{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:57:37Z","timestamp":1754157457800,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]],"date-time":"2007-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1177977600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]]},"abstract":"Purpose<\/jats:title>The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the experiences of setting up an institutional repository at Loughborough University, focusing on some of the key issues that it was necessary to consider, the choices made and the challenges overcome.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>The paper outlines the various decision processes involved during the 12\u2010month pilot phase. These include: choosing appropriate software; customising DSpace; implementing licences; and gathering content for the repository.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Findings<\/jats:title>The experiences highlight some of the challenges involved in setting up an institutional repository.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Originality\/value<\/jats:title>This paper gives a direct insight into the different types of work involved in the setting up of an institutional repository and is an example of a system set up outside the boundaries of project funding.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/00330330710742890","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,19]],"date-time":"2007-06-19T11:03:31Z","timestamp":1182251011000},"page":"113-123","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Building an institutional repository at Loughborough University: some experiences"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Joanna","family":"Barwick","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022020520365100800_b1","unstructured":"Barwick, J. and Pickton, M. (2006), \u201cA librarian's guide to institutional repositories\u201d, eLucidate, Vol. 3 No. 2, available at: http:\/\/magpie.lboro.ac.uk\/dspace\/handle\/2134\/1122."},{"key":"key2022020520365100800_b2","unstructured":"Bates, M., Gadd, E., Loddington, S., Manuel, S. and Oppenheim, C. (2006), \u201cRights and rewards in Blended Institutional Repositories project\u201d, ALISS (Association of Librarians and Information Professionals in the Social Sciences) Quarterly, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 47\u201051."},{"key":"key2022020520365100800_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bevan, S. (2005), \u201cElectronic theses development at Cranfield University\u201d, Program: electronic library and information systems, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 100\u201011.","DOI":"10.1108\/00330330510595689"},{"key":"key2022020520365100800_b4","unstructured":"Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C. and Probets, S. (2003), \u201cThe intellectual property rights issues facing self\u2010archiving: key findings of the RoMEO project\u201d, D\u2010Lib Magazine, Vol. 9 No. 9, available at: www.dlib.org\/dlib\/september03\/gadd\/09gadd.html."},{"key":"key2022020520365100800_b5","unstructured":"Grieg, M. (2005), Institutional Advocacy Campaign: Guidelines and Practical Advice, DAEDALUS project: Workpackage 3 \u2013 Advocacy, available at: https:\/\/dspace.gla.ac.uk\/handle\/1905\/377."},{"key":"key2022020520365100800_b6","unstructured":"Grieg, M. and Nixon, W. (2005), \u201cDAEDALUS: Delivering the Glasgow ePrints service\u201d, Ariadne, No. 45, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk\/issue45\/greig\u2010nixon\/."},{"key":"key2022020520365100800_b7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jones, R. and Andrew, T. (2005), \u201cOpen access, open source and e\u2010theses: the development of the Edinburgh Research Archive\u201d, Program: electronic library and information systems, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 198\u2010212.","DOI":"10.1108\/00330330510610555"},{"key":"key2022020520365100800_b8","unstructured":"Lynch, C. (2003), \u201cInstitutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age\u201d, ARL Bimonthly Report, No. 226, pp. 1\u20107, available at: www.arl.org\/newsltr\/226\/ir.html."},{"key":"key2022020520365100800_b9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simpson, P. and Hey, J. (2006), \u201cRepositories for research: Southampton's evolving role in the knowledge cycle\u201d, Program: electronic library and information systems, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 224\u201032.","DOI":"10.1108\/00330330610681303"}],"container-title":["Program"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/00330330710742890","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00330330710742890\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/00330330710742890\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:55:23Z","timestamp":1753401323000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/dta\/article\/41\/2\/113-123\/328332"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]]},"references-count":9,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/00330330710742890"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/00330330710742890","relation":{},"ISSN":["0033-0337"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0033-0337"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]]}}}