{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:52:56Z","timestamp":1754157176592,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,17]],"date-time":"2008-10-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1224201600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,17]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The paper aims to present a part of a wider study, performed at the Department of LIS&amp;BS at the University of Ljubljana (UL). The study investigated the perceptions of user friendliness of information retrieval (IR) systems.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>An expert study and a user study were performed. The user study was based on the results of the previous expert study, which surveyed the interfaces of four e\u2010journal IR systems (Science Direct, Proquest Direct, Ebsco Host and Emerald) and has been published separately. In the user study three of these interfaces were used: Science Direct, Proquest Direct, and Ebsco Host. A pilot study with ten subjects and a main study with 61 subjects, all postgraduate students of the UL, was performed. Questionnaires and observation were used for data collection. The users' perceptions of user interfaces were investigated and compared to the findings of the expert study.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>It was found that users do not show high appreciation of auxiliary functions (such as search history, indexes, etc.) and do not use them to a great extent. They also do not prefer to have available different full\u2010text formats. Perceptions of user friendliness of elements and functions were different in each interface. For each interface it was also established that different functions and elements were influential in the overall perceptions of the interface friendliness. In comparison of the findings of the expert and user study it was found that the expert study was in some cases too detailed and investigated aspects not perceived by the users. For this reason, certain findings of both studies were not appropriate for comparison.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>The methodology of data collection was rather demanding and lengthy, and influenced the type and size of sample. Because of that it may not be possible to generalise the result to all users of e\u2010journals. Also, large quantities of data were collected which could be studied further.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>The results of the study are relevant for the design of the user interfaces of IR systems. They also have implications for other areas, e.g. user education and training.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>The study investigates the users' own perceptions of user friendliness of the e\u2010journal interfaces and also compares them to the findings of the expert study. This gives a valuable insight and provides many different viewpoints in regard to user friendliness, which in itself is a demanding concept.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/00220410810912415","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,1]],"date-time":"2008-11-01T08:07:35Z","timestamp":1225526855000},"page":"816-841","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison and evaluation of the user interfaces of e\u2010journals II: perceptions of the users"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"64","author":[{"given":"Polona","family":"Vilar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Maja","family":"\u017dumer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b1","unstructured":"Anderson, J. (1995), \u201cHave users changed their style? A survey of CD\u2010ROM vs OPAC product usage\u201d, Reference Quarterly, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 362\u20108."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b2","unstructured":"Backlund, J. (2001), Web Interfaces and Usability: [Masters Project], Centre for User Oriented IT Design, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borgman, C.L. (1986), \u201cWhy are online catalogues hard to use? Lessons learned from information retrieval studies\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 387\u2010400.","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(198611)37:6<387::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-8"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b4","unstructured":"Borgman, C.L. (1987), \u201cToward a definition of user friendly: a psychological perspective\u201d, What is User Friendly?, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois, Urbana\u2010Champaign, IL, pp. 29\u201044."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borgman, C.L. (1996), \u201cWhy are online catalogues still hard to use?\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 47 No. 7, pp. 493\u2010503.","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(199607)47:7<493::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-P"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borgman, C.L. (2000), From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World, MIT, Cambridge, MA.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/3131.001.0001"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b7","unstructured":"Borgman, C.L. (2003), \u201cDesigning digital libraries for usability\u201d, in Peterson Bishop, A., Van House, N. and Buttenfield, B. (Eds), Digital Library Use: Social Practice and Evaluation, MIT, Cambridge, MA and London, pp. 85\u2010118."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b8","unstructured":"Dumas, J. (1998), Designing User Interfaces for Software, Prentice\u2010Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, NJ."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fast, K.V. and Campbell, D.G. (2004), \u201c\u201cI still like Google\u201d: university student perceptions of searching OPACs and the Web\u201d, Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, Vol. 41, pp. 138\u201046.","DOI":"10.1002\/meet.1450410116"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b11","unstructured":"Gorman, G.E. and Clayton, P. (Eds). (1998), Qualitative Research for the Information Professional: A Practical Handbook, Library Association, London."