{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]],"date-time":"2025-10-20T18:10:00Z","timestamp":1760983800416,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,7]],"date-time":"2010-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1283817600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The paper aims to provide some insight into mental models of the bibliographic universe and how they compare with functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) as a conceptual model of the bibliographic universe.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>To get a more complete picture of the mental models, different elicitation techniques were used. The three tasks of the paper were: card\u2010sorting, concept mapping and comparison task. The paper deals with comparison task, which consisted of interviews and rankings, and provides a discussion of the results of the paper as a whole.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>Results of the ranking part of the comparison task confirm the findings of concept mapping task. In both cases, while there are individual differences between mental models, on average they gravitate towards FRBR.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>This is a small study and it provides only a glimpse of the implications of using FRBR as a conceptual basis for cataloguing. More FRBR\u2010related user studies are needed, including similar studies on different groups of individuals and different types of materials, as well as practical studies of user needs and user interfaces.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>The results of this study are the first user\u2010tested indication of the validity of FRBR as a conceptual basis for the future of cataloguing.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>This is the first published paper of mental models of the bibliographic universe and uses a unique combination of mental model elicitation techniques.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/00220411011066781","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,11]],"date-time":"2010-09-11T07:01:24Z","timestamp":1284188484000},"page":"668-680","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Mental models of the bibliographic universe. Part 2: comparison task and conclusions"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"66","author":[{"given":"Jan","family":"Pisanski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Maja","family":"\u017dumer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022021220474280200_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borgman, C. (1985), \u201cThe user's mental model of an information retrieval system\u201d, Proceedings of the 8th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Montreal, pp. 268\u201073.","DOI":"10.1145\/253495.253533"},{"key":"key2022021220474280200_b2","unstructured":"Carlyle, A. (2003), \u201cUser perspectives of works\u201d, paper presented at Humanizing Information Technology, ASIST Annual Conference, October 22, Long Beach, available at: http:\/\/dlist.sir.arizona.edu\/archive\/00000272\/01\/CarlyleWorksandUsers.pdf (accessed 6 June 2009)."},{"key":"key2022021220474280200_b3","unstructured":"FRBR (1998), Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report, KG Saur, M\u00fcnchen."},{"key":"key2022021220474280200_b4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"George, C. (2008), User\u2010Centred Library Websites, Chandos, Oxford.","DOI":"10.1533\/9781780631905"},{"key":"key2022021220474280200_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lanzing, J. (1997), \u201cThe concept mapping homepage\u201d, available at: http:\/\/users.edte.utwente.nl\/lanzing\/cm_home.htm (accessed 18 March 2009).","DOI":"10.1080\/23796529.1998.11674524"},{"key":"key2022021220474280200_b6","unstructured":"Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control (2008), On the Record, available at: www.loc.gov\/bibliographic\u2010future\/news\/lcwg\u2010ontherecord\u2010jan08\u2010final.pdf (accessed 19 January 2009)."},{"key":"key2022021220474280200_b7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Madison, O. (2005), \u201cThe origins of the IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records\u201d, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Vol. 39 Nos 3\/4, pp. 15\u201037.","DOI":"10.1300\/J104v39n03_02"},{"key":"key2022021220474280200_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pisanski, J. and \u017dumer, M. (2007), \u201cFunctional requirements for bibliographic records: an investigation of two prototypes\u201d, Program, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 400\u201017.","DOI":"10.1108\/00330330710831602"},{"key":"key2022021220474280200_b9","unstructured":"Yee, M. (2007), \u201cWill the response of the library profession to the internet BE self\u2010immolation?\u201d, available at: www.slc.bc.ca\/response.htm (accessed 20 February 2009)."}],"container-title":["Journal of Documentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/00220411011066781","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00220411011066781\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00220411011066781\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:38:15Z","timestamp":1753400295000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jd\/article\/66\/5\/668-680\/204331"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,7]]},"references-count":9,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/00220411011066781"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/00220411011066781","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-0418"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0022-0418"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,7]]}}}