstructured":"Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R. (1993), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power, Falmer Press, London."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartley, J. (1994), \u201cThree ways to improve the clarity of journal abstracts\u201d, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 331\u201043.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01106.x"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b15","unstructured":"Hartley, J. and Sydes, M. (1995), \u201cStructured abstracts in the social sciences: presentation, readability, recall\u201d, BLR&DD report 6211."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartley, J., Sydes, M. and Burton, A. (1996), \u201cObtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient?\u201d, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 349\u201056.","DOI":"10.1177\/016555159602200503"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b17","unstructured":"Junker, K. (1999), \u201cLaw and science serving one master \u2026 narrative\u201d, in Scanlon, E., Hill, R. and Junker, K. (Eds), Communicating Science: Professional Contexts: Reader, Open University Press, Buckingham, p. 253."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kaplan, R.B., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kamhi\u2010Stein, L.D., Shiotani, Y. and Zimmerman, C.B. (1994), \u201cOn abstract writing\u201d, Text, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 401\u201026.","DOI":"10.1515\/text.1.1994.14.3.401"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"King, R. (1976), \u201cA comparison of the readability of abstracts with their source documents\u201d, Journal of the American Society of Information Science, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 118\u201021.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.4630270207"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b20","unstructured":"Lancaster, F.W. (2003), Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice, 3rd ed., Facet, London."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b21","unstructured":"Lemke, J.L. (1990), Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liddy, E. (1990), \u201cAnaphora in natural language processing and information retrieval\u201d, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 39\u201052.","DOI":"10.1016\/0306-4573(90)90008-P"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liddy, E. (1991), \u201cThe discourse\u2010level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study\u201d, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 55\u201081.","DOI":"10.1016\/0306-4573(91)90031-G"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b24","unstructured":"Maizell, R.E., Smith, J.F. and Singer, T.E.R. (1971), Abstracting Scientific and Technical Literature: An Introductory Guide and Text for Scientists, Abstractors and Management, Wiley\u2010Interscience, London."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b25","unstructured":"Montgomery, S. (1999), \u201cScientific discourse and its history: reflections and prospects\u201d, in Scanlon, E. and Junker, K. (Eds), Communicating Science: Professional Contexts: Reader, Open University Press, Buckingham, p. 32."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pinto, M. (1994), \u201cInterdisciplinary approaches to the concept and practice of written text documentary content analysis (WTDCA)\u201d, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 111\u201033.","DOI":"10.1108\/eb026927"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pinto, M. (1995), \u201cDocumentary abstracting: toward a methodological approach\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 225\u201034.","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(199504)46:3<225::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-N"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b28","unstructured":"Pinto, M. and Lancaster, F.W. (1999), \u201cAbstracts and abstracting in knowledge discovery\u201d, Library Trends, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 234\u201048."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pitkin, R.M., Branagan, M.A. and Burmeister, L.F. (1999), \u201cAccuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles\u201d, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 281 No. 12, pp. 1110\u20101.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.281.12.1110"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b30","unstructured":"Rashidi, L.S. (1992), \u201cToward an understanding of the notion of theme: an example from Dari\u201d, in Davies, M. and Ravelli, L. (Eds), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, Pinter, New York, NY, p. 192."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b31","unstructured":"Rowley, J.E. (1988), Abstracting and Indexing, 2nd ed., Bingley, London."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salager\u2010Meyer, F. (1990), \u201cDiscoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: a genre analysis per research\u2010 and text\u2010type\u201d, Text, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 365\u201084.","DOI":"10.1515\/text.1.1990.10.4.365"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Santos, M.B. (1996), \u201cThe textual organisation of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics\u201d, Text, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 481\u201099.","DOI":"10.1515\/text.1.1996.16.4.481"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Snizek, W.E., Oehler, K. and Mullins, N.C. (1991), \u201cTextual and non\u2010textual characteristics of scientific papers\u201d, Scientometrics, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 23\u201035.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02018141"},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b35","unstructured":"Sternberg, R.J. (2003), Cognitive Psychology, 3rd ed., Wadsworth, London."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b36","unstructured":"Swales, J.M. (1990), Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b37","unstructured":"Taylor, J. (1991), Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory, Clarendon, Oxford."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b38","unstructured":"Tibbo, H. (1993), Abstracting, Information Retrieval and The Humanities: Providing Access to Historical Literature, American Library Association, London."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b39","unstructured":"Van Dijk, T.A. (1980), Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse Interaction and Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ."},{"key":"key2022031820340942200_b40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wheatley, A. and Armstrong, C.J. (1997), \u201cMetadata, recall and abstracts\u201d, Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 49 No. 8, pp. 206\u201013.","DOI":"10.1108\/eb051467"}],"container-title":["Journal of Documentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/00220410610700953","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00220410610700953\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00220410610700953\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:37:43Z","timestamp":1753400263000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jd\/article\/62\/4\/428-446\/207588"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,7,1]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,7,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/00220410610700953"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/00220410610700953","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-0418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-0418","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,7,1]]}}}