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b12","unstructured":"Hansen, P. (1999), \u201cUser interface design for IR interaction: a task oriented approach\u201d, in Aparac, T., Saracevic, T., Ingwersen, P. and Vakkari, P. (Eds), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS 3): Digital Libraries: Interdisciplinary Concepts, Challenges and Opportunity, Vol. 3, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, pp. 191\u2010205."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b13","unstructured":"ISO\/IEC 9126 (2001), Software Engineering \u2013 Product Quality, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jen\u2010Hwa Hu, P., Pai\u2010Chun, M. and Chau, P.Y.K. (1999), \u201cEvaluation of user interface designs for information retrieval systems: a computer based experiment\u201d, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 27, pp. 125\u201043.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-9236(99)00040-8"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leventhal, L., Teasley, B., Blumenthal, B., Instone, K., Stone, D. and Donskoy, M.V. (1996), \u201cAssessing user interfaces for diverse user groups: evaluation strategies and defining characteristics\u201d, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 127\u201038.","DOI":"10.1080\/014492996120210"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b16","unstructured":"Mann, T. (1987), A Guide to Library Research Methods, Oxford University Press, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marchionini, G. (1995), Information Seeking in an Electronic Environment, University Press, Cambridge.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511626388"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nickerson, R.S. (1999), \u201cWhy interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them\u201d, International Journal of Human\u2010Computer Studies, Vol. 51, pp. 307\u201021.","DOI":"10.1006\/ijhc.1981.0311"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b19","unstructured":"Nielsen, J. (1994), \u201cHeuristic evaluation\u201d, in Nielsen, J. and Mack, R.L. (Eds), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b20","unstructured":"Nielsen, J. (1999), Designing the Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity, New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Petrelli, D., Beaulieu, M., Sanderson, M., Demetriou, G., Herring, P. and Hansen, P. (2003), \u201cObserviong users, designing clarity: a case study on the user\u2010centred design of a cross\u2010language information retrieval system\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 55 No. 10, pp. 923\u201034.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.20036"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b22","unstructured":"Rowley, J. and Slack, F. (1998), Designing Public Access Systems, Gower, Aldershot."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b23","unstructured":"Shneiderman, B. (1998), Designing the User Interface. Strategies for Effective Human\u2010Computer Interaction, 3rd ed., Addison Wesley, Reading, MA."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tenopir, C. (2003), \u201cInformation metrics and user studies\u201d, Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 55 Nos 1\/2, pp. 13\u201017.","DOI":"10.1108\/00012530310462661"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vilar, P. and \u017dumer, M. (2005), \u201cComparison and evaluation of the user interfaces of e\u2010journals\u201d, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 203\u201027.","DOI":"10.1108\/00220410510585197"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b26","unstructured":"Wang, P. (2003), \u201cFrom OPACs to portals: perspectives on usability and user\u2010centred design\u201d, Proceedings of CAS Symposium on Sustainable Development and Innovation Libraries, Beijing, China, December 20\u201023, pp. 256\u201067."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b27","unstructured":"Weinschenk, S., Jamar, P. and Jeo, S.C. (1997), GUI Design Essentials, Wiley Computer Publishing, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xie, H.I. (2003), \u201cSupporting ease of use and user control: desired features and structure of web\u2010based online IR systems\u201d, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 39, pp. 899\u2010922.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-4573(02)00042-0"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xie, H.I. (2004), \u201cOnline IR system evaluation: online databases versus web search engines\u201d, Online Information Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 211\u20109.","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520410543652"},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_b30","unstructured":"\u017dumer, M. (2000), \u201cUser interfaces of national bibliographies on CD\u2010ROM: results of a survey\u201d, Program, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 281\u201090."},{"key":"key2022012220185974900_frd1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ford, N., Wilson, T.D., Foster, A., Ellis, D. and Spink, A. (2002), \u201cInformation seeking and mediated searching. Part 4. Cognitive styles in information seeking\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53 No. 9, pp. 728\u201035.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.10084"}],"container-title":["Journal of Documentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/00220410810912415","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00220410810912415\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00220410810912415\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:38:00Z","timestamp":1753400280000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jd\/article\/64\/6\/816-841\/204388"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,17]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,17]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/00220410810912415"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/00220410810912415","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-0418"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0022-0418"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,17]]}}}