{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T07:32:46Z","timestamp":1770967966537,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":5,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,23]],"date-time":"2010-11-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1290470400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,23]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study is to address problems associated with the accessibility of academic library databases.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study evaluates 32 databases and measures their accessibility to users of adaptive technology.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>Based on the results of this study, 72 percent of the evaluated databases were rated as marginally accessible or inaccessible, reflecting a low level of compliance to federal web accessibility legislation and international web accessibility standards. To measure database accessibility to adaptive technology users, this study operationalized accessibility into ten component parts as the Tatomir Accessibility Checklist (TAC) and tested each database on each component.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>Findings of this study can be used both by those who purchase and manage databases in libraries to identify the most accessible databases and by designers of the databases to improve specific features.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/07378831011096240","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,27]],"date-time":"2010-11-27T07:01:54Z","timestamp":1290841314000},"page":"577-594","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Overcoming the information gap"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Tatomir","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Joan C.","family":"Durrance","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022021920122479800_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Byerley, S.L., Chambers, M.B. and Thohira, M. (2007), \u201cAccessibility of web\u2010based library databases: the vendors' perspectives in 2007\u201d, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 509\u201027.","DOI":"10.1108\/07378830710840473"},{"key":"key2022021920122479800_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Comeaux, D. and Schmetzke, A. (2007), \u201cWeb accessibility trends in university libraries and library schools\u201d, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 457\u201077.","DOI":"10.1108\/07378830710840437"},{"key":"key2022021920122479800_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee, Y.S. (2005), \u201cThe impact of ICT on library services for the visually impaired\u201d, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3815, pp. 44\u201051.","DOI":"10.1007\/11599517_6"},{"key":"key2022021920122479800_b4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Providenti, M. and Zai, R. (2007), \u201cWeb accessibility at academic libraries: standards, legislation, and enforcement\u201d, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 494\u2010508.","DOI":"10.1108\/07378830710840455"},{"key":"key2022021920122479800_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shirley, E. and Douglas, G. (2008), \u201cE\u2010learning and blindness: a comparative study of the quality of an e\u2010learning experience\u201d, Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, Vol. 102, pp. 77\u201088.","DOI":"10.1177\/0145482X0810200203"}],"container-title":["Library Hi Tech"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/07378831011096240","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/07378831011096240\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/07378831011096240\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:33:46Z","timestamp":1753400026000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/lht\/article\/28\/4\/577-594\/261781"}},"subtitle":["Measuring the accessibility of library databases to adaptive technology users"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,23]]},"references-count":5,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,23]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/07378831011096240"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/07378831011096240","relation":{},"ISSN":["0737-8831"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0737-8831","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,23]]}}}